Peace and safety – or destruction?

dakowski.pl 1 week ago

Peace and safety – or destruction?

Stanislaw Michalkiewicz “The Most advanced Time!” 2 June 2026 Michalkiewicz

Mr Jacek “He appointed a tiny one-year salary, more than a promise.” — so Telimena in “Mr Tadeusz“ he explains to justice Soplica the material situation of Zosia, which, by the will of the same Mr Jack, or Jack Soplica, takes care of. But we will not be dealing with property matters in Lithuania, which, by the way, are highly tasty, as can be seen in my book “Anschluss. Targowice takes place on Napoleon“ – only the situation of our unhappy country.

It is akin to that described in St Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians: “For erstwhile they say "peace and security," there will come to them an unexpected destruction.It’s okay. ” Isn't that what happened erstwhile our beloved leaders, dedicating themselves behind the surviving shield of the American troops, began to play, not even in power with Mrs. Svetlana Cichuruska, but in jerking a Russian tiger by the tail? due to the fact that we request to know that the rotating American military contingent in Poland plays a function “live shieldIt’s okay. ”

The combination is this: if Putin had shot even 1 American, it would have been a casus belli, after which America would have applied Article 5 of the Washington Treaty and the final triumph would have been at hand. It is so worth recalling the wording of Article 5 of that Treaty:

The Parties agree that an armed assault on 1 or more of them in Europe or North America will be deemed to constitute an assault against all of them and so agree that if specified assault occurs, each of them, in the exercise of the right to individual or collective self-defense recognised under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the organization or Parties assaulted by acting without delay, or in agreement with another Parties, the action it considers necessary, including the usage of armed forces in order to keep or reconstruct the safety of the North Atlantic area.

As we can see, Article 5 contains 1 essential condition for launching the alliance procedures in it. She is. armed assaultat least 1 ally. If, on the another hand, an ally attacks individual himself – as was the case with the Israeli-American attack on evil Iran – there is no treaty reason to launch these allied procedures.

A akin situation can be met and our unfortunate country, if he would like to make amends to the Ukrainian president Zelenski, who has been trying to bring the countries of Central Europe into it from the very beginning of the war, especially the Baltic powers. This would be a very dangerous situation for Poland, due to the fact that due to the wording of Article 5, Poland would not be the victim of any "armed assaultShe only joined a war that is already in progress. ” In this situation, it is very possible that the American military would not even decision out of the barracks, due to the fact that although it is located in the territory of our bantan, it is not subject to the indigenous government, but to its own government, and this 1 could command glorious restraint.

In general, the question of whether the Polish government could order our invincible army to launch various weapons would besides require clarification – due to the fact that at least I do not know how many of them Americans could exclude, making them useless on the battlefield – if for political reasons the American government considered it beneficial. The second conclusion to be drawn from Article 5 of the Washington Treaty is that It does not contain any automatic reaction. Any ally can give “suffocated“ specified assistance as it deems appropriate in the situation in question,including the usage of armed forcesIt’s okay. ” usage ‘armed forces” is so only 1 possible reaction, the same as the 1 for the attacker called “an acute protestIt’s okay. ”

Of course, erstwhile Poland joined NATO in December 1999, it did not have the least influence on the content of the Washington Treaty, which was for us a kind of “agreements by accession“ – without the anticipation of shaping its conditions. But you like what you've got, so there's nothing to spin about it, especially since the US and Russia, in 1997, 2 years before the NATO expansion to the east, concluded alleged "Paris Agreements", containing "Trust building measuresIt’s okay. ” The Americans there promised that Western atomic weapons would not be moved east of the erstwhile German-German border, i.e., between the West Germany and the GDR, and that a state recently admitted to NATO would not be assumed to be "fixed bases“ The Alliance – for Moscow did not quench opposition to joining NATO.

Apparently, these findings are inactive regarded as valid, which we can conclude on the basis that the presence of US troops in Poland is "RotaryIt’s okay. ” And on this background a storm broke out in a glass of water, erstwhile it turned out that the USA “delayed rotation“ 4,000 soldiers, in addition to the situation erstwhile president Donald Trump began to endanger to punish Germany, will reduce the number of Americans stationed there. Although the Germans do not confide in me, it seems to me that – although officially spinning their noses on this punishment – in a situation where no 1 sees them, they wipe their hands from the joy that here is simply a chance to repeal the last consequence of the war lost by Adolf Hitler. erstwhile Stalin faced force on Western Europe in 1949, the Americans decided to rebuild the German state from 3 Western business zones, the alleged "trisonii‘ Germany continued to stay occupied until 12 September 1990, erstwhile the Treaty on the Final Regulation for Germany was signed in Moscow, commonly called "Treaty 2 plus 4It’s okay. ”

The treaty abolished the business of Germany, and although the American troops inactive remained in their erstwhile places, it was no longer as occupying troops, but stationed on the basis of agreements. Anyway – but stationed, so if – let’s even “for punishment“The United States would evacuate them from there, that would mean that this last consequence of Adolf Hitler’s losing war is besides removed, so that Germany would not gotta keep far-reaching caution in global politics, especially after 2039, erstwhile the Bundeswehr is to become the strongest army in Europe.

The hold in rotation – as the United States has called it – caused any kind of panic among our beloved leaders, who realized that it was not safe at all. Thus, the Warsaw pilgrimage to Washington went to the Deputy Minister of National Defense, who tried, if they did not persuade American tough guys not to hold the rotation, at least to learn something circumstantial about it – but beyond the statements of Vice president Vance that America “we”Love” and that Poland will defend itself, of course, with effective American aid, they did not get either. Of course, it deepened the feeling of swallow anxiety among our beloved leaders. It was only erstwhile president Donald Trump – supposedly citing relationship with president Karol Nawrocki – tweeted that he would direct not 4,000 soldiers to our unhappy country, but 5,000 soldiers. In words, ‘more promise said“ Of course, what joy do we rejoice about, how do we not rejoice?

And while we're at president Donald Trump, he seems to have already realized that the Prime Minister of Israel's priceless national unity government, what is this “is bound” with the thought “Great Israel“ From the Nile to the Euphrates, he let him and all America into a canal, ordering him to attack sinister Iran immediately. However, it turned out that the sinister Iran is simply a harder nut to crack than president Trump seemed, so the American-Iranian relations had a stalemate.

On top of that, not only the Americans, but besides the remainder of the planet saw that president Trump listens to Israel, even at the expense of bringing America into the motivated judaic fantasymagories of the scandal. In this situation, it was hard to believe president Trump's bubbling statements that he would make America large again in a situation where the Jews led him by the nose and the tail rammed the dog. In this situation, he made a desperate effort to free America from the judaic occupation, mentioned long ago by Patrick Buchanan, calling Washington – an American capital whose citizen Żurek Waldemar most likely does not separate from the state of Washington – “The territory occupied by IsraelIt’s okay. ”

Will this national-liberating operation win with president Trump – this is not a certainty – due to the fact that it is much harder than the operation to capture Nicholas Maduro in Venezuela, harder than to knock Cuba on the knee, harder than to take over Greenland, or even – than to overcome a pat in relations with a sinister Iran, the more so that the old judaic financial grantor Jerzy Soros reportedly is mobilizing millions or even billions of dollars again to run against Donald Trump, in which all American and planet Jews, who know that without the United States power of fantasy about “Great Israel“ We’ll gotta postpone ad calendas Graecas.

Stanisław Michalkiewicz

Read Entire Article