When this Substack had only just begun a fewer years ago, an article appeared about Saul Alinksy, who was a kind of informing against what was going on and what was to come.
Before we decision on to our article of the day, let's first look at this revelation of Alinks on Substack of the 1920s, erstwhile the PSYOP-19 scandal continued:
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama They are students of Saul Alinky's "student". The first 1 she wrote Diplomatic work au Wellesley College about his work and constant Be his mailing friend. The second was a candidate's work. CIA to Manchuria, whose task was to stay (dis)a community organizer in Chicago, a straight reporting national terrorist and CIA associate Bill Ayers, as well as allegedly conducting classes at Harvard about this Luciferan communist.
If the reader had any doubts about the author's vile ideology, everything will dispel erstwhile the "archive" opens; namely:
Alisnky learned all of his methods and utilized his skills, gaining unprecedented access to a criminal underworld, and was besides considered a "mask" of the Chicago student mob. Most of his tactics (de)organizing the community came straight from mafia methods, which he greatly admired.
"I've learned a lot about the usage and abuse of power from the mob, lessons that later came in very useful erstwhile I was organizing," he told the magazine.
Playboy asked if Alinsky had "any scruples towards contacts with — if not actually helping — murderers?"
"Nothing," Alinsky said, "because I couldn't do anything to halt them from killing."
Alinsky described his ties to Capone as "heaven" and called the public chief "a benefactor".
"Gang Capone was in fact a public enterprise; she provided what people wanted and demanded," said Alinsky. "The man on the street wanted girls: Capone gave him girls. He wanted alcohol during Prohibition: Capone gave him alcohol."
Aaron Petback's essay, surviving in Brooklyn, which defines itself, explains the importance of Alinky's relation with organized work.
"Alinsky's experience with CIO profoundly shaped him. Communist and socialist influences grew in the labour movement" explains Petcoff in the May issue of the Jacobin quarterly issue of 2017.
The technocratic dystopian mess in which we are presently in – extremist left and various intellectual operations and false flags – has mostly become possible thanks to Alinsky's influence on Deep State apparatusists, specified as the Clinton and Biden crime families, corrupt DC politicians and the unconstitutional mafia culture of government agencies, with Obama being virtually a CIA product.
Alinsky rightly understood from the beginning that to effectively dismantle America, it would should be ultralocal. To save America, a akin ultra-local organization is needed, but for the common good, not for any crazy sociopathic plan to take over power, whose eventual goal was hyper-central control.
Alinksy claimed that the provocations, lies and manipulations of the mark demographic group, which the community (not)organizer is simply a social engineering, were the main means to accomplish the desired neo-Marxist results, targeting their goals at "getto" and minorities, convincing these demographic groups that they are "supported", while in fact they are grossly utilized for political purposes, at any cost.
In the late 1960s and early 1970s. Alinsky was in excellent company erstwhile American radicalism merged with national terrorist organizations specified as Weather Underground (See: Bill Ayers), a mad socialist from the Columbia University chest bone tower, like Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, who developed a strategy Cloward-Piven – destruct Americans from within, and others.
All these forces, although not completely dormant in these decades, slow gained momentum and mass acceptance, are now being reinforced and accelerated by the colour revolution, accelerating the demolition of what is left of this Constitutional Republic.
Alinky had a deep knowing of the reversal of reality, as did all his disciples.
Here is simply a brief summary of his approach to overthrowing the US:
Wouldn't be a surprise if The Secretary-General He slept with a copy. Principles for Radicals under the pillow next to the copies Mein Kampf and The Communist ManifestoLet's not forget Lenin's bust in his office:
If Alinky were alive today, he'd be most arrogant of his vile work.
A small extra colour on Lenin, Marx, Alinks, Obama and identity polytrix...
Social collectiveism is simply a major origin in full control over people
To better realize the nature of dividing social collectivism, it is worth reading Antonio GramsciSome political discipline experts rightly consider the top political stratega in history.
... Which brings us to today's outstanding article:
author: AndreaWex
If you've always looked into modern politics and wondered why everything seemed manipulative, sharing and imaginary, then you're not crazy.
The rot didn't come overnight. It was taught. It was investigated. It was introduced on purpose. 1 of the most crucial creators of specified reasoning was Saul Alinsky.
This is not a conspiracy theory. That's history.
Who truly was Saul Alinsky
Alinsky was a social organizer from Chicago who believed that power never gives up voluntarily and must be conquered under pressure, disruption and intellectual warfare. He was not curious in unity. He was curious in the results. His worldview treated society as a battlefield between those who have, and those who do not have, where ethics were flexible, and the optional fact if it stood in the way of victory.
His 1971 book "Rules for Radicals" was written as a tactical manual for activists. It wasn't about building a republic. It was about dismantling existing systems so that something else could replace them.
That discrimination matters.
Why Principles for Radicals inactive Matter
Alinsky's rules are simple, brutal and effective. They are designed to destabilize, polarize and exhaust their opponents until opposition breaks.
A fewer examples that you will immediately admit in modern politics:
Laughing is the most powerful weapon.
Make the enemy follow his own rules.
Pick a target, frost it, personalize and polarize it.
Keep pressure. Never let go.
Sound familiar?
These tactics explain why the debate has been replaced by ridicule, why institutions are attacked alternatively of arguments, and opponents are dehumanized alternatively than engaged. It's not a coincidence. It's Alinsky's real-time textbook.
Alinsky's rules for radicals:
Here's a textbook, without academic nonsense and translated into actual terms. erstwhile you read it, you'll never halt seeing it.
Adversary. Meaning is more crucial than reality. If you can convince people that you are strong, many or morally just, you gain an advantage even if it is exaggerated.
. Keep your activists where they feel confident. Comfort builds courage. Uncertainty gives emergence to hesitation.
. Force him to enter unknown areas. The confusion leads to mistakes. Mistakes can be utilized as weapons.
Use their declared values against them. Require perfection without fulfilling it. Hypocrisy charges are devastating erstwhile utilized selectively.
Mockery works due to the fact that it demoralizes, delegitates and closes the debate. It's not easy to keep from laughing.
. If activists like it, they'll show up. Emotional satisfaction is more crucial than logic.
, Rotate – outrage. Keep the conflict fresh. Tiredness kills moves.
Never let yourself breathe. all pause is an chance to regenerate or reflect.
: Fear works better than execution. Predictably destabilizes your opponents before anything happens.
On many fronts. quite a few crises. No solution. Overwhelm until the opposition breaks down.
Accuuse. Eventually, the prosecution becomes the fact in public consciousness, regardless of the evidence.
. Even if it is unclear or impossible, you must pretend to build something better to justify destruction.
. Send complex systems to the villain role. Make it all about this individual or group. Dehumanize them to make the opposition seem fair.
It's not activism.
It's a intellectual war utilized in politics.
Once you realize these rules, you'll see them everywhere. Media cycles. Protest movement. Cancel the campaign. organization overthrows. Even the language people usage now.
Alinsky didn't just compose a book.
He gave the future radicals a map.
And much of modern America follows this step by step.
Alinsky and Hitler: The same Dark Handbook
Alinsky openly studied Hitler's tactics and recognized its effectiveness.
It matters.
Alinsky's frame is about power, not morality.
In the introduction to Principles for Radicals Alinsky refers to Lucifer as the first extremist and clearly indicates that his work concerns how power is taken over, maintained and used, not whether the case itself is right. He was brutally honest about it.
Hitler was 1 of the most effective mass manipulators in history. Not due to the fact that his ideas were good, but due to the fact that his methods worked.
Alinsky understood.
Tactical overlapping
This is where Hitler and Alinsky intersect.
Both were based on:
• Polarisation of society
• Dehumanisation of opponents
• Laughing and mocking to weaken resistance
• Control narration by repeating
• Turning institutions against themselves •
Presenting opposition as immoral or dangerous
• Mobilising Regrets and Resumptions
• Making people choose sides
Hitler utilized this script before it was named
Hitler's tallness followed a pattern that should seem painfully familiar:
He identified his enemies.
He was blaming the person.
Freezing targets for symbols.
He ridiculed, embarrassed and isolated his opponents.
He applied constant force and chaos.
He presented himself as the only moral solution.
It's not a coincidence.
These steps are straight consistent with Alinsky's principles, especially:
• regulation 4: Make the enemy follow his own rules
• regulation 5: A mockery is the most powerful weapon of man
• regulation 8: Keep the Pressure
• regulation 13: choice the target, frost it, personalize it, polarize it
Alinsky didn't invent evil. He codified it.
The Difference That Counts
Hitler applied these tactics to genocide and totalitarian control.
Alinsky argued that they could be utilized by powerless to fight established systems.
But tactics have no morals.
The heart of the individual who uses it does so.
When you justify lying, manipulating, humiliating and dehumanizing for "greater good", you stand on the same stand where all totalitarian government stood before falling into mass cruelty.
When you see:
• protest movements based on ridicule and pressure
• Political opponents treated as subhuman
• Speech presented as Violence
• Selective Law
• Institutions used
as a weapon • fact treated as flexible
• The end always justifies the means
You don't watch democracy.
You observe the early mechanisms of authoritarianism, whether wrapped in nationalism or socialism.
Hitler has shown us where this road ends.
Alinsky showed future activists how to decision faster.
Political lineage that no 1 wants to talk about
Hillary Clinton openly wrote her dissertation on Alinsky and praised his methods. Barack Obama worked as a community organizer in Chicago in organizations inspired by the Industrial Areas Foundation Alinsky and taught organizational tactics based on the same philosophy. These are documented facts, not speculation.
You don't gotta believe that all politician who studied Alinsky is bad to understand. Just admit that ideas form behavior, and Alinsky's ideas were never consistent with a constitutional republic based on limited government and individual freedom.
Its framework sees people as tools, not citizens.
Who studied, praised or applied Alinsky's textbook:
This is where everything ceases to be theoretical and becomes uncomfortable.
Saul Alinsky did not compose the Rules for Radicals in vacuum. His ideas were taught, studied, praised and implemented. any openly embrace it. Others absorb his tactics through institutions and movements shaped by his framework.
Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton wrote her dissertation at Wellesley College in 1969 on Saul Alinsky entitled "There's Only a Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model." She interviewed Alinsky, corresponded with him, and praised his organizational methods. Alinsky even offered her a occupation she refused. Although Clinton later rhetorically distanced herself, her early admiration and survey of his work rise no uncertainty and are well documented.
Barack Obama
Prior to Obama's politics, he worked as a community organizer in Chicago in the 1980s, working with groups modeled on Alinsky's approach with the Industrial Areas Foundation. He led workshops and training with Alinsky kind organizing rules. Obama admitted to this background, presenting it as a pragmatic social commitment. Critics claim that his campaigns and kind of governance reflected Alinsky's tactics of pressure, polarization, and communicative control.
Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta
Leaders United Farm WorkersChavez and Huerta worked straight with Alinsky and applied his organizational methods. This is undeniable and frequently cited even by progressive historians. Their union movement has become 1 of Alinsky's most effective real-world applications.
Organisational and protest strategies Jesse Jackson
Jackson's civilian rights era was inspired by Alinsky's model, which established a force and confrontation policy based on a coalition.
Consumer campaigns Ralph Nader
Nadera reflected Alinsky-style tactics, especially attacking corporations, personalizing guilt and exerting sustained social pressure.
Foundation
Industrial areas established by Alinsky in 1940, the IAF trained generations of organizers. Many modern activist organizations derive their roots straight or indirectly from this model.
Networks
progressive activistic Moves like Occupy Wall Street, climate activist groups and modern protest organizations frequently reflect Alinsky's principles, knowingly or not. Laughing, polarization, constant force and personalized goals are key features.
Modern Democratic Game
Field Although not all politician is simply a supporter of Alinsky, grassroots mobilization strategies applied in fresh decades are strictly consistent with his principles. This includes narration frameworks, social force campaigns and organization distortions.
Tim Walz
Some critics claim that Walz's rhetoric and policies reflect Alinsky kind tactics, but there is no documented individual investigation or support.
Checking the past before the vice president's debate today: Tim Walz and the Communist organization of China
America is at the end of the long-term extremist takeover of power by Marxists, which is why the Democratic Party's candidate for vice president was elected a long-term loser of the Communist organization of China, specified as Tim Walz.
Active language Ilhan Omar
and confrontation-based policies are frequently compared by critics to Alinsky's framework.
Broader Party
Democratic David Alinsky, boy of Saul Alinsky, publically stated that Obama's campaigns reflected his father's methods. This claim is the subject of discussion, but it strengthens the thesis that tactics last man and become part of political culture.
Not everyone on the left has sat down and read the extremist Rules.
Ideological infiltration doesn't work that way.
Ideas spread through institutions, training programmes, activistic culture, media support and political incentives. You don't gotta worship Alinski to follow his tactics. You just gotta believe that the end justifies the means.
And that's the danger.
Because erstwhile politics becomes a substance of power at all costs, fact becomes optional, morality is easy to negotiate, and republic becomes expendable.
From Alinski to Davos
Let us decision to present and look at the crowd of the planet economical Forum in Davos. Same contempt for average people. Same control obsession. The same belief that elites should decide how others live.
During the flight, private jets teach about sustainable development. They shame you for the carbon footprint, while behind closed doors they plunge into moral decline. They talk about equality while treating working people as disposable resources.
This is Alinsky's worldview, improved and scaled around the world.
Power justifies itself. The end justifies the means. People are managed, not respected.
Epstein was no exception
This approach besides explains why there are scandals like Epstein. erstwhile elites cease to see people as human beings and begin to see them as goods, exploitation becomes inevitable. Epstein didn't work in vacuum. He acted in a culture where powerful people believed that the rules did not apply to them, and work belongs to others.
And announcement what never happens.
No real justice.
No real responsibility.
Just endless delays, closed files, and organization silence.
It's not a failure. This is simply a project.
Why it always ends the same way
Every socialist or communist movement starts the same way. divided the population. Conquer trust. Attack the institutions. Artificial tradition. Rewrite your tongue. Then centralized power in the name of justice.
History is brutally consistent at this point.
And erstwhile justice is gone, there is anxiety. People sense this imbalance, even if they can't express it. That's why the streets are burning and the criminals are walking free. Therefore, the defendants of January 6 rot in prison while the powerful perpetrators flee. That's why ICE agents are attacked erstwhile NGOs pay bail for rioters.
A society without justice can't survive.
The Needed Line in Sand
This is simply a fragment that Tom Renz He always emphasizes very clearly erstwhile he talks about Saul Alinsky, and that matters.
We don't become them.
We're not lying.
We're not cheating.
We don't steal.
We're not abandoning the fact to win the dispute.
We don't fight evil by participating.
But here is the hard fact that besides many good people avoid saying out loud.
You can't defeat an enemy you don't want to understand.
Alinsky's rules are not a proposition about our behavior. They're a diagnostic tool. A way to see the battlefield clearly. A way to know erstwhile you're manipulated, ridiculed, cornered and mentally disarmed.
The extremist left now does not play checkers. They don't even play chess. They conduct coordinated intellectual operations utilizing media, culture, law, ridicule and imaginary outrage.
And besides many on our side are inactive pretending it's a polite debate.
You don't bring a knife to a shooting.
No courtesy is brought into the propaganda war.
And you don't beat a scam-based movement, refusing to call it.
Fighting doesn't mean becoming immoral. That means waking up.
That means knowing the tactics utilized against you to halt you falling for them. That means refusing to be embarrassed and silent. It means revealing manipulation alternatively of absorbing it. It means to stand firm in the fact while refusing intellectual persecution.
Jesus did not ignore evil. He confronted it directly.
If you do not realize how your enemy thinks, you will always react, not drive. And the reaction is precisely where Alinsky wants you to be.
So the question is not whether you should take these tactics.
The question is this:
Now that you see what you're doing, what are you gonna defend yourself with?
The only way out
It doesn't end with a better transmission or a nicer rhetoric. It ends with citizens recognizing tactics and refusing to cooperate with them.
We don't beat Alinsky by becoming him. We defeat it by revealing the game, telling the fact and relying on the Constitution, nonsubjective reality and moral clarity.
Evil flourishes in confusion. He's dying in the light.
If you want to realize how we got here, start with Saul Alinsky. If you want to end this, halt pretending it's normal.
It's not.
And it doesn't happen here unless we let it.
Only that we are in the mediate of a military colour revolution that uses quite a few strategies and methods of the Alinka, and a large adequate group of manipulated and radicalized useful idiots even puts into this demolition of America from the mediate of the psyop.
Don't do it.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/color-revolution-origins-why-the?
![Urząd skarbowy skontroluje osoby, które wysłały taki przelew. Wystarczy choćby mała kwota [18.02.2026]](https://warszawawpigulce.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Pieniadze-banknoty-wazne200i1003888.webp)
