Good jokes should be funny, but they should besides lead to thinking, to deeper reflection. The bunny ordered a cookie and coffee at the cafe. erstwhile the waiter brought the order to the table, the bunny had to go to the bathroom. erstwhile he came back, he saw the cup was empty. Nervous, he shouted his squeaky voice at the full cafe: who drank my coffee! From the next table a bear rose and a dangerous, tubular voice said: me. Then the bunny pulled out a plate toward him and asked meekly, "How about a cookie?"
A fewer days after the swearing in of Donald Trump to the U.S. President's Office began, announced during the election campaign, deportations. The staff of the national Immigration and Customs Office (ICE) expelled a group of about 80 Colombians from the country who were in the US illegally and committed various types of crimes and offences. They were sent by 2 military aircraft to the capital of Colombia Bogotá. However, the Colombian authorities denied pilots the right to land in their country. Donald Trump then announced that he would impose a 25% work on all goods imported from Colombia immediately. After a week, as he announced, this work was to be increased to 50%. Following this declaration by Trump, Colombia's president Gustavo Petro abolished the previously issued landing ban and asked the U.S. administration the question: will you deliver the deported Colombians to Bogotá alone, or should we send our aircraft for them?
Only a strong state and a strong leader can afford specified a policy, a policy from the position of a powerful bear. Is Poland specified a country? Does Poland have specified leaders? 1 should anticipate Donald Tusk to at least effort to imitate his name Donald Trump and announce a strong policy of the Polish government against the increasing hazard of illegal refugees coming to Poland. But alternatively of specified a declaration, we experienced a compromising entry in social media, in which Tusk referred to the deportation efforts of the American administration as follows: "I asked Radosław Sikorski to prepare our consulates for the possible consequences of these decisions.”.
Why is this entry embarrassing? due to the fact that Tusk confuses basic concepts or deliberately tries to make confusion. Therefore, to prevent this confusion, basic concepts must be arranged. An immigrant or a exile can get into a country in 2 ways. The first is to legally cross the border at the border crossing point. In this case, the entry rules in force in the country must be complied with. For example, the United States of America collects additional fingerprints from all entry. In this way , each entry individual shall be identified and entered into the national registration strategy . The second way to get to a country is to illegally cross the border. If a individual crossing the border in this way is not detained or himself is not reported to a exile centre, he is out of control in a country outside the system.
And that's the basic difference that leftist-liberal politicians and media service effort to blur. The second crucial issue is the legal position of the individual who legally entered the country. Each country shall find the maximum duration of legal residence. After that time, it is usually 3 months, the visitor should leave the country. This is the second very crucial issue, namely exceeding this time, which is the illegal extension of residence in a given country. In many countries, specified as the United States or the United Kingdom, the rule of acceptance is applied in specified cases, but under certain conditions. due to the fact that specified persons can work, pay taxes, send children to schools, benefit from wellness care and are not deported, even though the state administration has cognition of their status. But until then. Until a crime or offense has been committed, frequently seemingly minor, specified as speeding. The countries applying this rule thus complement the shortcomings in their labour market, but besides get very disciplined citizens who know that the slightest misconduct will cost them dearly, not a mandate or a fine, but deportation.
As you can see, people who have crossed the border legally, but have extended their stay beyond the allowed period, are residing illegally in the country, but their position is completely different from those who crossed the border illegally. These cases must not be combined or mixed. I'm going to compare that, figuratively, to a situation that I think everyone has encountered in their lives. Everyone may have been invited to their home, who felt so well that they just sat down. It's getting late, the hosts are tired, but the guests don't think to leave. Has anyone in this situation always asked these guys out? Unless they started throwing plates, pounding glasses, or trashing our apartment. But no 1 in their right head compares invited guests, even if they sat extra long, to bandits who broke the fence, broke the windows, or broke the door and forced them into our apartment. Is it truly hard to separate between these 2 cases?
Unfortunately Donald Tusk tries to confuse us and scares the deportation of Poles from the United States. Yes, there is simply a group of our countrymen who have extended their stay in the United States beyond their permitted period and have not yet obtained the right to permanent residence. But as far as we know, everyone or almost everyone was legally in the United States. Poles did not force the Mexican-American border. The law of permanent residence in the United States is called a green card. You can see Donald Tusk does not separate between the word "green card" and the usual word "green border". Finally, we live in a time erstwhile the adjective "green, green" gives a new, definitely meliorative sense to the words to which it is added.
There utilized to be a game called green. Each player committed to carrying something green. erstwhile you meet specified a player somewhere, should you be politely sure, asking: "Do you play green?" erstwhile he answered yes, should we ask, ‘Do you have green’? In order not to lose, the associate had to answer “mam” while showing something green he had on him. Donald Tusk announced in his parliament exposé that no 1 in the European Union would win him. I have the impression that the Prime Minister meant playing green. Is it possible that at each gathering Ursula von der Leyen asks Donald Tusk: Do you play green? erstwhile he says, "I'm playing," Ursula says, "Do you have green?" Which Donald answers: I have, I have on my government's agenda the introduction of green order and the sealing of the green border.
Poles are naturally hospitable. But they will not let themselves be persuaded to treat Polish and EU borders of illegal refugees as invited guests. Poles have not been so fooled by propaganda that they are “Poor people who search their place on earthIt’s okay. ” Poles are besides accustomed to the fact that erstwhile rulers neglect them, they do not grow up to be statesmen, they take matters into their own hands. Poles know what freedom is, and that freedom must be defended. More than 12 million people participated in Donald Tusk's referendum on Poland's admission of refugees, including nearly 4.5 million people who did not vote for the United Right. 12 million are little than half of the eligible, but by far more than half of the voters. So there are millions of us, we will defend our families, we will defend our homes, we will defend Poland.
Mr Bogdan
