The PiS politician made his wishes from the detention. He mentioned “injustice”

Member of the Law and Justice Dariusz Matecki published Easter wishes on social media.

The politician was detained in early March by interior safety Agency officers in connection with irregularities in the Justice Fund.

Easter. Dariusz Matecki made “the wishes of the detention”. He mentioned Tusk and Bodnar

Dariusz Matecki pointed out that these were ‘the wishes of the detention’, and he described himself as “a political prisoner of the Government of Tusk and Bodnar”.

"This year's Easter Day comes to me to spend in a place that should never become a symbol of political repression," he wrote.

Mr PiS stated that “the injustice he is experiencing is proof of how much Poland under Donald Tusk and Adam Bodnar moving distant from freedom and the regulation of law‘.

"But Easter is simply a time of hope and triumph of fact over lying. It's a vacation that teaches us that even the top darkness cannot extinguish the light, and suffering and injustice are only a step on the way to the triumph of good“ We keep reading.

Matecki stated that “just as Christ defeated death, so did we. We will defeat those who effort to silence us and destruct real, sovereign Poland.”

Matecki made his Easter wishes. He talked about “hope for an early gathering in free Poland”

The politician wished "the strength, perseverance and courage—the same as our ancestors who fought for freedom and dignity."

“Let the risen Christ bring you joy, peace and strengthening in religion that The fact always wins. Thank you for your memory, support and prayer. They give me the strength to endure and not give in to those who want me to silence“ Matecki added. Finally, Mr Pis expressed hope for “Fish gathering in free Poland‘.

Let us remind you that with respect to irregularities in the Justice Fund Darius Matecki was charged with six counts., threatened with imprisonment of up to 10 years. The prosecutor found it essential to arrest a Member‘out of legitimate concern about the unlawful effect of the proceedings’.