Not many have noticed this, but we are on the verge of the next phase of the centralisation of the European Union, continuing the way out of the way for a superstate.
Formally nothing changes – everything remains the same in EU treaties. The rule of delegation of powers is inactive theoretical, whereby the Union has only as many prerogatives as the associate States have agreed to give it. likewise to the rule of subsidiarity, which states that only those problems which cannot be dealt with at a lower national level should be addressed at a higher level. But rules for yourself and practice for yourself. For years now, this has been a step-by-step removal of competences from the hands of the States and their transfer to Brussels by means of successive directives, regulations and judgments of the TEU effectively "fallifying" provisions of the Lisbon Treaty.
This time, as an icebreaker, the sovereignty of the associate States was decided to usage the next EU budget perspective. First of all, the proposed Multiannual Financial Framework for the years 2028-2034 is to undergo far-reaching consolidation. alternatively of the existing about 540 different EU policies and programmes, 27 National and Regional Partnership Plans will be created. In itself, this solution would not even be wrong, but it did harm the intentions of this extremist improvement of EU funds. The consolidation of the European budget has been full linked to the rule of "money for the regulation of law" already known to us. To date, it has functioned fragmentedly (e.g. in relation to the KPO), but since the Brussels mandarins have proven to be a tool of force that effectively disciplines countries specified as Poland, it has been decided to apply it overall, for all Eurofunds. Illustrationally speaking: experiments on the experimental ground, what were the conditions for granting funds from the Next Generation EU mechanism, successful? So it is time to implement the tested solutions on a mass scale!
Looking for a fresh home, investment, lifestyle? With Agent HMTV, it's easy!
According to the draft presented by the European Commission, payments in all 27 areas of the Partnership Plans will depend on compliance with the regulation of law, implementation of the reforms imposed by the Union and compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights. This clearly gives the EU’s office arms in the form of unrestricted financial blackmail, due to the fact that these “rules of the regulation of law”, an assessment of the advancement made in implementing reforms, not to mention the Charter of Fundamental Rights, will be subject to a purely discretionary explanation of Eurocommissioners. Given the clear, left-wing-liberal political and ideological orientation of Brussels, it can be assumed in advance that funds will be granted or received "after consideration" – according to the political-ideological key mentioned above. In another words, the issue of funds will depend not so much on whether a given state is actually law-abiding, but on who rules it.
This arbitraryness of Brussels blackmail has already been felt on our own in at least 2 cases. In the microscale, this active local governments who dared to accept declarations in defence of the conventional family. announcement – these were not even legal acts in the strict sense of the concept, but simply worldview statements. This, however, was adequate for EU officials to hold off the payments to the local authorities, which led them to retreat from the "unrighteous" declaration 1 by one. The second example, much more serious, is the blocking of funds from the KPO. The Polish government made a number of concessions agreed with Brussels, accepted absurd “milestones” – yet the money remained frozen. They were only thawed erstwhile Poles voted “right” by giving power to those whom Brussels wished. Then it abruptly turned out that Polish regulation of law is on the right course, despite the fact that the law did not change even by a jota.
The intention of disciplining and blackmailing the insubordinately open text was revealed by Commissioner for Justice, the regulation of law and democracy Michael McGrath in an interview with “Deutsche Welle”, saying: “Neither 1 euro will be transferred to countries where the regulation of law is not respected”. This is peculiarly interesting with respect to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as Poland has benefited from the alleged British Protocol, i.e. the opt-out clause, which reserves, inter alia, the exclusion from the jurisdiction of the TEU on the provisions of the Charter and the application of any of its provisions. Will the European Commission honour this clause? On the another hand, does the EC decide to launch financial sanctions against Germany, where judges do not have immunity, at the national level they are set up by political groups, and in the Länder mostly by local justice ministers? Both questions are rhetorical. In practice, we will have a well-known rule: money for the regulation of law “as we realize it”.
