talks with trolls and more
It was March 24-25 on the "Girls" page
The deficiency of the first Prscrin on which was the text I referred to in the posts, it seems that individual removed it from my disk,
Just as I can't find a post on a group or fnpage fb, due to the fact that I most likely got a ban, I besides checked the diary of fb activity - there's nothing ... so all deleted...
I first made a pictorial post and originally only wanted to limit myself to it - there was a text on the image about abortion and min. there was a sentence:
"Your body always belongs to you, besides erstwhile you're pregnant",
which of course is actual and which evidently has nothing to do with abortion (hence my opinion on the clock),
But then I commented on the text as you can see on the photograph below, and 2 days I was swamped with spam as you can see on the pictures.
After all, they wanted to go away.
there is besides a scrin, where I write, why I look at this page - to see that they usage verwolf methods here, i.e. no logical answers, no arguments, only constant repetition
This full web page is about constant avalanche repetition of defined besides - we know this from another examples, which already clearly demonstrates who and for what intent runs this website and all propaganda in another media
The abortionists are trying to narrow down the subject to the false thesis: "my belly is my business" or "the baby is like a kidney, so I can do whatever I want."
Which, of course, is not true, due to the fact that it's not the belly, it's the baby in the stomach, and--
Because a kid does not come out of nowhere, only a kid has a father -
But since abortionists GUGERUCE differently, they effort to push their father's subject to the background and "split" gibberish, to not gotta answer the paternity argument,
I'm the 1 who skips their attacks. And I'm talking about whether or not a human is partenogenesis - since the baby is like a kidney...
So let them prove that in humans there is simply a virgin and the kid itself appears in the body of a woman
It's expected to make them confirm and agree with me that the baby has a father
Therefore, discussions cannot be limited to issues: this is simply a woman's decision,
Because a kid does not belong solely to a woman...
And here's another phrase utilized by "girls," which is:
"You are the 1 who bears the consequences of your choices."
- You have a kid from WHO, who might want you to have this baby - you know that due to sex, you can get pregnant, you're an adult, you make a choice, and then you have consequences
Abortion and Father's Rights.
Dr Monika Brzozowska-Pasieka
Exactly!
It seems that the answer to this may be protection provided under alleged individual property - the right to establish a relation with a child.
Second: fresh The concept of individual good in the form of the right to household ties between closest household members has already been established in the Polish system. It is simply a individual good which is protected by Articles 23 and 24 of the civilian Code. Thus, in court judgments thesis that an open catalogue of individual property besides includes the good in the form of a peculiar emotional and emotional bond between parents, children and siblings, the right to live in a full household and to cultivate household ties.
Third: personal welfare may be expressed in relation to the parent with the nasciturus (unborn child). Regarding the death of the conceived child This is peculiarly highlighted by the ultimate Court ruling of 9 March 2012 in the message of reasons which the Court of First Instance indicated that there is no uncertainty that From the minute of conception, an unborn kid may be treated by parents as their already having child, which in turn causes certain emotional bonds and feelings for an unborn kid to be fulfilled. This assessment is influenced not only by the life span of the kid in the mother’s body, but besides by the subjective attitude of parents to anticipate the offspring and how they prepare for the birth of the child. It is so crucial that each parent’s attitude to the unborn child, whether it was expected, wanted, and what hopes they had for him or her..
Fourth: the case law frequently grants compensation to parents - pursuant to Article 448 of the civilian Code - in the event of a breach or break of this household and emotional relationship.
Fifth: Article 24 of the civilian Code indicates that this, whose individual well-being is threatened by another people's actions may request that this act be neglected unless it is not unlawful. What does this mean in practice? If the child's parent is wrongfully intending to reconcile her father's individual welfare (i.e. the right to a household relation with the unborn child) the father may request a judicial ban on specified action. Why? due to the fact that the death of Nasciturus causes a violation of his father's individual property.
However, it should be stressed again that we are talking about a situation where women's actions are illegal. In case abortion is carried out on the basis of the condition set out in Article 4a(1) of the household Planning Act (the pregnancy is the consequence of rape or endangers the life of the mother), it is hard to talk about the unlawfulness of the mother's action. However, if a child’s parent violates the law, doing so would besides constitute a violation of her father’s individual property. So if a female had performed an illegal abortion, then, outside the criminal case, the child's father could, in principle, claim property in the form of, for example, compensation.
The decision to have an abortion is not just a woman's decision, it is not a question of someone's "belly" or "nerry".
"I'm not going anywhere":
Right Eye: Note October 2024
Right Eye: An impasse
Right Eye: Letters to M.
