The bubbling words of a Koszalin judge. “The reason for life has come to nothing”

• In December 2013, 31-year-old Mr. Marcin then got off the train at the station in Swidwin, slipped and fell under the train. If it weren't for the immediate reaction of another travellers, he'd have lost his life.
• The judge, arguing for his judgement in the case, stated that ‘until the time of the accident you had reached nothing’ and now he has a fresh partner
• “Many judges are separated from reality and feeling superior. How can 1 say specified a thing in the justification?”
• More specified stories can be found on the Onetu homepage

In December 2013, 31-year-old Mr Marcin then got off the train at the station in Świdwin. It was dark, the platform was snowy and icy. The man slipped and fell under the train. If it wasn't for the immediate reaction of another travelers, he would have lost his life. It ended “only” with the leg amputation.

The man went to court for justice. More than 10 years after the day of the tragic event, a conviction was handed down. It was handed out by justice Piotr Walenciak.

Judge to plaintiff: until the accident in your life you have reached nothing

Although the man received PLN 500 1000 in financial compensation, the justification in the face of the tragedy may surprise him.

— Until the time of the accident, the reason for his life had come to nothing — the judge’s reasoning and continued: — And after the accident? She has a fresh partner, she has been in a fresh relation for 5 years, and she has a low level of depression,” he said, without a shadow, a typical of the judiciary.

At the same time, he stressed that as a justice he had the right to do so. — I will justify it as I see it. Mr. Martin has done well in his life. PLN 208 1000 for an individual prosthetic? We request to know whether you request a mercedes prosthesis or if you request enough, as the orthopedics say, in the volkswagen class for PLN 60,000 – the justice Piotr Walenciak wondered.

— highly controversial, he assessed the judgement and justification of the plaintiff's lawyer Kamil Syposzyński. Marcin Maroszołek of the “Wokanda” association did not hide his outrage. — To justify the understatement of damages by the fact that a individual could handle himself is, to be gentle, an abuse on the part of a court.

The Messenger of the Left does not hold outrage. “Many judges are separated from reality”

The outrage of the justice is not covered by the MP Anna Maria Żukowska. "Most average people, proceeding it, don't care if he was neo or paleo (this 1 is non-neo). Just quite a few judges are disconnected from reality and full of superiority. How can 1 say specified a thing in the justification?”

She added: “If the justice were without a chain and a toga, then after a bleached form of speech and the language of the body saying, “What the hell do you want from me, I am a judge” and the cynical speech of “the judgement is not final”, 1 could uncertainty what a profession he represents.”

The conviction is not final.