Dagmara and Pawel Drozd won in Strasbourg before ETPCz. The thing described, among others, via OKO.pressconcerns a long and unfortunately lost run which the citizens of Poland conducted over the years – alone, how many of their actions
It began on July 10, 2016, erstwhile the PiS reached the case of the Constitutional Court, and a large protest movement awakened at the turn of 2015 and 2016 went on vacation. Only 10 people stood in front of the main entrance to the Sejm building with a dozen-metre-long inscription “Treats the homeland who breaks its highest law”. They were attacked by marshals, and in these circumstances the first “sitting protest” took place during the regulation of the Law and Justice.
After this event Kuchciński – the then marshal – changed the rules of the Sejm by introducing the anticipation of refusing admission. For safety reasons or for the anticipation of violating the seriousness of the Sejm. In practice, the Marshal's defender issued yearly bans on entry to the Sejm due to the "weight of the Sejm" – and this 1 violated e.g. the improvement of the white-red flag in the premises of the Sejm squares (the decision was obtained in writing by Konrad Korzenowski). In many cases among Polish citizens, the “recision” ban was extended, adding further years.
In this way the practice of limiting the constitutional rights of the citizen (freedom of word, access to information about the work of the authorities of power) was born without a court ruling and without any anticipation to challenge that decision and appeal it. Administrative courts considered themselves inappropriate to settle due to the fact that the marshalry defender is not an administration.
All these things ETPCz considered violation of the convention. Yesterday [6.04.2023 – ed.] message made me a day. Dagmar and Paul I am grateful for the incredible stubbornness in this substance (and for the considerable costs they have chosen to bear for her).
However, this does not change the fact that we are dealing with another neglected case.
A tiny thing to win would be highly easy. ♪ Just that ♪o man with banner will be joined by parliamentarian, capturing his another end and the defender does not intervene. During the years of the Law and Justice, specified a thing happened twice. 2 or 3 parliamentarians holding hands effectively besides defend the demonstrating citizen from harassing him. Parliamentarians can thus introduce any number of demonstrators to Kuchciński's "forbidden land".
Our attempts to fight against the ban were of no interest to the media, although we besides fought for journalists who were besides denied entry. The ban on Kuchciński could be demeaned in Barejov as it deserves. It could be shown one more time that repression could be stopped and concessions enforced. However, it seems to be just our hobby – in the case of the Drozd household rather costly at the same time.
Parliamentarians make their parliamentary vows to the constitution knowing that at the same time it was broken on someone's backs. I'm a small surprised. I'd say no as long as there's no parliamentary orders. The refusal shall consequence in the nullity of the mandate. Let them worry about it. The Rules of Procedure of the Sejm and its effects are illegal. They break the Constitution and the Convention on Human Rights and the Citizen. The Court has just confirmed that.
He accepts this state of affairs anyone who, by undergoing the procedure of the Marshal defender politely stands in the window, receives a pass and goes to a gathering or commission in the buildings of the Sejm. They utilized to be called “striations”. present it is reasonable to realize them – I understand, although I do not know what crucial matters can be dealt with in the Sejm, giving up supposedly secondary symbols of democracy and freedom – and saving criticisms.
But something more has happened – not only are they not scabs any more, those who politely take passes and "respect the seriousness of the Sejm", but those who "walk" and fight like the people on Barea's list do not serve." I am a associate of the “charch”, and I am arrogant of that.
In the picture: Warsaw, July 21, 2016 at the Sejm
