Last 1 like this?

26 July, entry No 1367 Jerzy Karwelis

Principle ‘follow the money’ It's becoming more universal. Following money is not only utilized to catch affluents, but it is equally effective in tracking political intentions, i.e. ...affiliators of the higher level. The careful analysis of state budgets straight shows the full scope of intentions to be implemented by the authorities. usually budget debates are boring, unfortunately they attract more audiences of causative scandals and emotions than analyses of the ruling intentions spelled in the tables. And these are prophetic debates, due to the fact that if you perceive to them, you can see not only the intentions of the authorities, but besides the directions in which they worship the social groups they choose.

Recently, 1 of the first to be held was a fitting to the Union budget for the period 2028-2034 There, the intentions of the authorities were very clear, although experts are convinced that they are signs of excessive growth, so that there is simply a Union to "get out of" in this almost two-year process of budget negotiations. But the intentions were clear, mostly in the budgets of the states in place of supported and sunk social groups in the case of the Brussels budget, although, as in the leftist budgets, and specified an organisation seems to be the European Union, there is besides a class approach: 1 class goes up second. But let's start with the essence of the budget.

Change of paradigm

The structure of the budget shows the overall return and this is not only a return to the national State, but to the State in which Berlin will be “the centre” in Berlin. The Union gives up its priorities, withdraws more resources from its core programmes: Cohesion Fund and agricultural subsidies. These, so far the basic, funds had their crucial justification for the Union as a whole. First – Cohesion Fund – to compensate for the differences in the level of improvement of the different regions and associate States, so as to extend evenly the integration of pollinate states into the improvement of the Union as a whole. This idea, together with the full cohesion fund, was sold as an expression of European solidarity, 1 of the pillars of the alleged "European values", made Europeans a sovereign of a unified, supported and unified developmental ambition into 1 cosmopolitan people.

The current abandonment of improvement priorities, or actually the differences that are falling asleep in the improvement work, is now justified for growth – it is explained to us that the countries have already reached an equal level of improvement and there is no request to push money there, especially as they were spent on old-school investments in hard infrastructure, i.e. concrete and steel, roads, communication and transport accessibility. Now, as EU experts say, we have reached an equivalent level of this hard improvement base, we can now decision on to support improvement not in the area of "old" infrastructure, but to shift these funds to support fresh technologies, including digitisation.

We have a fewer objections here. someway I do not see that members, especially the most fresh ones, someway rapidly scope an equal level, especially in infrastructure. The EU is inactive full of developing countries, especially infrastructure. small – the "old" Union is besides infrastructurally collapsing. Even in economically arrogant Germany, there are delays in the restoration of simple infrastructure specified as roads, highways, bridges, and simpler things specified as broadband access. So it's not truly how to wrap up this cohesion agenda.

Furthermore, it is clear that these funds were not meant to be an equation to the average, but to support EU measures to make the infrastructure of countries which are strategically crucial for the interests of the German economy. For example, we have benefited from this due to the fact that specified road constructions were supported by EU funds for reasons of relevance for German policy. It consisted of 2 elements: the safety of the logistics of the economical exchange of Germany with Russia and the easy transfer of semi-finished products of the Polish economy to Germany, which realised the appropriate margin. It was an old idea. Mitteleurops, where the countries of Central Europe were to supply production facilities, peripheral and complementary to the German economy and required an easy logistical safeguard of this idea. another countries – not along the way, especially on the German-Russia trade line, were not so lucky, and there the EU's money to catch up with the level of infrastructure did not appear so generously.

Class budget aspect

In my view, the tactically temporary collapse of Germany's trade with Russia, specified expenditure is no longer justified by Germany, and so these measures will go elsewhere, due to the fact that the fresh budget of the Union will like 2 directions – digitization and military spending. The second area, after the Cohesion Fund, which will be at the expense of agricultural subsidies. That's where the most of it is. France and Poland will mostly lose on this. But if agriculture dies in the Union, what will we eat? We'll be in ticks, a vise with 2 ingredients: east and west. Not only will the deficiency of subsidies finish European agriculture, but there will be 2 more things – internally and cost-effectively it will be green madness, which will drive EU agricultural production, and externally it will be extra conditions for Ukrainian and South American food imports.

This is where the mentioned class element. The progressive Union has been fighting the peasantry from the very beginning, as the rationale for the worst flaws facing progress. They are 2 components – alternatively a conservative approach to traditions and values and the most hated thing by progressives – property most measurable due to the fact that it is land property. So this class is to be exterminated in many ways, from the travel of overregulation, especially environmental production, through the fight against smaller farms to the simplification of this social group through the cultural attractiveness of the urban alternate to young people.

So, paradoxically, European farmers will die, but there will be plenty to eat, due to the fact that food will decision from 2 directions. 1 – Ukrainian – where large agricultural corporations (American and European) will gain in the farming of farms with the size of respective Polish provinces. The second direction is Mercosur, or the agreement with South America, where the exchange will take place – cheaper food in exchange for European, or, in fact, German, goods that no longer come down, even in Europe itself, an example of which is German automotive epilepsy.

And, strangely enough, it will take place in the fumes of full hypocrisy, as 1 of the factors for destroying European agriculture will be the utopia of green order. And at the same time, both Ukraine and South America will stink as much as possible, not to mention pushing their GMO products. These 2 fresh import directions, at the collapse of home production, will exposure Europeans to a failure of food safety as they will deprive Europe of sovereignty in food production for many years. Long, due to the fact that it will take that long to reconstruct the cut-out stock of agricultural production, not to mention the failure of farm competence.

Therefore, support for the improvement of the basic infrastructure of the aspiring countries and support for agriculture, which – nota bene – as a drug, through the strategy of subsidies have led to agricultural deprivation, due to the fact that what is different is corrupting farmers by paying them for nothing, forcing land to fall, or introducing stupidities at the level of biodiversity. The simplification in agricultural subsidies is simply a Copernican coup in the past of the EU budget, which means that Brussels is no longer afraid of the states of the ‘new Union’ or the class of farmers as such. And possibly they got there that these 2 factors – 1 state, the another class – are pacified adequate to not jump. And possibly they're right.

What in return?

Such "saved" resources will go to 2 areas: digitization and militarisation. Let's start with the celebrated digitalization. Now. Lisbon strategy She promised that we would catch up with America and China in this respect and pursuit it away. So what happened after these twenty-five years – we see. The planet has driven Europe by respective lengths and it is not surprising: it is always as improvement is made by officials. After all, they are the EU's agents, deciding what it will do. So he goes to the rabbit’s “colleagues” – just look at the results of the multibillion Horizon Europe Fund, where multimillion-dollar grants are fought for completely causal projects, money is burned for global investigation work having nothing to do with innovation, fresh technologies or digitization. These, if at all, are done in Europe by private companies, who are fighting their budgets with gargantua public subsidies for projects commissioned by officials to officials for which the technological investigation sphere is increasingly doing research.

This is how dense billions were burned down, which in a private economy would yield a 100 times better results, even by lowering taxes. But who forbids the rich? Now we're going to push into digitization. But with the decline of innovation, what's it gonna take? The only area in the Union is the digitisation of social control. This process has accelerated considerably in the Kovid era and we are witnessing in this respect the implementation of the promised "new normality". This ‘normality’ is not normal, but ‘new’. experimentation with siding control it worked rather well, but it was not finished – the blacksmith killed the war in Ukraine and with the implementation of the full digitalization of social control is only waiting for a fresh pretext, stimulated as usual by fear.

And that will go with the money “for digitization”. And even here it will not be the flower of our European innovation, but products purchased from Chinese or Israeli shelves. And as I know these directions, not only will these products service European purposes, but they will give them to non-European producers full insight into the collection and aggregation of data on European behaviour – a strategically precedence origin of planet War III, which is now being continued in hybrid form.

Digitalisation will besides be a domain content control under the pretext of tracking haters in speech, writing and painting. but that it will besides be for another people's money, due to the fact that specified digitalisation will only be designed to control the full platforms of alleged social media, which under fresh EU law are already being forced to control themselves, in terms of tracking hatred speech. The concept itself is rubber enough, and the penalties for not tracking it so severe that the platforms will apply preventive censorship themselves. So much digitalization.

militaria.eu

The second area supported by the Union budget will be defence. but it's a selective fund. They're expected to gain Germany and the French. That's it. This can be seen from the assumptions, in addition to already applied, in ReArm Europe fund. The criteria for European production considered to be worth EU backing were established: these are the percent thresholds for non-European production shares, the excess of which disqualifies from funding. So right now, and even more so after this mechanics has started, it's possible to spend money on these funds German or French products.

Also interesting is the current structure of this fund – part of the loans a la KPO, i.e. we borrow domestically, but what we can spend it on is Brussels. The second component is to come from loosening the limits of associate States' debt, which is again – we will be able to borrow to possibly buy war toys from the "engine of Europe", i.e. the Germans and the French, as the European Commission will decide. So in both cases, a stream of EU money, not the first time, will be diverted to Berlin.

This number is only possible if, for example, specified Poland does not have its own production base for militarites. Its structural weakness is simply a grim past of the continuity of negligence of the full III of Poland. Somehow, by chance, all attempts to correct the Polish armories were strangely landed in bushes, as was the construction of the Polish atomic power station.

Clearly, individual cares about our deficiency of sovereignty, both energy and military. And this “someone” always manages to find local, Polish supporters of specified activities. We so stay in this respect in the sphere of continuous discussions, without being translated into action.

This Europeanisation of militarisation will cancel our EU support, better or worse, but any plans to buy weapons. We have spoken outside Europe (because where were we expected to get, how are the production of the European arms manufacture not being expelled?) and we will not fund this for the above reasons from EU funds, so we will gotta buy for our own, while Germany or the French will buy for themselves, for their own... ours. And that's the state-class budget. But he has a fewer more aspects to show what awaits us.

Hura budget

I want a evidence budget. 2 1000 billion euros. We know what he's going to do, but the fact and intent of his distension are interesting. I do not even want to complain about these Polish bogies (note – equally on the COPIS side), who boast that we have a evidence budget in the Union and Poland will benefit from it. As you can see in the military not so much, but in digital, if this is to be only an instrument of control, it may not be so much better to enjoy? In general, it is simply a joy to know that somewhere out there, any organization of a "virtual community" will have more of our money for political impact on the associate States can only enjoy cynics or unwise ones.

How does this put together specified a evidence budget erstwhile contributions are indirectly dependent on the economical situation of the associate States? Yeah, as we know, Europe is getting worse, so where is this evidence surplus coming from? Mainly, ladies and gentlemen with the alleged Union's own revenue. Thus, taxation to the associate States. I don't even want to remind you that our main pioneer in this substance was Prime Minister Mateusz, inactive in early smithies. Then it went like butter, specified as a taxation on plastic for Brussels, paid by all countries, justified by the environmental idea, and the request for the Union to make a debt fund under the pledge of the obligations of the associate States was justified by the request to rebuild the continent after the boat rage.

The example of the KPO (in Polish, in European: the "new generation European fund", or the construction of the fresh World) is crucial here. We were expected to get paid for this money from the collapse of the economy, mainly tiny entrepreneurs – the most common victims of lockdowns – and the money went to know why for windmills, subsidies for electrical cars and landscape-forming photovoltaic farms. I won't mention rainbow equality funds for politeness. And so it will be now – under the blackmail of fear, this time of war, he will borrow who is to borrow, and he will gain what is to earn. And that's the budget.

That is why it is big, due to the fact that we will request to borrow fresh areas for the implementation of the abovementioned areas. The dam of “own incomes” was spectacularly scratched behind a coin, and it is breaking in front of our eyes by voting elected representatives of the people of the dying continent. Paradoxically, the Germans who are filming all this will receive a continent ruined in the decline of their imperial aspirations, but who would be worried about the colony as long as they supply what they want from them?

But it may be amazing that the joy of this situation, the pride of the “recorded budget”. This is the joy of carp's Christmas week extension. You just can't look at specified a stupid thing. How do you enjoy raising taxes, and not 1 of them will come back to us? On the contrary, our taxes will be utilized to build the power of a state with interests increasingly conflicting with our state's rations, if this exists in the minds of Polish politicians.

Poland trendsetter

In the budget there is besides an thought already tested on Poles. It is the regulation of law which has been practiced on us since the beginning of the Kaczyński Government. The experimentation has succeeded and can now be implemented across the Union, as shown in the budget. The final criterion for receiving any funds from the evidence budget will be compliance with the regulation of law criteria. And this is where we hit a fewer mines.

First of all – what this lawfulness is, nobody knows. The example of Poland showed that this is irrelevant, as it is simply a virtual criterion. I will remind you that Poland was deprived of access to EU funds in times of the regulation of Law and Justice, which it borrowed from itself due to the fact that it did not meet the criteria of the regulation of law. Pal licho whether it is actual or not, but as shortly as power changed, it immediately became Poland's regulation of law country, although nothing has changed in the organisation of the regulation of law infrastructure since the Law and Justice era. Only power has changed, more like Berlin. It is actual that the access to EU funds has not opened automatically (to date we have provided about 15% of the funds allocated to us under the KPO) – that is, it has only gone in green-tailed directions (mostly in the grant section), due to the fact that for "real" projects, if any, we can inactive effort with the debt part of the KPO.

In this way, the regulation of law so tested becomes an aggressive tool, with which, as can be seen from Poland, the European Commission can influence the governments of the associate States in all aspect, exerting force on them in spheres completely outside the accession treaties. Thus, the centre of management of European countries moves to uncontrolled bodies, and thus political elections in individual countries become a façade for naive people. The Commission is gaining full power over the continent through these mechanisms. What paradoxical countries regulation is an organization with a budget not exceeding (even in the evidence budget of 2 trillion) 1.5% of the full GDP of all associate States. This is done by the Commission, not by means of money, but by means of regulations affecting local policies, and by expanding the public's propaganda of the money that lies and waits, but only of the law-givers. Whatever that means in the EU fresh York.

But this aspect of Brussels' car hire has an extended effect. This is no longer about keeping countries politically uncomfortable. This is about strengthening the process of unification of the Union into a national state. The command center is here, so it's time to consolidate the budget. Even mediocre Commissioners from the European Commission They're sorry.that they do not have access to the full budget, there is no, note!, Commissioner for Budgets (Polish). This is only from reporting to the European Parliament the propedeutic doses of the budget set in a narrow group of "older and wiser".

The European Commission so has the ambition of equipping Europe's fresh management centre with all the attributes of power: regulation is an aspect of a centralised budget, which is increasingly derived from the taxation of peripherals. Contributions were inactive any fig leaf of equality between entities, while taxation on behalf of the centre is already proof of centralization of power by forced violence, for now regulatory.

Last specified inn

We know – discussions on this budget will take about 2 years and much can change. But you can see where intentions are going. And I propose here that this will be the last specified budget. And it's not about its size or structure. It's something else – the principle. If, following specified a budget, everything goes this way, we will scope a border situation. Either the next budget will be the budget of the federalised state (socialist) of European republics, or it will be the last budget of the Union, due to the fact that it itself will fall apart during the implementation of this budget. That is why, in my opinion, it will be the last budget, not this budget, but the last budget in general. And let everyone answer the question which version they prefer. In my opinion, there is neither time nor area for further rotting of this creature, due to the fact that its functional gangrene will already infect vital parts of our body.

So either we go into slavery or we cut off this sick creature. Even after his fall, it may be besides late for us. The mutilator will die with the host, and it's not good for us, the carriers of this EU hump, satisfaction.

He wrote and read Jerzy Karwelis

All entries on my blog "The diary of the plague".