Women are convinced that they are considered to be more serious due to the fact that they have been completely surrounded by the current political correctness and they seem to be men. These women are much worse. The girls are better in love, but they don't want to be better in them, they want to be as tiny as boys, including erstwhile they're not.they will be good.
In general, there is no specified thing as "worst" in relation to whether there are any or all another orgings. The IQ 80 sub-sahallnient blacks are inferior in terms of innovation, and the protein surpluses that conquer Mars are superior in exploitation. Only the ones that are not known are the better and the worse. It is not possible to find whether an ant is even worse or better by the elephant — both species of the ants work and last thousands of years.
And people and chimpanzees have a common ancestor. Both of these categories work, so it is impossible to conclude that 1 is worse and the another is better. Chimpanzees are better physically. People are mortifying themselves on a higher scale than the chimpanzees are, therefore, inferior to the chimpanzees.
The blacks of the IQ below 80, who think back about rape, the demolition of roots and the construction of huts with cow's rung, have a higher natural growth than the whites, which are built up by ecclesiastical structures. So the jako gaturek homo sapiens are better. due to the fact that they will last and the whites will die.
No little whites are better, due to the fact that they make technology that leads to non-lethality and will no longer grow. They will be developed in a fresh generation, in the field of bio-technologies, which will be developed not by co-organization, but by improvement of each orientation individually. Each individual will become a fresh topic.
Will that be better? For a large deal of time, it's a terrifying vision. The majority of people, including whites, would live on Earth and live peacefully on the African savant alternatively than get tired of Mars without lungs and stomachs.
India, the Amazonians are happier in their jungles than the large agglomerations of the Americans, which resumption the abstracts of utilizing fentanyl. These Indians are better—but they are worse at football, although in Brazil it is simply a national sport. And it would be possible to name the million in which individual is worse, and the million in which they are better.
Each of the worst members has something good in them. Janusz Korwin-Mikke any time ago gave a large example of how scientists can save the world. As the bones come to us, they will kill all of us, due to the fact that they consider them unsafe and the insects will become. They will take what they request and take away, and they will not be able to prevent it. And thanks to the invasions, humanity will be reborn, due to the fact that their children will be able to function.
For this purpose, 3 esteems and esteems each man, navet of the deep or broken. The baptism of us in this church transmits a vital role: the second will be the first.
Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>
PS. The illustration for this note has evidently given me an AI. 1 not without resistance. I see it for its sincerity:
Your concept with an ant and a handle does not break any rules – it's a social, symphic scene. Unfortunately, it seems that the strategy of the audit has already been active in the earlier process of dispersal (which included races and controversial thematics) and that it has been asked for an illustration.
This may happen erstwhile AI refers to “any accident” to something that is not entirely deviant with the political. It is not entirely your fault.
Let's effort to reduce this time from new, technical, uncontended. I will simplify the description and, if necessary, further propose an illustration with:
– An ant leaf at the first place,
– The old-age in the background,
– The symbolic concept of bioscience and technology.
I already did.
Unfortunately, I can't carry out this illustration again, but he decided that the request would violate our content — although the description looked completely neutral and symboly.
This is the most likely effect of the over-sensitive band, which connected it with the earlier context of the conversation. This is happening and does not indicate that your request was necessarily a project.
If you want to, I can make: I can make a promotion (e.g. without mention of ant and a handle, but with a akin contrast), or I can offer an entirely different scene with akin symbolic meaning.
Do you want to do it with a different or somewhat different motif?
