Victor Orban, while in Brussels, interviewed Radio Kossuthand he referred to respective burning issues in which he was able to talk against the current communicative as usual. As you can see, it can consistently be characterized by a separate opinion in subjects that can find not only the existence of its country but besides the full region, continent and European community. In addition, he points out that this consistent attitude can in the long word consequence in further strengthening of his rule, though, and there are any cracks which, according to various afraid analysts, may disturb the government of the Prime Minister of Hungary.
The referendum has decided
The leader of the country showed in an interview that it is possible to gain legitimacy for the decision of the authorities exercising the right of veto in this case. In an interview, he said "With over 2 million votes in the referendum in 2025, we stopped Ukraine from joining the European Union". He pointed out that he had previously stood alone like a celebrated lone Chinese protestor in the Tiennemen Square. But it was just later that a force of 2.2 million Hungarians appeared. He justified all this while knowing the hard situation of the Ukrainians that “We want to aid them, without destroying ourselves in this process.” Moreover, Ukraine is at war, which makes the accession process even more impossible. Talking about Ukraine's accession to the European Union as shortly as possible represents a direct threat.
You can't join NATO first.
Enthusiasts of the swift pursuit of Ukraine's accession not only to the European Union but besides to NATO in this case should realize what Orban said that this is not the time or place that favoured the first admission of Ukraine to NATO, as this would mean the 3rd planet War. In his opinion, this order was erstwhile indicated, as it guaranteed military safety before entering the European Union. But still, Hungary's position became NATO's majority.
Ursula von der Leyen as Brezhnev
Orban criticised EU structures that effort to enter the “old shoes” of times called by opponents of the east bloc “sometimes rightly past”. For he said "The European Union is more difficult; Brussels should only be a coordinating centre, but more and more it behaves like Moscow, sending instructions to Budapest". In his opinion, von der Leyen shows signs of ‘distortion’. He compared her behaviour to the russian face of the party. He besides stated that there was no request to fear Hungary's loneliness, as the temper could change first in Central Europe and later in Western countries.
The rainbow parade, however, took place
Orban stated that she considered his country subordinate and that so the request to let the organisation of the Equality Parade in Budapest meant de facto that "She thinks she can dictate to Hungarians from Brussels how to live, what they should like, what they should not like, what their legal strategy should be, what should be prohibited and what should not be." Despite assurances that this event must be registered by the police parade held and Orban met for this reason with large criticism. A fistful of people protested against A parade where many thousands of people attended. This serious crack in power is increasingly noticeable, and there is 1 conclusion here in the Hungarian media: "it should already be clear that no amendments to the Constitution or legal changes will prevent specified bright provocations from the awakened sex lobby, specified as the gay parade, unless average citizens take courage to regain their streets." And this 1 cannot cover Orban's rhetoric against these parades, which can begin to face different contradictions, which are increasing more and more in the country. And as you can see, the soft power of Orban's regulation is definitely losing to the sorosian force that can make more and more problems for the sovereign government.
Bartłomiej Doborzyński
