Optimum demography, effects of "majster break" actions. Will we be popular?

Optimum demography, effects of "majster break" actions. Will we be popular?

8 March 2024 Warsaw

It's all in your hands, due to the fact that you ladies have intuition. . .

The improvement of humanity, which is estimated to last from as much as 200 000 today. Years erstwhile it was expected to be the first time homo sapiens appeared in the world. Since then, man has embarked on an incredible journey; leaving Africa and passing through various geographical lands, the planet yet takes over. Historically through its past it passes through rich and drama-filled geological, climatic and civilizational processes, and these highly complex fates of the human species proceed to change and form our organisms, change the methods of life, and reactively to a changing environment besides model human genotype. This is possible due to the fact that we are inactive going on and on; firstly, thanks to the protection of the earth's biosphere, and secondly, through natural (but highly sophisticated, complex and complex) adaptation selection, which is highly patient and tested the effectiveness of all natural modifications so far. As we know, those whose organisms will first be born and then deal with the difficulties and dangers that exist. Here, there is simply a highly sophisticated and, as it turns out, inactive a mysterious mechanics of selection; through the existence of sex, organisms inactive vary and are flexiblely adapted to the conditions in which they live or in which they live. And it is that even on the low floors of biological complexity, the partners choose voluntarily, and this is done overwhelmingly, without rape, due to the fact that sexual selection is made through the action of potentials of procreation, but not entirely chaotic due to the fact that they are equipped with mechanisms of "auto forecasting-predicting" the reproductive effect of parents. A number of inherent possibilities of appropriate mating; let's say a full sphere of courtship, activates relationships with a peculiar partner, or, in another words, possible parents are equipped with a strategy to guide each another if they fit together genetically, and then the chance for good offspring is much greater than in relationships resulting from what happens, from another methods of mating, especially from rape ( In vitro in vitro fertilisation by the ICSI (intrathytoplasmic sperm injection) method is simply a rape, with the usage of a merciless needle, forced into the sacrum of femininity and motherhood - eggs, the waiting and having all the rights of a "prince of a fairy tale" and the best of 400,000,000 sperm beginning during natural love-lifts a journey to a glass mountain to its "prince", and through the ICSI, the injective rape receives genetic material which this egg voluntarily would never accept . . . due to the fact that as it turns out during natural action, the final decision to invitation a candidate belongs to the egg) .

The scale of reproductive success has different faces, first a healthy kid is born – it is the basis of success, and if parents have chosen well due to the fact that they have found their common adequacy in constantly changing conditions, their offspring will besides have a chance to carry these skills, and this is crucial from the point of view of the full population. In another words, good genes have a better chance of having their Continuum (including looking at the notes of optimism, regardless of the corruption that frequently occurs under the signs of advancement and modernity). Thanks to specified selection patterns, the population has a better chance of maintaining homeostasis, and thus besides of developing. Unfortunately, in cases dependent on man, these natural pathways to procreation do not always apply, due to the fact that in our case crucial roles in selection play cultural, technological and technological factors, which are the authors of which we ourselves are. Culture has a immense field of influence, it can support the improvement of future generations, but it can besides affect negatively from a genetic standpoint, through doctrines based on false ideologies. present it is very crucial to take the risks of utilizing the ART (in vitro) procedure very seriously, as well as abortion called mistakenly eugenic – due to the fact that these de facto make and disseminate genetic regression and behind it wellness and social, demographic, economical and civilizational problems. The magnitude of the effects of specified practices against nature cannot be predicted today, with needles and spoons, spoils the mechanisms protecting our human genetic heritage. This sad activity is dangerous due to the fact that there are no reliable documentations of the process, and its effects will only happen in the further future, in which all the aberrations introduced in the gene cycle will be highly hard to reverse due to the magnitude and complexity of informational human genetics. On how complex mechanisms decide about conception and how large the impact on the wellness of the population through genetic propagation, has its way of doing many works in the field of genetics. I urge many and available lectures, as well as articles on these topics of outstanding native geneticists, Prof. Stanisław Cebrat*) and Prof. Andrzej Kochanski**. Based on technological facts and statistical research, they inform against 2 major threats that disqualify artificial insemination methods as a threat to the reproductive possible of humanity, which may even lead to annihilation of the population:

The first danger is due to the proliferation of genetic defects, donors. Most frequently these are serious genetic defects, which, under natural conditions, activate mechanisms for protecting the pool of human genes and block specified reproduction, and this blockade takes place, among others, at the level of meiosis (gametes production). (In general, gametogenesis mechanisms defend the population from the calling to life of individuals with dangerous genetic defects, although for reasons of very advanced complexity these safety processes are not 100%).

The second threat is due to the fact that the in vitro procedure itself causes harm to genes, unfortunately due to the large complexity of the miracle of life, it is not known precisely what the scale of these harm is, and we have evidence that these identified are irreversible and will spread to the population, contributing to the proliferation of human disabilities and creating the hazard of destructive mutations.

The pseudo-eugenic procedures of pride, arrogance and another economical motivations*** are in fact somewhat correlated with the actual state of the problem. Ruging information and concealing facts already known about the effects of ART are a serious threat to humanity. Although in vitro treatments destruct our genotype contribute to the regression of human reproduction and human health, we are not informed about these consequences, on the contrary, ART lobbyists usage sneaky affirmative and aggressive propaganda by in vitro sowing misinformation in this basic for our continued field. Their advocates even hotel to manipulating and influencing the governments of the states to finance this activity(!), concealing cognition of the disastrous effects of regressive mutations behind this procedure going on and performing in the roles of self-appointed experts in the field of human procreation. They make major risks to social wellness through their practices and arm anti-demographic late-fire bombs. The natural human genome is inactive poorly known, due to the fact that the cognition that humanity has in the field of genetics present is inactive very insignificant, although we have calculated human genes due to the fact that they disagree in the "look", as Prof. Andrzej Kochanski says, we realize and it is not quite, the action of only 3% of the 22 1000 human genes. The functions of complex gene interactions are invisible, and the scale of genetic complexity is huge, human genotype contains 10 to the 512 power information (it is reported to be the number corresponding to the number of atoms in the universe), and how does the cognition contained in the disseminated simplifications do so . . . ? They make among the unoriented ideas of advancement and any supposedly sublime medicine.(!) In fact, this propaganda contains messages that lie about the in vitro fact leading to the hazard of genocidal mutations on an unprecedented scale, and I quote: "No population can withstand this" - about harm to only 1 RB1 gene - many times more common in procedures of breeding human embryos by ART(Prof. Cebrat)*. From myself, for now we are not able to realize on a technological level how life works, how it was created and what programs all surviving organisms serve, and what people, especially from the minute of the foreplay, through insemination, to more or little natural death.

Action to mask the fact about us. Plastic surgery, eugenic abortion and apparent in vitro enhancement of nature will not contribute to improving the quality of life and extending the duration of humanity. Abortion is freed from offspring in cases where an appropriate authority finds that any children must be killed. Under natural conditions, parents of children with disabilities have a lower chance of many offspring and statistically more frequently these inheritance lines expire; parents producing offspring, which is marked by disability, have a life much more hard than average. Their children and parents themselves should receive social support for taking peculiar care, of course eugenics propose killing specified children, but this is simply a terrible prospect. People of peculiar concern are a challenge to our humanity, science, didactics, we know it is very difficult, but killing is any kind of madness, cruel and primitive barbary, all the more so that we are able to make (to a large degree specified institutions and devoted guardians) that people with disabilities can live life in a dignified and valuable way. This does not mean that we will forget those who have the possible of multi-children. It is surely not in the social interest to punish, tax, ridicule. Natural multi-childhood usually involves affirmative parental selection, in another words good genes defend themselves and in the interests of humanity well erstwhile natural multi-childhood is simply a basic explanation of demographics and social value.

All children coming into the world, and especially those with defects are people who feel, love and surely love, they request much of this love. . . . . their lives are frequently more hard than healthy people. From an ethical point of view, those who give love to people with disabilities deserve large respect by sacrificing themselves to them, through their expertise and dedication to part of their lives, can experience various satisfactions and experience moments of happiness. I personally admire their devotional attitude and being in the shadows of the radiance of joyful celebrities of life's success. I besides admire people with disabilities who, in overcoming their disabilities, hold the joy of life, show how powerful their souls are, the power to overcome the hardships of their disabilities.

Only fact . . Unfortunately not everyone will be a marathonist, mountain climber, Sebastian Bach or Einstein, not everyone can be a parent. . . These truths request to be reconciled, those with serious genetic defects should not be encouraged to have their own children via in vitro - a breeding method unworthy of a man to this inherent problem of creating and introducing additional defects into the social cycle of the gene system, is simply a immense mistake for which future generations will pay. . .

Warsaw Caricator 2024 03 08

]]>Maciej Spry]]>

*) Stanisław Cebrat

extensive quote from discipline 1/2011 • 105-114 Science, pseudoscience and ART

(Total PDF downloadable:]]> https://journals.pan.pl/Content/91689/mainfile.pdf]]> )

. . . . was hailed the success of ART technology. Why this work was published in the Holy-

a review journal, although authors had a 1% chance to find

a case of volleyball, which occurs with a frequency of 1 in 17,000 cases?

Unfortunately for ART, the results of the Dutch have been obtained in France

of 2003 – 5 cases of volleyball and 6 cases of BWS among 110

genetic defects at 15 162 births after ART (Viot et al., 2010). Viot

She commented on the results of her squad as follows: “We estimation that in France

approximately 200,000 children were born after ART, so there were congenital defects with this

Public public wellness problem is simply a frequency. He's important.

Not only doctors, but politicians, too. Balance sheets are needed

health of children born after ART.’ Same results on MedicineNet.com

Other comments have been made: “But US experts note that this is simply a risk

(congenital defect) is not very different from that observed in the full population, and is not "fa-

That women and men treated for infertility (ART?) should be

risk information, due to the fact that couples with natural children besides ignore

the hazard of serious congenital defects.’; This phrase is frightening, though

understandably, due to the fact that who will discourage the client from buying his service?

Volleyball is straight caused by mutation in RB1 oncogen suppressor

or mutation resulting from hypermethylation of its promoter region. mistake alone

is recessive, but circumstantial effect of mutation inheritance in oncogen suppressors

causes the failure of heterozygoticity, which occurs comparatively frequently in cells

Somatic, creates appearances of dominant mutation and leads to cancer of the eye.

All 7 cases found in the Netherlands were non-families.

nom – the defect most likely occurred during the procedure itself. In 2 at-

These were shown to be mutations.

de novo. In the previously cited test results

fours after ART had 3 different mutations in the RB1 gene in their genomes, but

in this case, no demonstration of their appearance

de novo, due to the law

protecting an egg donor. Mutation finding

de novo suggests that

ART mutation rate is increased. ART besides increases frequency

genome reorganization introduced into the genetic pool (Woldringh et al., 2009).

The effects of the vast majority of these mutations are not seen due to the fact that they are recessive. These.

mutations will enter the human genetic pool and will be eliminated in future genes.

Right. All that remains is the problem of the mutation force our species can endure.

Some studies indicate that species balance in subcritical zones values

This is optimal due to the fact that it provides maximum variation (de Oli-

veira i ws., 2008). However, this mutation force cannot be importantly increased due to the fact that it may

It's killing the population. In this way, ART affects not only those who choose to

the usage of this technology, but the full human population – its future generations

**Andrzej Kochanski

Genetics in the hands of your opponent in vitro

Read more on Right.pl:
]]>https://www.prrawo.pl/health/prof-andrzej-loving-be-new-consultant-ds-genetics,495653.html]]>

quotes, respective statements by the prof. and the interview frgments:

‘ We do not know the reasons for the importantly higher incidence of any congenital malformations in children born with extracorporeal fertilization," said Prof. Kochanski in an interview, which was published on the website biotechnologia.pl "The doctor cannot be a executioner". - I'm sorry. Studies in laboratory animals indicate that genetic disorders resulting from in vitro procedures are permanent and worse inherited in subsequent generations. Finally, it has late been demonstrated that in healthy in vitro born children have subclinical cardiovascular harm that is already occurring in prenatal life. We have more and more evidence that the earliest period of human life - embryonic period determines wellness for life - he said.

Prof. Kochanski further states that he remembers from his work in a genetic clinic "hardly sick children born with the usage of in vitro fertilization".

. . . .

Prof. dr hab. Andrzej Kochanski pointed out that presently DNA investigation proves that we know about what is in 3 percent of our genetic information.

– 97 percent is simply a large mystery. It may be that these 97% – in large simplicity – regulates these 3 percent, so we are actually far from knowing the function of the human genome, although we read it a letter by letter. In 2022 the last version of this structure was presented, and it is even more accurate, and with each year the readings are getting more perfect. From reading to function, the road is far away. I think that geneticists will have something to do for respective generations," he stressed.

He added that at this phase there are issues that we truly can describe very well in the language of genetics.

– The immense advancement of oncogenetics, where fantastic things happen (...), or investigation of susceptibility to cancer. There are immense possibilities for the present genetics in cardiology – to the degree that it is called cardiogenetics. Cardiologists have excellently applied genetics and specified applications in the field of haematology, cardiology, in widely understood oncology, but there are besides many neurology and we can talk about large achievements in this field – explained tv Trwam.

The prof. has been asked questions about predicting certain traits read from our genome.

It has nothing to do with real science, medicine, biology. This is the usage of discipline as a parascience.... Let us not entrust our genes, our genetic information to people who are not professionals, due to the fact that undoubtedly the large achievements in medicine are thrown into the shadow of forecasting our fate. We can't connect it," he said.

Clinical and laboratory genetics specialist pointed out that prenatal studies carried out as part of prenatal medicine are very necessary.

– simply scope out to prenatal medicine or fetal medicine textbooks and there we see a very close connection between prenatal diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. This department of medicine is developing rather well in Poland, so prenatal investigation is surely a tool for the diagnosis of genetically conditioned diseases and in any cases – it should be noted that very seldom – there is simply a anticipation of therapeutic intervention. We would like it to go in this direction," he added.

However, as the prof. emphasized, it is definitely not going that way.

"If we look at the map of Europe at least, we will announcement that, for example, the number of children with Down syndrome in individual countries is decreasing, i.e. they are reducing the birth of children with Down syndrome. We are able to find how many children with chromosome 21 trisomy can be born due to the fact that it is not hard to find and compare these data, which are expected, we see a simplification and undoubtedly this is the consequence of selection – he emphasized.

He added that there was no very promising advancement towards prenatal diagnostics in Down syndrome.

– I gotta admit with large sadness that the current that is developing is simply a selection stream. There is simply a very uneven fight going on, due to the fact that the therapeutic trend is art and it is very hard to do. But selection, and fundamentally killing children, is not art. These are not skills that can be compared to those that people have put into working on learning gene therapy in the spinal muscle atrophy," said the professor.

***) Depopulation motivations, it is worth reading historical materials, the convergence of their content with today's fashion on these topics in Poland and not only in our country. The following is simply a planet War II historical paper on the creation of social standards aimed at depopulation, link below PDF download:

]]>https://sociocicibernetyka.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/books-oc59bwic499cimskie-2-1958-cac582oc59bc487.pdf]]>