Media window. The fact is written, but justice is inactive lacking

angora24.pl 4 weeks ago

Minister Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz announced in 2023 that public media would be cleared from the “goebbels” propaganda to the bottom, and the creators of the media strategy of contempt would be finedly punished. specified firm assurances were a hope for hundreds of opposition activists accused, insulted, sedated, that the soon-to-be arm of justice would scope the propagandists who, with regular slanders, hate, murmured on the air, led to many individual tragedies, killings and suicide (e.g. president of Gdańsk Paul Adamowicz and boy of MP Filix). Minister Sienkiewicz became a associate of the EU Parliament and went to Brussels and the issue of public media settlement remained in the country.

In April 2025, almost 2 years after waiting for the first decision towards the announced accounts, the Prime Minister set up a "Commission for the repression of civilian society in 2015-2023". The name does not explicitly indicate that public media activities are involved, but the effect of the laborious six-month work of eleven committee members, professors and doctors of various specialties leaves no illusions. The committee study published a fewer days ago is simply a compendium of cognition about public media, what they were doing, what they were doing, what the propaganda strategy of power they carried out in 2015 – 2023. The authors of the paper on 377 pages – in this respect it is an epochal work – on the basis of hundreds of hours of reviewed film, radio and press publications paper and disclose mechanisms of systemic repression applied on tv and radio to opposition activists, civilian and non-governmental organisations. The main sins of the media were: disinformation, manipulation, ridicule, stigmatization and exclusion from debate, prosecution, slander, secondary victimization and disclosure of delicate data. Honest truth.

The study is simply a very thorough description of the past media reality. However, these were not the social expectations. It was counted as reckoning, indicating and punishing the guilty. The study doesn't work. He's going to the National Prosecutor's Office. Will prosecutors find in the study conclusive evidence of offences, possibly crimes that incriminate TV, radio and PAP employees in 2015 – 2023? Unfortunately, we don't know that. If the evidence is hard, it'll take years to file charges and trial. In the 3rd part of the report, respective recommendations were addressed to various addressees, including the authorities. any are apparent to pain, for example: “A fresh model of public media is needed, based on permanent organization mechanisms that are resistant to changes in power (...); the liquidation of the National Media Council – the implementation of the Constitutional Court judgement of 13 December 2016 (...); Amendments to the National Broadcasting Board, including the definition of competence requirements for members of the National Broadcasting Board.’ Was the study needed, and is the announcement of the second one, to scope specified "discovery" conclusions?

Read Entire Article