I've been writing blog notes for 35 years. I'm a racial blogger, that's my passion. I'm most curious in polemics, and I mostly compose for that. I keep trying to follow these rules:
1⃣. I compose a well-designed, logical text with a coherent, equal rhythm, solidly argumented.
2⃣. I usage a speller, a program that improves my spelling errors, grammar, typos, punctuation and style.
3⃣. I usage commonly understood phrases, phrases and cultural codes.
4⃣. Avoids individual intruders, local details, anecdotes, dates, names, common phrases.
5⃣. I compose medium-long, substantive essays which bite powerfully into the subject.
6⃣. Before writing something, thoroughly researches the subject, read books, googling, makes solid research. And lately, I'm asking LLMy with deep thinking.
It's not always working, but I'm trying.
A fewer years ago, erstwhile there were no LLMs, I tried to run my texts through level detectors and they showed that I was writing at a university level, so I was rewriting the text to lower the level to advanced school or even junior advanced school. But it didn't work out very well, so I yet gave it up. I have no pedagogical ability.
Recently, this kind of mine has been recognized by readers as text generated by AI. It's causing the brain to block these people. They cease to be curious in content, do not dig into the subject, do not consider arguments, but the text from the place rejects: it was written by the AI, so it is nonsense, deception and confabulation. It's besides smart for them.
This approach makes people more and more stupid. Artificial intelligence, which is already many times smarter than most average people, would be a large teacher for them, but paradoxically, dealing with it causes them to reject well, wisely written and solidly justified lyrics, even written by man.
Because people don't compose like that, compose stupidly, chaoticly, with mistakes, and they can't justify their own, so if something's beyond their intellectual abilities, they'll think it's AI and they reject it.
We're sitting on the ground and we've got a chance to fly. We can do this with the aid of another people with their planes or with self-propelled machines. But we shudder at it due to the fact that it's inhuman, people don't fly.
We could decision from a horse to a car, but we're squirming due to the fact that the car is inhuman.
We could get smarter by reading wise texts, but we shudder due to the fact that people aren't that smart.
Stupid, right?
Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
