Movies and series are large tools for spreading propaganda. They can do it more or little insolently. The effectiveness of “working” people on abortion can be seen in the fact that the subtler forms give way to pushy and hardy. For example, the known productions “Dirty Dancing” and “Churds” will be used.
Gilbert Keith Chesterton claimed that if a man stopped believing in God, he would believe everything. These words seem to me the most appropriate erstwhile I hear about "reproductive rights", "safe abortion", almost to her and another specified aberrations. In fact, I feel a small embarrassed, like I'm explaining something to a wall, not to a man, erstwhile I think about the basic level of argument against abortion. specified a fast thought experimentation below will make us realize that we will come to a conflict of rights. We can announce a universal right to abortion for all woman, but its enforcement will lead to any women not being born and not actually gaining the right to abortion. They will not live to become pregnant, to sexual maturity, or even to their first menstruation, for the simple reason that they will be killed before their own birth.
SEE ALSO: Calculates propaganda
It would be naive, however, to think that people abruptly began to believe that abortion was something ordinary, morally blameless and even a woman's right. Many efforts, money and widely understood works of culture have been put into making a change of perspective. At first, arguments about the alleged necessity or the choice of lesser evil were referred to. It was not said to those who were raised or in Christian culture (whether in the US or in Europe): “Let us kill children, why not”. This had to be built up somehow, have patience and be persistent, as Stanislaw Lem wrote in “The investigation”. And no scruples.
One example of abortion was the 1987 movie "Dirty Dancing" with Jennifer Grey and Patrick Swayze in lead roles. This movie is almost classic. The action takes place in the early 1960s at a vacation hotel in the United States. A young idealist called Baby goes there with her household (the father of a doctor, parent and older sister). He succumbs to the magic of Johnny’s dancer after passages, who dances due to the fact that it is better than being a peace painter. In addition, it is besides possible to hire for the “sociality” of women whose husbands play card holidays and pretend to not see that they do not pay Johnny for the dance. On the 1 hand Baby gets to know the planet of real people, full of imperfections, on the other, Johnny tries to be better than before. The movie my sister loved, but I think it's a good production. possibly I'm little curious in dance scenes, but that movie always seemed like something. Almost 5 years ago, I wrote about any scenes from this production, so let me quote any of this text.[1] the following:
Yesterday I watched "Dirty dancing"[written 5.10.2018]. I had that line in my head, but there was something else I picked up just now. I remembered that Baby, a young idealist, had arranged for the money for the “procurement” to aid a dancer from the hotel. But I didn't remember everything. The series of events was about this: Johnny Castle's cousin (played by Patrick Swayze) tells Baby about Penny's "fall" (the aforementioned dancer). Despite suspicions, it turns out that Johnny is not the father of the child, but the waiter Robbie, who already started hitting on Baby's sister. Johnny and Penny don't have money, Robbie doesn't feel responsible, so good and helpful Baby is trying to convince him. Her argument, Robbie says anyone can be a father and give no money. Baby goes to her dad's and borrows the money she needs. Penny resists her, but that a visit to the “doctor” can only take place on the day of the show's performance, on which practically all summertime earnings of dancers depend, Under Johnny’s eye, she learns to dance to aid her friends and dance alternatively of Penny. "The treatment" is bad. As Johnny’s cousin says, the doctor had a dirty knife and a folding table. Penny's barely alive. Baby takes the doctor's father, he saves the dancer. However, he is clearly angry that he borrowed money for specified a thing.
It was only after watching the movie carefully from this angle that I realized that Baba's father's disappointment was the only critical voice about what happened. From the very beginning, the only problem is who will pay for the “procurement”.
SEE ALSO: Mr. Władysław and shame
The crucial thing is that the movie was created in 1987, and he talked about the early 1960s. Thus, around the mediate of the period between the time of the (fictitious) events from the movie and its production, Roe v. Wade (1973), which imposed the legality of abortion on all states in the United States, driving it out of the right to privacy. Apart from the curiosity of that judgement (a year ago, the ultimate Court revoked this resolution and states could freely form the laws on unborn life), it is worth noting that the "Dirty Dancing" affirms the sentence. This is not explicitly stated, of course, due to the fact that it would not be subtle, but besides illogical, due to the fact that the action occurs before its release. However, the “dirty knife and folding table” are fundamentally guilty of “confusion” with Penny’s wellness after an abortion. This is simply a subtle proposition that the 1960s is simply a time of uncontrolled, illegal and dangerous abortion. Their legalization is simply a warrant of safety. So even if individual has something against abortion, it's most likely better for women to be safe, not exposed to secret "procurement", inability to check their rights, file a complaint, etc. Typical argument from abortion supporters. In "Dirty dancing" given unintelligiblely, so the movie remains good, despite the harmful message in this case.
A man longs for specified a movie erstwhile he happens to watch something modern, where ideology is shoved down his throat so that he gets sick. In a sense, this insolence can be repellent even for indifferent people or not necessarily hostile to progressive phrases, so possibly it has its good side. Unfortunately, it besides means that the erstwhile subtle forms of propaganda have achieved their goal and can already afford anything. For example, the series “Grey’s Anatomy: Surgeons”/ “Surgeons” (I met with both titles). In the 3rd episode of the nineteenth period (the Polish premiere took place someway in April) entitled “Let's Talk About Sex” we get from the creators practically a manifesto of 1 side, called by the publicists in left-liberal simplification, on issues of sexuality, reproduction and related issues. In this episode, on which I was totally caught, students or residents (I have no idea, in any case, young doctors or almost doctors) are to teach sex education for advanced school students. In total, it has a completely applicable dimension, separated from any values. Although 1 of the teachers expressed any criticism of pornography during this class. At the end of the episode, 1 of the main characters announces that she can return to work (which she was most likely encouraged by the manager of the facility), but under her conditions, which included dealing with reproductive health. It's besides a typical newbie.
However, the strongest scene takes place earlier. A young doctor is expected to tell a 17- or 18-year-old patient that she is pregnant, which stresses him out. erstwhile she informs, the girl is scared. The doctor asks if he wants to have a baby, what he hears a firm denial. So emotional that he virtually apologized to her that he asked. He then reported that they had to do any research, and depending on their age, the embryo would propose a solution. She comes back later with an old doctor. They describe precisely how to execute a pharmacological abortion and that everything will be fine at all, but if there are any complications, then let the patient call. And here the aged doctor gives her own card with care. Here I am reasoning of the “slaughterer” of “Dirty dancing” who had a dirty knife and a folding table. Sixty years after the action of this film, abortion is legal in Washington State (a infirmary in the series "Churds" is located right there in the city of Seattle). And so much care for the patient’s wellness that she can take the incorrect drugs at home.
I want to comfort myself that just productions specified as “Shrinks” with indigestive impudence promoting abortion, are the angry cry of helplessness after the overthrow of Roe vs. Wade and that the other organization has no thought of further mass-working, so it remains for her to repeat over and over again that abortion is simply a human right that is safe and good. However, I am aware that the masses have already been mostly convinced, if not to the right of the progressives, at least that the issue is debated and everyone is surely right. 1 can only hope that honestly presenting the case, passing good arguments and logical consequences of thought and idea, we are able to convince anyone. Adversaries are patient and persistent, and now they feel so assured that they are beating their heads with propaganda. possibly it's a chance that people treated like idiots will start asking questions and looking for the fact alternatively of believing what's convenient. You should be patient and persistent too.
[1] The full text is available here: https://ghyyf7.webwave.dev/wiring-sex-boys-i-girls-5102018
