... We, People, We're fooled intheir superb game share and rule.
SOTN Editorial note: As the reader will shortly find out, reading a complete excellent trial About the fresh planet Order as shown below, there is much evidence that we have all been deceived from the very day we were born. However, over the last decade or so, many clear signals have shown that we have all been deceived by a completely false communicative of the Goods/Bads.
Especially erstwhile it comes to the false collective known as BRICS, we have all seen the 3 main powers — China, Russia, and India — uncover themselves in a way that cannot be explained, but that they are in fact staunch NWO globalists, reaching to the bone marrow. For example China were the starting point OPERATIONS COVID-19Because they have been the capital of vaccination in the planet for decades, as well as the home of the world's most oppressive social credit system. Russia leads the alleged "Special Military Operation" in Ukraine, during which millions of white Christian Slavic men killed millions of white Christian Slavic men endlessly, which is entirely in line with the agenda of the fresh planet War I depopulation. Prime Minister India Narendra Modi not only supported, but even applauded Israel during the horrific ongoing genocide in Gaza, did not offer a condolence to Iran after the brutal execution of ultimate Leader and Shiite spiritual leader, ajatollah Ali Chamenei, along with his household by an American-Israeli terrorist group (and India has long received immense amounts of overrated oil from Iran).
What's the key point?
Nobody, nobody, will come to save us. We, the Nation, We must save ourselves first, and then our countries. due to the fact that it is only erstwhile the critical mass of us here in the United States regains our individual sovereignty that it can rightly be restored. It can't be the another way around, which means it's time to face our "free land and the brave home."
State of the Nation 21
May 2026
False Wars and Higher Prices: What truly Means "Multipolar planet Order"
The planet is changing. The erstwhile dominant imperial power of the United States is weakening, hollowed out by corruption, overextended by pride, devoured by the rarities of hatred, false nationalism, and greed.
Even according to its own propaganda sources, America "became a villain," is "officially an empire in decline" And we are witnessing her "last act".
And as we await the imminent collapse of the Titan, the planet is considering the future. Everyone's talking about "multipolar planet order" just beyond the horizon.
From "Pax Americana to Pax Multipolaris".
This "Multipolar World" has long been the subject of political talks, but in fresh years it has been gaining momentum and has clearly accelerated since the beginning of Donald Trump's second term.
Russian president Vladimir Putin has been calling for this multipolar order for years and did it again Last week. Xi Jinping from China He regularly does the same thing, most late on his journey to South America in February. Kim Jong Il of North Korea reiterated these views in April.
Xi and Putin signed a joint declaration this morning about "building a multipolar world".
Two weeks ago, during a lecture at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, erstwhile German Chancellor Olaf Scholz called"a post-imperial planet [and] a resilient rule-based order in the fresh multipolar era".
In a speech on his journey to China last month, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez called for "accepting a multipolar planet order":
"What is happening present is not a transfer of hegemony, but an increase of multipolarity—in both power and prosperity,"
In addition to the speeches of politicians, the multipolar planet order has besides become the main subject of global think-tanks.
"Multipolarization" was the main subject security conference study in Munich in February 2025.
In December, Tony Blair Institute began working with JPMorgan pursuit global Council to print a study titled "World Reviled: Navigating a Multi-Speed, Multipolar Order", which ends with a preface (written by Blair and Jamie Dimona himself from JPMC):
The planet inactive offers large possible for those who are willing to engage constructively — build coalitions, invest in innovation, and aid form the principles of the next era, alternatively of just responding to them.
And then in March, the planet economical Forum published a study entitled "The Future of Material Systems: Opportunities for Multipolar Cooperation"in which he uses specified sentences...
In the multipolar world, agile business-based cooperation will be decisive in shaping resilient, productive and sustainable material systems.
It is in the conventional ellipse in which "multipolarity" is most frequently discussed. Reports for alphabetic agencies and non-profit organizations, marketplace forecasts and hazard assessment. An academic language that masks meaning with layers of excess words.
However, multipolarity is not only a favourite subject of presidents and think-tanks, but a permanent subject throughout the media landscape.
America will not escape the Multipolar Order
... said the publication of the abroad Relations Council Foreign Affairs in December.
European Times reports header "From unipolarity to multipolar reality – the fresh planet order rapidly emerges" and is much more balanced:
Multipolarity itself is neither inherently dangerous nor inherently beneficial. The eventual impact will depend on how States decide to exercise power, respect global law and cooperate in addressing common challenges.
W Politico interview entitled "What the next planet order will look like" British author Ran Dasgupta says:
If we enter a multipolar world, it's not unusual. It's the average state of the world.
As you can see, the possible collapse of our modern Rome is not frightening to many who owe their money and the position of this empire, alternatively it is stimulating or possibly "the average state of the world".
The U.S./Israel war against Iran was blamed and/or attributed for speeding up the long-awaited fall of the Empire.
Two weeks ago. The Tehran Times He wrote the headline:
How the Conflict with Iran Catalysts Multipolar planet Order
Report Middle East Council on Global Affairs depicts Iran's war as an effort to halt the multipolar planet from liberation:
What is happening in Iran is not just a war for regional power balance or atomic restraint. This is an effort to break the geographical core of the emerging multipolar order to circumvent Western domination
Carnegie Endowment for global Peace published This...
The war with Iran shows the limits of US forces – if Washington fails to adapt to the ongoing change in the multipolar world, its advantage will become a burden.
In many parts of independent media there is almost a feverish expectation.
The empire of America will fall, and in its place will be a shiny, multipolar fresh planet order, and it will surely be the Good Thing.
That's the story.
But that's all, a story.
What is the "multipolar order of the world"?
What Multipolarity truly Means
The image of a multipolar planet – without quotes – is simply a global collaboration between free and equal sovereign states, each of which pursues the interests of its nation, not surviving under the protection of imperial hegemony.
"Equal and orderly [...] inclusive, universally beneficial economical globalisation"as Xi Jinping said in speech in February.
This was repeated in more item by prof. Wang Yiwei, who wrote a briefing titled "Chinese doctrine of equal and orderly multipolar planet order", describing how different the planet would be under Chinese leadership – alternatively without leadership:
China advocates an equal and orderly multipolar planet and an inclusive economical globalisation. Among them, the core of an equal and orderly multipolar planet is to observe equality between all countries, large and small, to argue hegemonism and the politics of power, and to effectively advance the democratisation of global relations.
A little utopian look predicts a multipolar planet divided into blocks or spheres of influence, but inactive more dynamic and possibly just due to the fact that it is not in the shadow of the Empire. It was the first meaning of this phrase erstwhile it appeared under End of the 1990s.
But no of these solutions reflect the impending reality or the actual intentions of the influential ones who pass the word on to their listeners.
It could be multipolarity, but it's not "multipolarity."
It's amazing how different a couple of quotes can make, right?
Authorities that should not be and their soulless puppets in the corporate, academic and political sphere have created a completely euphemistic linguistic phraseology defined by the request for quotes.
Words and phrases that don't mean what they pretend to be.
Climate change, hatred speech, public health.
"Terrorism", "disinformation" and "sustainable development".
In our political landscape, they have ceased to be words of importance, but have become both camouflage and conditionality.
An unfair mix of programming language and hypnotic suggestion; phrases designed to obscure reality on the 1 hand and, on the another hand, mechanically induce programmed reactions or induce strong conditional emotional reactions.
Multipolarity is 1 of those words. And it should always be given in quotes.
The fact behind this word is simple: a global franchise for the old control system.
Party politics is becoming global
narrators of "multipolar planet order" frequently argue in the kind of: "is the multipolar planet no better than the imperialism of the United States? Should we not welcome opposition to hegemony?"
The same argument is utilized by climate change supporters who say: "even if the climate doesn't change, environmental protection is simply a good thing, isn't it?"
The disadvantage of this argument is the deficiency of questioning the basic assumptions and authoritative definitions of these expressions.
Just due to the fact that something takes a beautiful sounding name doesn't mean it's nice.
The labour organization doesn't support employees. Democrats hatred democracy.
State-supported corporate "ecologism" is not about planting trees or saving animals, and globally supported corporate "multipolarization" has nothing to do with expanding national sovereignty or offering independency from global power.
The reality of the "multipolar world" will be a strategy of intertwining corporate and state institutions, implementing authoritarian, anti-human policies, and masking the ideologically monolithic structure of power behind the illusional shell of the "election".
We, in the collective West, know this model very well – That's how our "democracy" works.
Two major teams, with almost identical ideologies and following orders from the same unelected authorities, fiercely fighting for the smallest part of unusualness.
They are fighting electoral battles for differences in iconography, phraseology, or fractions of percent points to divert attention from the fact that they agree on everything that is truly important, they have no real power and are at most interchangeable gadgets in a immense device of influence.
The intent of these fights is to convince people that democracy exists, that they have a choice and that they can influence change.
That's a lie. works and works from decades.
"Multipolarism" is an extension of this model – a mechanics to control the false binary policy of the left-right, red-blue, Coca-Pepsi, which is spreading worldwide.
This is precisely the same method utilized for the same purpose: tribality as a way to cognitive dissonance, ending thought and death of objectivity.
Why is that? Why now?
It is worth remembering that this falsely antagonistic version of "multipolar" was not part of the long-term plan.
It was apparent from the very beginning that the Covid pandemic was to be a large global minute unifying the world.
We were all meant to realize how foolish these misunderstandings are over ethnic, national or spiritual divisions, and to unite to defy the common enemy. A threat to the planet that solved the world, like on independency Day.
We were already to usage the digital currency as part of a globally implemented social credit system. Not having anything and being happy.
But It didn't work..
At a time erstwhile they tried to remove horizontal divisions created to control society, they only pointed to much larger vertical divisions. People abruptly became more aware of the centralised, unified nature of global power structures.
Big plan to make conduct the Global Government through the gates as part of the Trojan horse Covid, not only failed, but spectacularly turned against him.
There was a request to adjust again. A fresh approach.
International unity has not worked and not sold, but International binary The strategy could sell.
This is the "multipolar order of the world".
Real divided momentum
It's not about denying the existence of actual divisions or obscuring historical crimes. Of course, in developing countries and in the dissident circles of developed countries there are profoundly felt and completely justified anti-imperial sentiments.
The U.S. has been an imperial power for almost 2 centuries and a global hegemon for almost forty years, and at that time they have made terrible acts of colonial aggression and destroyed millions of lives. We've already discussed quite a few them.
In pursuit of oil and gold, they cut a bloody belt in the mediate East and repeatedly drove South and Central America into political chaos.
Israel similarly, whether you consider it a power behind the throne of the United States or a mockery of Washington in the mediate East, is simply a brutal apartheid state that has torn and spit out global law a 1000 times.
These are all actual facts, and multipolar communicative is applicable in them.
Just as national organization policy turns very real economical problems into shallow class injuries or understandable concerns about uncontrolled immigration into reactionary xenophobia, so the communicative of the "multipolar world" feeds on historical trauma and desire for revenge to root organization reasoning that undermines critical thinking.
Narration uses the momentum of historical hatred to push forward.
Indeed, as I have already said in interviews, the enthusiasm for this fresh model from political classes in Russia, China and others is completely understandable. From their point of view, it is much better to have a place at a globalist table than to live with Uncle Sam's atomic weapon at his temple.
It is possible that many active truly believe that the false "multipolar planet order" actually prevents atomic war and is the best solution.
Paradoxically, in their thought of "war" truly means peace.
The function of War
War is crucial for the improvement of this multipolar model in 2 main ways:
It besides has another complementary functions.
If "multipolarism" is simply a global law of false democracy, then war can be perceived as a replacement ballot box... We do not have planet elections yet; their function in the strategy is so adopted by geopolitical battles; trade agreements or staged/limited "wars".
The global unity government was and is simply a very unpopular idea, so its gradual implementation must be hidden. Nothing so well hides the unity of a goal as armed conflict.
The number of people repeating any version of the argument "how can they be on the same side erstwhile they shoot each other!", demonstrates the effectiveness of this strategy.
Nothing. Linking population As well as the perceived external threat. past is full of rulers who, in the face of discontent in the country, started a war to gain support. The state of war usually unites people around the government.
The natural extension of this known maneuver is that 2 governments agree to war to benefit from this dynamic group thinking.
This is an global geopolitical game theory, explained in book "A Beautiful Mind". They both win if they agree they won't truly compete.
Both sides have corrupt political classes, both sides have weapons producers willing to profit from chaos, both sides want "extraordinary war powers" to suppress interior unrest.
So we can see how the "war" individually benefits the rulers of each organization in the short term. More importantly, the supranational powers have a broader long-term programme (see below) which is besides being implemented by the war.
War increases prices, consumes resources, lowers surviving standards, justifies shortages and shortages of producers.
These factors combine, creating a state of being—or appearances—at a war state key to the planned decay and reconstruction of society.
This is not a fresh thought – the state has been utilizing the framework of war for centuries, or at least the threats of war, to strengthen national unity and increase the powers of the state.
The fresh twist of the action is that these "wars" are not real, are staged in 1 way or another.
All wars are a phase
We live in an age Unreal – in the treacherous inaccuracy of fresh normality – as we discussed with all these quotes.
We regularly experience "terrorism", which is not specified a thing, we organize "elections", where The vote does not matterAnd we had a planet "pandemic" without disease.
It is natural that war should be included in the propaganda control system, which is increasingly based on the specified invention of things.
Just as Western national "democracy" needs "elections" to keep the system's illusion, so "multipolar world" needs "wars" to make appearances of conflict.
These wars are not real.
Or possibly "real" is not the best word – if you want, we can say that these wars are not fair, real, noThey're honest..
Does that mean you don't drop bombs or people die?
No, as we have repeatedly said: whether in Ukraine, Gaza or Iran, there is most likely death and demolition – but that does not necessarily mean war.
As Catte says in his 2024 article:
Death is not the definition of war. Conflict is the definition of war.
Does respective raids or a 1000 killed civilians mean that the U.S. and Iran are truly enemies active in an ideological conflict for survival? Nope. Of course not.
We know these governments and agencies don't care about their own citizens, not to mention other.
People were only erstwhile once they were nailed in their homes, issued illegal DNR orders, or injected with toxic Pfizer's mascara, and equally erstwhile they were blown up.
It's like a psychotic, murderous sport. The players are real – they may play to win, or possibly paid for losing – but it doesn't substance due to the fact that the fight is controlled by a league that sets the terms.
Numbers, hours, places, rules and restrictions are fixed in advance.
And, as in sports, cheering fans hatred themselves much more than players playing – everyone gets paid regardless of who wins, and the full belongs to a fistful of billionaires who all go to the same events.
It's a more complicated question.
The simple answer is "coordination". Any coordination, especially the scale or scope, allows us to infer a certain degree of falseness. Finally, if both sides can agree to Limited War, they may agree that in They don't run it..
There are any more circumstantial symptoms worth paying attention to.
For example, both sides Calling earlierto tell themselves where they plan to bomb (or no bomb) so people can be decently evacuated.
Or 1 army reaches the enemy capital within a period and then Turns around and leaves again for unknown reasons.
Or possibly a cease-fire to carry out polio vaccination.
Or possibly unclear. or ever-changing conditions of victory.
Or pattern of raids hitting empty or doomed buildings in a consistent manner with earlier renovation plans.
Or repeated suicide or self-sabotaging behaviourwhich artificially halt advancement or prolong conflict.
Or sudden, contradictory events in narratives that They don't follow logically.
Or the apparent cooperation of the strategists supportingGlobalistic programme.
... Something like that.
This is simply a logical extension existing modus operandi. The inevitable intersection of the war model for profit that has centuries, with the era of simulacres described by Baudrillard in the 1980s.
The advantage of staged war versus actual war is very akin to what false pandemic versus actual pandemic – control.
A coordinated "war" can last as long as it needs, halt or resume on order, kill as small or as much as it needs, and can never accidentally lead to atomic destruction.
George Orwell described this almost perfectly eighty years ago. Supercontinents trapped in an eternal or possibly fictional conflict. War becomes a "pure interior cause", not a win-win, but a continuity.
Endless game and constant chaos is the way they win.
This is our state of play, complaining of wars with unclear conditions of triumph that no army always loses, but both sides constantly They say they're winning.
Meanwhile, energy prices are only rising, informing us about the fertilizer crisis, food shortages and higher taxes.
Different paths, same goal
As in national organization politics, loud or violent disputes between parties hide a joint program forced by the power that controls both sides of each apparent division.
Even erstwhile their mutually beneficial "wars" run, reports and think-tanks item the request for "limited cooperation" or "regional multilateral projects".
By hitting their soldiers together 1 end of the world, they share technology, collaborate on environmental issues or buy gas and oil from each other.
And we agree on the most crucial political documents.
The full planet (outside the US, now) signed the Treaty on the pandemic or signed to "United Nations Pact for the Future".
Kyoto Protocols, Paris climate agreements, the UN Sustainable improvement Goals are supported by all our different poles.
All of these expected parties believe the same things and advance the same fundamental globalist lies, specified as climate change or Covid.
And too the quirks of implementation or naming, everyone wants the same goals and pushes the same list of policies on the buying list:
The unspoken ending of this collective horror can easy be summed up: techno-authoritarianism.
Hrvoje Moric wrote about how multipolarization as a model is a form of global government.
A dystopian society in which a state and megacorporations merge into a horror resembling Thing, which has permanent, real-time access to all data virtually for everyone on the planet. Who has the ability and ability to monitor – or control – each transaction, each trip, all message or telephone call.
"Multipolarity" conceals this fact and uses organization reasoning and ideology to draw false or superficial distinctions.
BRICS vs. NATO, US vs. China, Israel vs. Iran, Europe vs. Russia, Belt and way Initiative vs. India- close East-Europe trade corridor.
Pick a flag and wave it. False wars and higher prices, all in the service of the large Reset.
That's its purpose, and that's what "multipolarity" means.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2026/05/21/fake-wars-higher-prices-what-a-multipolar-world-order-really-means/
