O Election redpile

Patriarchism is beneficial to women. You have concrete evidence here. In the Patriarchate, the Electoral Media Officer wouldn't gotta understand, due to the fact that that's why she'd have a husband. The husband must realize not only the jokes but besides the sophisticated artistic expressions Stanowski uses. They utilized to teach them at school. It is not about remembering linguistic theory, but about knowing irony, sarcasm, and so on. I besides usage them to sow the readers of the blog. Those who don't get it very well. Psychophans (say, psychofans!) are throwing themselves away. Returning to Mrs. Maria Korcz: in the average planet she would take care of the home and children and not compromise in front of the full Poland. She would have a husband who would gotta bear the burden of responsibility. Here is an example of a alleged stereotype that fights alleged feminists. However, it turns out to be profoundly vital and empirically justified:

]]>https://twitter.com/gazeta_choice/status/17701613399232135573]]>

Similar explanations that it was a joke, and you didn't understand, I've heard a 100 times, and they inactive don't talk to me.
Of course, I am writing about the Inba Wyborcza, who is trying to get to Stanowski, for which it is besides short, which he does not know and what he does not understand. It'll be later. In short, to make the text clear in a fewer years:

image
Wyborcza made a series of pashquila, fabricating the alleged pranks of Krzysztof Stanowski, who celebrates the triumphs on Jutupka with his Zero Channel. He laughed at Electoral attempts in his broadcast, which counted millions of views. It is crucial for us at this point that this officer Korcz truly does not understand. Stanowski wasn't even joking, he was just criticizing. He criticised Archbishop Marek Jędraszewski's statement, clearly actual and correct. But the truthfulness of this message does not mean that criticizing it is unacceptable. It's acceptable, but it's not legitimate, and that's not the point. Next, we have a low punishment for erstwhile trash footballers.

So there were no misunderstandings: the full responsibility was borne by the Electoral Office, which accepted the work, approved the texts and carried on. Dominica Wielowieyska is responsible. It is besides liable for the alleged environment and altorians, which applaud alternatively of tearing off their robes and protesting against ridicule. Where's Lempart? Why isn't he protesting at Agora?

The Electoral Editorial Office is simply a place where he has been masturbating in front of his colleagues recently. The subject of interruptions to masturbation is besides alive there. What does lemming think? » Since specified excesses happen in Wyborcza, what has to happen in Dorzeczy or the Sunday Guest? That's dialectic. However, let us deal with these events from a redpile perspective:

We have a stereotype where men talk about serious things and women talk three-by-three. Unacceptable sexism, shown in films from the 1960s. But how do you gather M Korcz, Eliza Michalik, Prostration what they can say to the wise? That's right.

image

Next: we have a problem of taking responsibility: as a man does not realize human speech this is his problem, but as a female does not realize it is simply a problem of the full planet to adapt. M Korcz admitted that she had heard many times that she did not realize jokes. And what did she do with it? This is her problem mainly, and the work of the editorial board that exploits it is on the side. Either she told her to fuck a fool, or she's just utilizing her inability. They should send her back to simple school for the right lessons. Why don't prof. Bralczyk do a broadcast on Channel Zero?

Next, we have voices that at least it's cultural. This is simply a typical women's tactic: no substance how he creates a pashquil, he commits savagery, lewdness and all vice. She wants to origin righteous anger, and if you tell her a fewer bitter words of truth, her transgressions no longer matter, crucial that he told her. And the Belarusians will gotta defend the oppressed. Entering a reputation, that is, lying is natural to her. And introducing myself as a sacrifice I wrote about it on the occasion of Gonciar, who is an example of feminist degeneration. And the another Gargamel is.

The actions of this media officer were to finish Stanowski by pouring buckets of talk on him. I mean, she's lying about him. And, of course, there are defence attorneys looking for an explanation. They found the autism spectrum. If you have this spectrum, you don't realize emotion and irony. And then the editorial board is guilty. That's m. and. Wielowieyska. Or they made her. Take it.

But here is 1 reservation and a serious remark: the author of the second pashquil is simply a man. And he does the same. Well?

image
Why are the Election Pashquils so weak? Material explanation is insufficient here: their quality is meaningless due to the fact that they are only a blackmail pad: writing meila to advertisers, sponsors with the thesis: why do you support sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ability, misogynism? If you don't stop, we'll do you by the pen in the west, etc. Electoral has been doing this for years, which he doesn't understand, or he doesn't want to understand, Galloping Major. Here, Stanowski has sponsors who have a stampede, but possible advertisers may lose. It's not like they follow displays, etc. These are political decisions. I don't want to make the subject right now, but I wrote to Major:

As for the election, she does what she always does, just like she always does. The difference is that Stanowski has no anti-regime opinion and tv Republic has. And the proscription letters of the companies advertising on tv Republic are working due to the fact that there are Tusk hatchers in the background who can run into advertisers.

To blackmail possible advertisers with meils that support homophobia and gnawing the disabled is effective, unless you have a sponsor who is ready for war. You're ignoring this aspect of the conflict.

image

To conclude:

On Sunday there is to be Ziemkiewicz at Stanowski's. The election comrades tried for the alleged risercz Ziemkiewiczowski, but how does he look against the background of the election risercz? I wonder if Wojciech Orliński, acting according to electoral methods, will get a comment?

Stanowski on Electoral:

]]>https://youtu.be/Tv6ShztZZLc?si=eOQkvZrNeXSqZ047]]>

Salon24 on the affair:

]]>https://www.salon24.pl/newsroom/1367469,stanowski-reaction-on-revelations-in...]]>

me about the G-G duet:

]]>https://www.salon24.pl/u/smoky-foams/1328523,z-life-lefty-gargamel-i-...]]>

]]>https://www.salon24.pl/u/smoky-foams/1330721%2Cafera-gargamela-sum...]]>

Major:

]]>https://galopujjajor.wordpress.com/2024/03/21/election-vs-stanowski-c...]]>