In the text on the OKE page (The Eye of the Critical Examiner) is this thesis:
“The school did not become “boring” due to the fact that teachers abruptly lost their imagination or competence. She became boring the minute advanced school ceased to be a choice and became a mandatory mask.”
Well, I went to advanced school over 50 years ago, and at that time 20% of young people (now 80%). I remember perfectly well that besides then the School was a terrible bore!!!
I wasn't bored due to the fact that I was doing homework from another lessons, doing maths in history, biology, geography. I besides played amoeba passionately and sometimes even chess. I besides talked to my colleagues and colleagues about the naval issues.
I repeat: If I didn't organize my own classes, then advanced school in the early years of the Game can be described as a “flat-oil nuuuda”.
Perhaps school present is even duller. If so, I feel sorry for the young people.
OKE's text turns a blind eye: according to this text, students who show no interest in school are liable for boredom. most likely a little, but the kind of students come to advanced school depends on education in kindergartens and simple schools, not to mention the influence of parents, social media, and the general atmosphere.
But let us not justify the Teachers from advanced school and all those liable for education in Poland. The school can be interesting!!!
I'll give you 1 example.
In advanced school physics is taught without experimenting. It is against the nature of Man!!! If I was a physics teacher, I'd give this homework:
– Put cold water in 1 bottle, hot water in the other. Put it in the freezer, or in the yard, if it's cold. Then, all 15 minutes, look and see which water will frost faster.
I'm curious myself, what would be the consequence of an experimentation in a 30-man classroom. I fishy that in 30% of cases a cold water bottle would frost faster, 30% backwards, and 40% would be a tie. If individual is curious, they can read about it on the net due to the fact that it is not a trivial problem.
Michał Leszczyński
