Bożena Ratter: A fresh European order is to be based on compulsion
date:18 August 2025 Editor: Anna
There is no uncertainty that the current ideology wants not only to decide the way and content of teaching, it besides wants to limit the rights and authorities of parents," wrote Dariusz Rohnka in 2001 about the fresh face of Bolshevikism in the "common European house". The concept that the state has the right to rise a kid has a rich tradition - French Jacobins building a utopian and bloody state, Marks and Engels recognizing the socialization of children as a prerequisite for the construction of a communist system. This tradition was taken over by Bolsheviks. The household is not an isolated common body, like the bourgeois family, it is an organic part of russian society," wrote Anton Makarenko in the russian household textbook. The "Common European Home" is the word Gorbachev from the 1992 Nobel Peace Prize ceremony (Dariusz Rohnka Fatalna fictitious 2001)
The Bolshevik tradition is continued by Minister Nowack. It builds the foundations for the creation of a russian household by transforming Polish education, i.e. the demolition of the "programming basis" (according to the postgraduate profile by the non-governmental foundation IBE) with abstract goals without the basic intent of education or KNOWLEDGE. It is about competences, that is, the perception of reality not on the basis of one's own thoughts - resulting from the acquired knowledge, tradition, religion - given in the family- but forced by the ideology of the "common European home". The amendment of the Patient Rights Act passed to the president of the Republic of Poland deprives parents of the right to defend the kid guaranteed in the Constitution, from the influence of psychiatrists, medical manipulations.
The Minister of Nowacka talks about educational policy
I regret that cognition has not been utilized to prepare us to defy a massive Bolshevik attack. Media promoted amusement with Martyniuk and the 2030 UN Agenda, alternatively of reading for example Darius Rohnk.
The aim of government social organizations is to make the right to oversee at home all young parents. This function is to be performed by a social authoritative who is “a friend, advisor and typical of his parents” and who is liable for the parents' contacts with the local administration. On the way to building a fresh kind of society, the household institution with its educational function was to be destroyed. The fresh order was to be based on coercion, and this 1 ruled out the subjectivity of man and family. (Dariusz Rohnka 2001)
This supervision and a fresh order based on coercion now wants to implement Donald Tusk.
Family is the basic place in which the process of shaping human conscience and improvement takes place, a privileged place of passing on traditions and faith. erstwhile a household fails to execute this function, children left alone and weakened become an easy mark of manipulation, are more easy influenced by the surrounding culture and content conveyed by music, provocative images, media, youth groups, circulating around ideas that are besides taught in schools, as well as social engineers programs.
Social engineer from the 19th century, Frederick Engels wrote: With the acquisition of means of production as a social property, a single household ceases to be an economical unit of society. A private household is transformed into a social industry. kid care and upbringing will become a social issue: society will look after all children equally.
She wrote and talked about the revolution in education at meetings in Warsaw in 2018. Peeters:
The global cultural revolution has made a fundamental change in the function of education (since the 1960s). Its primary nonsubjective now is no longer to get nonsubjective knowledge, but to get applicable cognition and life skills. Education now serves to assimilate by all citizens of the world, the program of the major 1990s UN conferences and postmodern standards. The citizens of the planet should learn to think and act differently - that is, unlike their own tradition. (and common sense) . Has it not been the consequence of educational improvement since the late 1960s to resolve sexual abuse among young people, school violence, personality disorder, difficulty in choosing professions and deficiency of professional satisfaction, deficiency of motivation and deep ignorance?
It is advanced time to make a serious, urgent and unavoidable assessment of the impact of education improvement and the integrity of the cognition that young people have. Finally, it is worth noting that in the field of education reform, as in the case of wellness strategy reform, the real partners of the UN are primarily non-governmental institutions (non-governmental organisations and federations of local governments)" wrote M.A. Peeters in a publication published in Poland in 2010.
No Polish (?) government has made a serious, urgent assessment so far.
Oh, my God.
