President Karol Nawrocki signed 8 laws on Thursday and vetoed two. The rejected projects afraid the Silesian language and cryptocurrency market. In his message in strong words, he stated that "The president of the Republic of Poland is not a notary of the will of the parliamentary majority". Shortly after that, the web became heated from the comments of the representatives of all options, and any of them sounded peculiarly strong.
Two presidential veto and avalanche comments
It's hard to tell which veto was more emotional. Politicians have moved the discussion to X, where they are avalanchely commenting on decisions made by Karol Nawrocki. Finance Minister Andrzej Domanski declared mercilessly: "The President's veto to the Act governing the crypto-activism marketplace is simply a clear take of political work for the losses of deceived Poles".
Government spokesperson Adam Szpiek commented in harsh words. "Another veto in the same case – a recidivism of political irresponsibility. This is the second time the president has blocked surveillance of the cryptic market. If anyone loses his savings through deficiency of regulation and control, political work falls straight on the Presidential Palace" – he thundered.
The trap received answers from the head of the Chancellery of the president of Poland, Zbigniew Bogucki. This 1 referred to the message of the political opponent, stating, "Minister, the first veto Mr president gave you a chance to correct this incorrect law, but Prime Minister Tusk was most likely angry that he would again gotta take into account the President's correct remarks and gave the order: not to go back a step; so you rejected all the amendments of the opposition and, apart from one, you rejected the amendments of your coalitionist – Poland 2050. You send the same thing twice, and you're amazed the president refuses to sign the incorrect law twice. You are responsible. However, the president is open to correcting your mistakes and is ready to work together on a good law – even from tomorrow."
Emotions besides flared up after the second veto. The president rejected the bill, which assumed to give the Silesian position of regional language. PiS MP Janusz Kowalski enthusiastically accepted this decision by writing: "I thank president Karol Nawrock for defending Polish language and vetoing the German number lobbying a harmful law on the Silesian language as a regional language. Silesian language is simply a dialect of Polish language, and Silesians are Poles. Period".
On the second pole was the Euro MP KO Łukasz Kohut, of Silesian origin. The politician started his entry with a short: "No surprises", but it was inactive only sharper. The Euro MP in an extended entry on X until he utilized Silesian vulgarism.
"He behaved like a average CI*L (worth checking in Silesian what it means)! I can't say I'm surprised. This is not the first veto against the Silesian mating bill and not the first veto in the political career of president Nawrocki. But I'm disappointed. Very! Nawrocks – you have no shame. one more time on the way to designation of our identity and LANGUAGE becomes politics" – reads a fragment of Kohut's extended entry, which besides recalled: "half a million citizens of this country GOODO POŚLASKI".
What did he veto, and what did president Charles Nawrocki sign?
Let us remind you of the 8 laws that president Karol Nawrocki signed on 12 February. The head of state has signed:
The Packaging Act,
The Property Claims Act,
The Psych Act,
The Act on Amendments to the Electoral Code,
The TSO Act,
Shareholder registry Act,
The Lost and Found Act,
The War Invalid Day Act.
Nawrocki's presidential veto justified in a peculiar statement. As the politician emphasized, speaking about the Silesian language bill, "he respects and appreciates the tradition and culture of Silesia very much". At the same time, he informed that the task had been rejected after consulting experts.
– Experts and linguists indicate that the Silesian language is simply a dialect of Polish. We cannot make a precedent in which a political majority settles technological issues. The Act was besides underdeveloped financially and administratively, it passed on tasks to local governments without adequate funding," he stressed.
The second veto bill afraid the cryptocurrency market. The president rejected the task again. As he claimed: – 1 item has been changed, fundamental errors have not been removed. I will not sign the incorrect law just due to the fact that it was re-voted by the parliamentary majority – the incorrect law passed even a 100 times inactive remains the incorrect law.
