Nawrocks must go

Moody’s rating agency decided to reduce Poland’s long-term rating by 1 step — from A2 to A3 — and at the same time changed its position from negative to stable. As the main causes of the analysts, there are persistent advanced deficits, increases in debt and its handling costs, and weaknesses in government budgetary policy effectiveness.

So far, this decision has not resulted in more perturbation, as another credit rating agencies have already lowered our ratings.

However, the current transmission must be cited; "Tuska Wine".

Then why do I think Nawrocki should be dismissed?

due to the fact that our president reminds me of Chief Joseph Piłsudski. It was his resignation before the 1920 Warszawski conflict that caused Bolsheviks to break down and Poland won. Unfortunately, the confusion with Piłsudski did not know how to usage it and the peace treaty in Riga, as if she had lost to the Russians. The president feels the same way. He claims that even if Poland gave up its territory, it would save the soul. He said this on September 17, in Włodawa, on the 87th anniversary of the escape of chief chief Edward Rydz Śmigły.

Our president dreams of dictatorship – but which one? Hitler's Nationalism, Stalin's Communism, Tramp's Capitalism, Or Putin terrorism.

It is these “dreams” that affect how the planet evaluates us. But we have something to say. Especially since the ultimate Court did not approve the election of Karol Nawrocki as president of the Polish State... If, hypothetically, alternatively of Nawrocki put Trzaskowski, the talker of the Sejm Simon Holovnia would not have sworn to Trzaskowski. He would be afraid of the same thing as if Nawrocki were not sworn in – social discontent.

Therefore, the departure of Karol Nawrocki must be combined with the restoration of the election of the president of the Polish State by a secret vote of the National Assembly – as in the March Constitution of 1921. Finally, Jaruzelski's 1990 mistake must be corrected. He changed the way the president was elected from parliamentary to universal so that we would elect Lech Walesa. Parliamentarians of Wałęsa would not choose and Jaruzelski was afraid that Poles would protest. He felt that Lech Wałęsa as not president of Poland would harm Poland more. I don't know – although with Alexander Kwasniewski we succeeded – but then – with each of our choices it looked worse. It's scary to think what would happen if the Polish society of the next president chose.