If we accept the reasonable and widely accepted thesis that the driving force of past is large ideas, then it should be agreed that in an crucial sense the "end of history" was right. More specifically, while they were evidently incorrect in their predictions of eternal peace under the aegis of global right-human social liberalism, it is not hard to agree that this right-human social liberalism effectively struck a fatal blow to the perfect fertility of man.
Well, while from the beginning of the era of dominance of this ideology (i.e. from the beginning of the post-war period) certain ideas have yet faded and have gone distant (e.g. Leninist or Maoist communism), at the same time absolutely no fresh ideas were created that could compete for the global government of souls. Thus, while the end of the Cold War did not prove to be a definite end of smaller or larger conflicts of all authorhood, all these conflicts are going on at the ideological level only between increasingly immediate and indigestively reheated ideological surviving bodies (neomalsianism, neo-marksism, neo-feudism, neo-imperialism, neo-nationalism, etc.).
To sum up, while past is inactive alive in the chronicle sense, there is no way to defy the impression that for at least a fewer good decades it has been dead in the ideological sense, and thus besides cultural and cultural, and that the dead 1 seems to be increasingly felt with the outbreak of any subsequent conflict of fuchuyamists (in principle: "they are fighting again, though they were no longer to fight, but – although they are dying, killing, destroying and plotting against each other, it does not ignite anyone's imagination or giving birth to any vision).
Whether it is an eschatological signal or only a profoundly stagnant 1 – everyone has to answer this question himself. However, no substance what answer you want to give here, it is not possible to escape in formulating it from certain fundamentally "fukuyam" constatations – suggesting not the triumphalistic fulfillment of certain processes, but their final exhaustion.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
