Narration
Everything changes – nothing is permanent.
Movies from the 1970s are hard to confuse with films from the 2000s.
It's most likely a substance of fashion, trends.
Topics discussed, dilemmas change over the years and there are different reactions to e.g. animal rights protection.
Even literature and poetry, which seems to be the most universal, is besides subject to cultural evolution.
So what's truly universal? Is everything a fresh communicative located in the next decade?
Could people born a 100 years earlier usually talk to modern people?
We disagree from our ancestors diametrically – in speech, customs, impulses, all areas of dignity and honor and even culinaryly.
So are we someway like our ancestors, or is there a region of interpersonal relations that does not change and is an intergenerational link?
It is and is rather an crucial part of our life.
This is, for example, a conversation in a man's group where the gentlemen exchange information, policy and attitude to be adopted at a given time.
From the accounts that came to me from the war, that's how we communicate in the pandemic.
That's what we said in the state of war.
And this isn't about ideas or fighting, no, here we have a historical, pragmatic conversation between men.
Nothing changes here.
The same is true, and possibly even to a greater extent,- women's discussions on the basic issues of the family: upbringing, childbirth, home-taking or household health.
In these spheres nothing has changed in centuries – the same communicative ...
Which is--
Let's be applicable and we'll be universal.
I greet those who read to the end.
