The top Rape of Truth

The most audacious troublemaker does not declare an open revolution under the slogan "beyond tradition", but carries out a creeping revolution under the banner of "continence with tradition": yielding to ideological veganism has the nerve to mention to the eternal practices of spiritual posts, the neo-Marxist agenda of "diversity and Inclusion" has the nerve to identify with classically understood virtues of tolerance or hospitality, the downtrodden "cashless economy" has the nerve to compare with the bottom-up, spontaneous process of transition from barter to gold money, etc.

In another words, utilizing the almost complete rooting of its victims from the dirt of timeless values and their almost complete ignorance in terms of the past of ideas, subversive novelism tunes it unceremoniously into a costume of modern renewal of ancient customs, putting the frog to sleep on a slow fire with a constant trajkot that "nothing large is happening" and "it was all already." So it is not essential to add that the only way to avoid being put to sleep by a akin trajkot and not to be cooked is to become acquainted with the solid past of ideas and to have permanent roots in the dirt of timeless values: this is the only act that must be done present at a revolutionary pace, so as not to be subjected to revolutionaries simulating action at a conservative rate.

* * Oh, * *

The final phase of intellectual conviction is erstwhile people hear around them not triumphant perors about “classless societies”, “thousand-year-old crowds” or “water eras”, but instilling chatter about “transdisciplinary dialogues”, “contextary paradigm changes” and “critical awareness of the experiences experienced”. In the first case, we deal with preparations of depraved but inactive functioning minds, which should be given firm logical resistance. In the second case, however, there is simply a fermenting intellectual pulp, which should be cleared from all space in which there is any enforcement, organizational or reputational influence.

In another words, where fundamentally the anticipation of rolling firm logical polemics (that we do not mention a classically dialectical joint enquiry into truth) is simply a necessity on the 1 hand to repeat the eternal obviousness, and on the another hand the deafening of the gibberish, which tries to dissolve awareness of these obviousness by force of corrosive inertia. It should not be surprising, however, that where the honest investigation of fact becomes a phenomenon not so much absent as the programmaticly incomprehensible, only the axiom, or exponent of fact requiring no investigation, and silence, or exponent of unfathomable truth, is to stay in the square. In conclusion, there is only “yes” and “no” – spoken erstwhile it is essential to speak, and silenced erstwhile it is impossible to speak. The remainder is noise.

* * Oh, * *

The top rape of fact is not to claim that fact does not exist, but to claim that there are infinitely many truths; not to claim that fact cannot be discovered in any aspect, but to claim that fact can be discovered indefinitely in all aspect; and not to claim that there are useful lies, but to claim that there is no essential clarity. In another words, the top rape against fact is not the deliberate deception of intellectual errors, from which 1 can always return, but the deliberate urge to intellectual suicide, which, erstwhile made, permanently takes the consciousness that 1 has gone astray.

* * Oh, * *

The expanding influence on the markets by central banks shows how well communism is doing today; the more audacious pushing of the agenda of the alleged green fresh order shows how well eugenics are today; the more extended attempts to punish the alleged hatred speech show how good orwellism is today; and the more aggravating of the "cashless economy" and "common digital identities" shows how well technocracy is today.

In another words, the 20th-century spirit of the full revolution has not only not been effectively exorcised from the world, but it is, in fact, striving increasingly insolently to collide with the logical order of reality. So there has never been a better time to become a fearless counter-revolutionist – and in all essential area of life, both individual and collective – especially since it is already a manifestation of no political conflict or ideological identity, only simple intellectual, moral and spiritual self-defense.

* * Oh, * *

The dangerous deceiver praises unconditional cruelty, wanting to confuse in his victims the knowing of good and evil, but the most dangerous deceiver praises unconditional mercy, wanting to dissolve in his victims the knowing of good and evil. The erstwhile thus encourages us to be evil, which does not take distant his victims' chance to atone for their sins, while the second encourages us to get free of the cognition that we can be evil, which guarantees his victims to follow their wines into an unreturned abyss.

* * Oh, * *

The unity of truth, goodness, and beauty is that all expected good and beautiful lie is the highest slobbery and cabotin illusion, all supposedly intelligent and sophisticated evil is the most perverse and ephecy parasitism, and all allegedly revealing and touching ugliness is the most trivial and infantile tandem. In another words, correctness, work and propriety are 3 very crucial terms of 1 basic content.

Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski