Middle picture: this is simply a protest of the Spring Movement of young Russians who called for a nationwide Russian protest against the mobilization announced by president W.Putin. –https://business.interia.pl/economy/news-Russian-youth-refers-to-protests-and-exit-on-street-m,nId,6299283– The interesting thing is that in Russia and the West Putin's image was stylized on A.Hitler (?).
The selection of the photos is not accidental, due to the fact that all chance is good to kick Russia, embarrass Russia, and discourage her sympathies – it seems that this is the motto of my noble interlocutor – neon reformer – in its text “If COVID didn't exist, why is Russia inactive developing vaccines?“ —https://neon24.net/wgvz6x1r,skoro-covid-no-existal-to-po-co-Russia-still developing-vaccines#comment_qp794jdq
__________________
Genon:You wrote a long comment on whether the virus is simply a surviving organism, while my article is about that Official Russia considers COVID-19 a real diseaseAnd any pro-Russian commentators claim the exact opposite. You did not respond to this contradiction in 1 sentence.
Republic of: I see Russia is rather a problem for Kolega. Fortunately, obsessions can be treated, although only 25% of patients accomplish complete healing – but I urge it, it is worth a try, possibly it will work, who knows (?):https://www.medonet.pl/health/obsession-symptoms-cause-treatment-procuration/jx4bhtj
I'll effort to aid my colleague temporarily, possibly without therapy.
The planet Bank in February 2020 predicted that COVID-19 would proceed until the end of March 2025. Oh, my God! Picpandemia was planned for 5 years, until March 2025 – forhttps://principia-scientific.com/proof-that-the-pandemic-was-planned-with-purpose/
As you most likely know, the Russian State has been a associate of the planet Bank (WB) since 1992. Membership of the WB imposes different obligations and obligations on associate States in implementing "common" projects – failing to comply with them entails financial consequences. Is something already starting to brighten up with Covid and Russia ?
It is besides worth to think in a free minute about the fact that picpandemia covid ended precisely erstwhile the West started war with Russia in Ukraine (?).
Genon:Didn't I tell you? That talking to a friend is like...
—
Dear fellow,
Thank you for taking care of my intellectual health. You can see that Russia is not just an obsession for Kolega, but a real Platonic love – although, sadly, unrequited.
It is only a pity that, in this colourful argument about the planet Bank planning a picpandemic precisely until March 2025, about Russia's membership in BŚ since 1992 and about how "it all ended precisely erstwhile the war began"... Not a single conviction has he referred to the point.
And the point is simple: authoritative Russia – Government, Ministry of Health, Rosstat, Putin personally – at all times she treated COVID-19 as a real disease. She introduced covid passports, lock-down, mass vaccinations of Sputnik and kept statistics. At the same time, a large part of the pro-Russian (why I do not personally deny) “independent thinkers” in Poland shouted that it was “plandemia”, “flu”, “water tests” and the global game of Bill Gates, Soros, etc.
This is the small contradiction I was asking about. A friend responded with a link to the treatment of obsession. A masterpiece of intellectual integrity. possibly next time, alternatively of linking the Medonet, he will compose to his friend directly: “I'm not curious in facts due to the fact that they spoil my beautiful narrative.”?
I greet you warmly and want you successful cognitive-behavioral therapy. As part of home exercises it is sometimes worth checking what Russian state tv truly said between 2020 and 2020.
Republic of: And has your friend thought: why “picpandemia covid ended precisely erstwhile the West started war with Russia in Ukraine” – ?
Reflection of this fact, and especially its conclusions, may be of interest to the Reader (or possibly besides to his friend) more than epatating Go anti-Russian phobias of the Colleague who can bring nothing meaningful to the political discourse.
Genon:So let's talk about the Pearl Wheel:
"picpandemia covid ended precisely at the start of the West war with Russia in Ukraine".
That's 1 of the funniest sentences I've always read in that thread, suggesting irritation.
The colleague first suggests that the global “plandemia” It was so precisely controlled that the West with 1 click shut it off in February 2022Because he abruptly needed a war? And all of this with the simultaneous membership (as a shareholder) of Russia in the planet Bank, which supposedly organized this plot?
Let's think – unless. A colleague claims that – manager Putin participates in what he does not understand, then consent. It's not even a conspiracy explanation anymore, it's a geopolitical fantasy.
A alternatively of admitting that this communicative is embarrassingly illogical, he is trying to teach me to "think my conclusions." I've been thinking. The conclusion is simple: any pro-Russian narratives are so disconnected from reality that they regret to look.
And no, it's not about WHO dates. It's about intellectual integrity... or a complete deficiency of it.
My friend most likely won't choke with a word, but since he had specified a "principia-scientific"Then why was precisely what happened in Russia? possibly he forgot to send Putin? possibly he didn't know? possibly he was a criminal. If... "principia".
—
And since we are already in the setting of "our own" because... "principia", then in fact – we should be seizing our own. due to the fact that there was quite a few intellectual circus on both sides. I just don't know if a friend of mine is going to do his own circus on the barricades.
Republic of:He wrote a friend:
"Official Russia – Government, Ministry of Health, Rosstat, Putin personally – at all times she treated COVID-19 as a real disease. She introduced covid passports, lock-down, mass vaccinations of Sputnik and kept statistics.’
This is all true, but can a colleague identify a associate state of the planet Bank (out of 189 specified countries) who acted differently from Russia?
The pandemic policy has fundamentally been rejected by 2 states: Belarus, Nicaragua.
Therefore, Dear fellow Members should halt giving vents to their anti-Russian obsession, due to the fact that the publicist effect is most likely the other of the intended one, and it does not look besides serious either.
Genon: Dear fellow,
It's good that he yet gave me a friend's right: authoritative Russia (government, Putin, Rosstat, Ministry of Health) treated COVID-19 as a real illness and applied a standard pandemic policy.
Now, let's get to the point, 'cause my friend's missing them skillfully again.
The question was not: "Did Russia behave like another planet Bank associate States?". The question was, why? Pro-Russian commentators in Poland They hung dogs for all this – “plandemia”, “water tests”, “vaccinations for infertility”, “global conspiracy” – while their beloved Putin, Lavrow and Russian state tv were doing precisely the same thing as “this criminal West”?
That's the contradiction I'm talking about. Not that Russia followed general trends (because it applied), but that its devotees sold completely different stories.
As for the planet Bank and "all countries have done the same" - I congratulate the discovery (the colleague has tried besides hard) that most of the world's governments have reacted similarly. However, this does not explain in any way (here Kolegi the intellectual effort, as if it were a sham), why part of the pro-Russian net in Poland for 2 years complained about reality, scrupulously bypassing the fact that authoritative Russia followed the recommendations of the same institution, which he supposedly hates so much.
Finally, delight do not confuse the Russian contradiction with the “anti-Russian obsession”. Rather, he is obsessed with translating everything into “everybody did so, so Russia is great.”
Republic of:In consequence to commentsstate59wrote a colleague:
‘My article is that Official Russia considers COVID-19 a real disease”
That's what I said. fat a message as to the main thought of Kolega. However, an intelligent Internaut would conclude that this is an indirect consequence to the question of why, as I see it, "Pro-Russian Commentators“ They wrote what they wrote.
What I don't realize is what the Colleague said would consequence in the pro-rossiness of these commentators, or the fact that they were negating picpandemia. ?
It will be hard for the Colleagues to show their pro-Russianity on the basis of the fact that the Russian authorities followed the WTO task and recommendations (funded mainly by US-owned owners) on the issue of covid, which "Pro-Russian Commentators“ they denied. Looks like a friend of mine has been smitten in his anti-Russian obsessions.
The fact that the Russian authorities followed the WTO task and the WHO recommendations does not mean that they did not know what they were dealing with:
March 2021, Lavrow's visit to China
‘FCKNG QRNTN’ – literally: ‘pi***clarification’ –https://www.reuters.com/world/china/russias-top-diplomat-dons-anti-lockdown-mask-bearing-profane-slogan-2021-03-22/
Since a colleague considers himself intellectually honest, I hope he can learn from the above that both the Russian authorities and “Pro-Russian Commentators“ they had a akin attitude toward the picpandemic covid and its designers.
But so that Kolega does not get besides frightened by specified a self-exposed conclusion (if it comes to that of course – ?), I propose to find in the home pharmacy any calming specific, neurosol, possibly bromine.
Genon:He writes a friend:
"The fact that the Russian authorities followed the WTO task and recommendations does not mean that they did not know what they were dealing with."
It's a alternatively peculiar thesis.. It follows that the Russian authorities knew that they were carrying out a harmful project, yet they consistently implemented it for 2 years.
I'll say more: according to this logic, "any blogger" knew that it was a "picpandemic" and that a country with an interview, a safety camera and a immense analytical facility for 2 years had obediently implemented this task because... didn't know?
According to this logic, the Russian authorities, like the erstwhile USSR, seem to be constantly "knowing better", but inactive do precisely what others dictate to them. This is hard to reconcile with the image of a sovereign and strong state.
And the most amazing thing is that a colleague can simultaneously present specified a country as a model of independence. Especially since they're beating up another countries for missing it.
So I'm not amazed by the power of arguments... alternatively of... showing up in Kolega's brom, neurosol, and another tranquilizers. erstwhile there is no logic, in fact there is only pharmacology. However, there is no survey to confirm that after taking the tablet, logical reasoning is back on track.
‘"The fact that the Russian authorities followed the WTO task and recommendations does not mean that they did not know what they were dealing with."
It's a alternatively peculiar thesis.. It follows that the Russian authorities knew that they were carrying out a harmful task and inactive implemented it consistently for 2 years.”
Perhaps if a colleague had not given himself entirely to his anti-Russian phobia and allowed himself a small logical reasoning and more careful reflection of the planet of politics and more careful reading of polemic comments, he would have noticed that The Russian authorities acted on the issue of picpandemia as did the another BI associate States subject to its dictatorship - What I wrote about.
I besides wrote that Guilty of his colleague to reconsider the abrupt interruption of picpandemia in February 2022, caused by the beginning of the West-provoked war with Russia in Ukraine.
‘And the most amazing thing is that a colleague can simultaneously present specified a country as a model of independence.‘
I realize that the deficiency of arguments makes up for it by attacking a fellow without considering the means utilized to defend this defense. However, I uncertainty that impotent me with statements that my colleague is incapable to prove will prove that he has the advantage of Colleagues in these conversants.
Genon:Buddy, possibly if my friend hadn't looked into all message of phobia, we would have exchanged meaningful remarks.
And... alternatively of answering the question directly:
Why would a sovereign, great, and supposedly independent country fund citizens all the time for picpandemic?
... we're having a pick-up.
Republic of:And another picture:
May 2021, A.Blinken Secretary of State USA & S.Lawrow
Genon:We're getting to the bottom of this. The facts are simple:
Russia considered COVID-19 a real disease. She introduced lockdown, work masks, covid passports, mass vaccinations of Sputnik, enforced any sharpening and kept authoritative statistics.
This is not my opinion, but a description of the actions of the Russian state.
If he claims that the position of the Russian authorities and those commentators was the same, delight indicate erstwhile the Russian government rejected its own lockdown, covid passports or vaccination program. Not mem, not the writing on the minister's mask, but the circumstantial decision of the authorities.
Unless, of course, he thinks that the Russian authorities were conducting politics under individual else's dictatorship. But then we are no longer talking about sovereign state policy.
If so, the question remains: why idealize a state that – According to Kolega's own thesis – obeying the instructions of the same forces as the main enemy? But you can sigh, even to a whorehouse... if you fall in love with specified an unreasonable one. However, there are 2 whores, the east and western ones, but both have the same sutener. So why should the taste of a friend be more appropriate than the taste of individual else? Since this platonic love is charged by the same pimp.
“Unless a colleague thinks that the Russian authorities have conducted politics under individual else’s dictatorship. But then we are no longer talking about sovereign state policy.
If so, the question remains: why idealize a state that – According to Kolega's own thesis – Obediently obeying the instructions of the same forces as the main enemy?”
My comments/answers afraid 2 circumstantial facts related to the picpandemic covid. I did not compose in comments about the sovereignty of states or their lack.
I announcement that he is starting to talk to his colleague by accepting as the guiding thought an anti-Russian obsession – unfortunately, most likely incurable.
Genon: ‘...I did not compose in comments about the sovereignty of the states or their absence ...”
—
That's right, my colleague didn't write, due to the fact that he can't honestly admit that there's no country in Russia.
Republic of:Sovereignty – its scope or deficiency of it – is an extended subject and cannot be closed in the evaluation 0 (no) and 1 (is).
On the another hand, a colleague, whether as a consequence of an anti-Russian obsession or an anti-Russian duty, seeks to adopt his position, which is neither nonsubjective nor honest.
There is no uncertainty that Russia as the USSR until 1990 was a sovereign state. Russia (FR) no longer has specified a scope of sovereignty after 1990.
However, can it be argued that the degree of the sovereignty of modern Russia (FR) is comparable to the degree of sovereignty, e.g. IIIRP/Polin, or another Western states ? If there was an identity here (the identical ranges of sovereignty), then the West would not wage a war with Russia, which does not agree to limit its sovereignty.
In general, 1 thing can be said that a state whose government has no constitutional (or otherwise recorded) powers to conduct their own monetary policy (it is not owned, for example, by Western states) He's not a sovereign state. Hence, in 2006 the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India and China) initiative appeared, which reject the dictatorship of financial institutions owned by the US and its dominance, which implies wars waged by the US and Western states, including the war on Russia.
Genon:The fobies – whether anti-Christian, anti-Russian or any another – are not an argument in discussions about the sovereignty of states. They are, at most, the weakness of the man who displays them.
If individual accuses another of anti-Russian obsessions, and he regularly shows an aversion to Christianity (or vice versa), then he plays the same game: alternatively of facts and logic they substitute emotions and worldly resentment. It doesn't rise the level of debate, it poisons it.
Rather than assigning yourself to others, it is worth looking at and asking yourself for your own interests.
Republic of:Well, what about sovereigntyThe 1 my friend was so persistently instigating? Does he no longer stand for the College of Invention to further combinations in this regard?
Anti-Christian phobia (Christianophobia) – this word is utilized by spiritual fanatics, obsessives, frightened of the logical view not only of the absurdity of this religion, or religion in general as such, but besides of its political perniciousness, as well as of the publicizing of its criminal past (and besides of its modernity) or of the usage of this word by individuals who are fundamentally dishonest, who usage Christianity to accomplish their political purposes. I don't ask which 1 of these groups of friends includes himself.
Therefore, if a colleague is willing to face any charges against my views, it is worth considering them thoroughly first, due to the fact that he disavows his fellow unwittingly.
___________________
Dariusz Kosiur
