MRNA vaccines and cancers

Recently in the magazine Biomarker Research an crucial survey has been published entitled:

Annual hazard of cancer associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large cohort survey conducted on populations in South Korea

The survey was indeed large as it included more than 8,400,000 people. The fact that it is carried out in South Korea does not burden its credibility with European or American political games. This may have prevented his publication in the mainstream medical journal, as in the case of respective erstwhile studies from another countries.

Based on a statistical analysis of the medical records collected, the hazard of circumstantial types of cancer, Hazard Ratio — HR, was identified. In the non-vaccinated group, the baseline value of HR=1 was compared to that of the vaccinated. Therefore, if specified HR is greater than unity for vaccinated, this means an increased hazard of post-vaccination.

Indeed, the hazard ratios of thyroid cancer by 35%, tummy by 33.5%, colon by 28%, lungs by 53%, breasts by 20% and prostate by 69% increased 1 year after vaccination.

Risk increases of 30-70% may be worrying, especially since the results only concern the first year after vaccination and it is unknown what will happen after a long time. On the another hand, it is now known that the production of spike protein by the body can last much longer than a year, especially after repeated vaccinations.

Interestingly, the news of the survey was provided by the regular message newspaper, of course trying to make it very little important, calling it a controversial survey and adding chatter from experts about how this statistical correlation does not mean a causal relationship. Eventually, the cancer - stricken ones could have been massively vaccinated or only cigaret smokers were vaccinated.

Incidentally, the presently unquestionable harmfulness of smoking has been demonstrated in a akin way years ago.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-15145025/Experts-contentious-study-Covid-vaccine-risk-SIX-cancers.html

There are 2 questions here. First, why do our media not study the results of this study? Surely, if he hadn't shown a connection, we would have heard of him for weeks from all media outlet.

Secondly, what prevents a akin survey from being conducted in all countries with a public wellness care that is sufficiently developed to let for adequate patient records. besides in Poland. There is no request to employment besides many qualified doctors. Just direct from a bloated wellness administration respective officials with the ability to navigate through patient databases and know complex illness coding systems. The remainder of the work belongs to statistic and computers.

If the wellness authorities were truly convinced that the vaccines they had forced were safe, would they not carry out specified studies without exhortation? In this way, they could easy silence all the disgusting anti-vaccinationists by presenting studies showing a deficiency of grounds for concern. It is not heard about specified an initiative from another wellness minister or GIS Paweł Pfizer-Grzesiowski.

One more crucial question remains about the existence of a ‘hot’ batch of vaccines, which has not been studied in the presented work. The causes of specified lots may vary, most frequently due to insufficient cleaning of biological material utilized during production or additional external contamination.

The way of the companies to blur the problem was to randomly send questionable batches of vaccines around the planet so that there was no regional cluster of victims and it was much harder to delegate problems to a peculiar batch.

It seems that fewer specified hot parties went to Poland compared to another countries, but 1 can inactive hear about the cases of turbocars among celebrities. However, they may have been vaccinated abroad, where everything is better.

The full work can be found at the link below, and here I only post its summary

https://biomarkerres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40364-025-00831-w

Summary

Hypothetically, the oncogenic possible of SARS-CoV-2 was postulated, but actual data on COVID-19 infection and vaccination are insufficient. Therefore, the nonsubjective of this extended population retrospective survey in Seoul, South Korea was to estimation the cumulative incidence and subsequent hazard of malignancies in full 1 year after COVID-19 vaccination. Data on 8 407 849 people from 2021 to 1923 were obtained from the database of the Korean National wellness Insurance. The participants were divided into 2 groups based on vaccination position against COVID-19. The overall hazard of cancer was assessed utilizing multi-factorial models of Cox proportional risk, and data were expressed as hazard quotient (HR) and 95% assurance intervals (CI). hazard factors for thyroid cancer (HR, 1,351; 95% CI, 1,206–1,514), gastric (HR, 1,335; 95% CI, 1,130–1,576), colon (HR, 1,283; 95% CI, 1,122–1,468), lungs (HR, 1,533; 95% CI, 1,254–1,874), breasts (HR, 1,197; 95% CI, 1,069–1,340) and prostate (HR, 1,687; 95% CI, 1,348–111) importantly increased 1 year after vaccination. In terms of the kind of vaccine, cDNA has been associated with an increased hazard of thyroid, gastric, colon, lung and prostate cancer; MRNA vaccines have been associated with an increased hazard of thyroid, colon, lung and breast cancer, while heterologous vaccines have been associated with an increased hazard of thyroid and breast cancer. Given the observed relation between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer morbidity depending on age, sex and kind of vaccine, further studies are needed to find whether circumstantial vaccination strategies can be optimal for the population requiring COVID-19 vaccination.

Relative post-vaccination hazard and mistake ranges for various cancers. In red, those whose growth is statistically crucial were identified. At the top of the overall score, a cumulative increase in cancer hazard of about 25%