Modified HiT manual. Czarnek promises to remove 1 controversial fragment

Zdjęcie: Przemysław Czarnek komentuje kontrowersyjny fragment podręcznika. Fot. Lukasz Gdak, Pawel Wodzynski/East News


The HiT manual is causing quite a few controversy. Recently, the fragment in which the author writes about "breeding children" is the most commented on. From the context, it can be inferred that these are children conceived by in vitro fertilization. Przemysław Czarnek admitted that this fragment should be removed. The fragment about "breeding children" in the past and present textbook caused a storm According to unofficial reports, however, it will be removed from the book or completely changed Przemysław Czarnek defends the textbook, but agrees that this peculiar fragment should be reworded The scandalous fragment of the HiT textbook has vanish From September, a fresh subject is to be introduced to secondary schools - past and the present (HiT). The textbook for this subject was written by prof. Wojciech Roszkowski, a well-known historian and erstwhile PiS MEP. Written in haste, the book received many negative reviews. Recently, public opinion has been red-hot with a fragment about "breeding children", from the context of which it can be concluded that it is about children conceived by in vitro fertilization. Wojciech Roszkowski writes: Czarnek: "Words taken out of context" On Thursday, on Polsat News, Przemysław Czarnek referred to the controversial part. He stated that in the HiT manual "there is no word" about the in vitro method. - I heard from Donald Tusk that Czarnek allegedly wrote a fragment about in vitro, which are to be unloved. An incredible scandal, said the minister. However, he found that due to the controversy that had arisen, it was worth redacting the manual. “I believe that due to the fact that it has been skewed to specified an extent, this fragment could vanish to defend children conceived in vitro. There's not a word about that in the manual, but twisting what's written there weeks after the book is on the market, taking it out of context and inserting words that aren't there is what the PO is celebrated for and Donald Tusk - he explained. Finally, he added that Donald Tusk "used in a vile, nonsubjective and instrumental way children conceived by in vitro fertilization". An eloquent comment by Barbara Nowacka Onet informed that the controversial fragment was to be removed. The informant informed the portal that the Biały Kruk publishing house, which is liable for the book, "does not agree with the explanation of the fragment that appears in the media". The case was eloquently commented on by Barbara Nowacka. An MP from the Civic Coalition said that it was "a waste from start to finish". "First, they spent the money, allowed and promoted this crap, and now, after reading the piece, they announce that it will disappear. That is, the regrind and print a fresh one," she wrote on Twitter.