Paweł Mościcki
Writer and philosopher, works at the Institute of Literary investigation of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw. associate of the editor of the quarterly "Viewed Theories and Visual Culture Practice". Book author: The Politics of Theatre. Essays on engaging art (2008), Godard. Passengers (2010), thought of Potential. The anticipation of doctrine according to Giorgio Agamben (2013), We already have a past. Guy Debord and past as a battlefield (2015), Photo-Constellations. Around Mark Piasecki (2016), snapshots from oppressed traditions (2017), Chaplin. Predicting the Present (2017), Football Lessons (2019), Asylum (2022) Higher up-to-date. Studies on Dante's Modernity (2022). He is besides the author of the blog: Pawelmościcki.net.
Rafał Górski, editor-in-chief of the Obywatski Week, talks to Paweł Mościcki, a author and philosopher.
So let's do this: let's perceive to each another alternatively of barking and lashing out at enemy camps. Let us halt comparing Slobodan Miloshević with Hitler. Let's halt seeing him and his wife Mira Markovic Macbeth and his woman or the parallels between this couple and the dictator of Ceausescu and his wife Elena. And let us no longer usage the name "concentration camps" for camps formed during the civilian War in Yugoslavia.
Peter Handke (nobel prize laureate), “Test of answers”
If there were no protocols and educational arrangements of Finnish, Belarusian and Yugoslav doctors, these 3 incriminating witnesses would have managed to get out of their lies. In fact, the prosecution had to recognise these production arrangements. alternatively consciously, it accepted these false statements and utilized them in evidence. So what's this all about? seemingly a desperate effort to prove in the courtroom the massacre in Raczak as a real event and to burden Miloshević with it, even if there are no appropriate witnesses. And appropriate witnesses are surely not due to the fact that there was no massacre in Raczak.
Germinal Civikov, “The Miloshević Process. Observer relationship’
Both acting on a political order, utilizing false evidence and bribed witnesses, were to prove that “crimes” of Miloshević justified NATO's unlawful intervention against Yugoslavia, to which the UN safety Council did not agree.
Anna Parzymies
- What does Peter Handke, the Nobel Prize laureate, gotta do with the illegal bombings of Yugoslavia by NATO troops that began on 24 March and ended on 10 June 1999?
- Why read the book “The Miloshević Process. An observer's account” by Germinal Civikov? Who's the author?
- What are the 3 top absurdities of the Miloshević trial that the author showed?
- When Miloshević in his beginning speech the day later responded to all these accusations, there was a violent and complete halt to broadcast by major news stations specified as CNN and the BBC – writes Cathrin Schutz in the text "Thinking about the legacy of the Miloshević process". Why was the trial silenced by the media?
- What NGOs, and how, supported blurring the fact about Miloshević's trial?
- South Africa accuses Israel of committing genocide on Palestinians in Gaza. Prosecutor of the global Criminal Court has applied for warrants to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and defence minister Joaw Galant for war crimes in the Gaza Strip. delight comment.
- What crucial question has no 1 always asked you about the subject we're talking about? And what is the answer to that?
Music "Also Sprach Zarathustra – Einleitung" – Kevin MacLeod, CC BY 3.0
