The metaphor about pigs and trough was, unfortunately, correct!

Krzysztof Bosak on X.

Over the years, I have read here various declarations of superiority from “stateists” over free conservatives, pro-market nationalists and cautious towards overgrown government traditionalists.

We were expected to not realize the sense of swollen state publishing and exaggerate with fears and skepticismm. We were going to present “failure” and minimalism, and they were going to present vision, courage, ethos, and state sense.

Today – after 8 years of playing “staters” in the patronage, historical policy and charity for money – we see that behind arrogant kind and pathetic rhetoric there was frequently waste and deficiency of standards at best, and in worse deals and theft veiled in laws, regulations and regulations.

The alleged right went to the proverbial "corite" with the slogans "moral revolution", "IV Rzeczpospolita, fight against irregularities, systems and injustice, and produced precisely the same systems and pathologies, if not worse. How did this happen? I know any of the people involved.

Let me give you my explanation of the situation. — the question of how it happened that good people started doing bad things.

First, In many of them, jealousy accumulated for years. The fact is that people with left-liberal options have more resources without comparison. This led any “right” to believe that “it belongs to us”. erstwhile power created a chance to transfer capital and equalize positions, they decided to take advantage of it. This approach was complementary to the utmost calculation of the president and Prime Minister. The brakes were releasing gradually. any dared others. If you could pump a fewer twelve or a fewer 100 thousand, why not millions? The pandemic has shown that everything can and that no 1 counts public money.

Second Many "righteous" are very afraid that they will not be effective enough. They want to be effective. They feel weak, but they want to play hard and win. They want to accomplish something and leave something behind. So they invented “works” to the degree of their capabilities and adapted to the cadential “time window”, premising alternatively fast shots than something evolutionaryly or organically built. There was no honest moral thought over both of these issues ("we should besides be," "we must be effective"), due to the fact that contrary to moral rhetoric from the law and left in the contemporary debate, neither this overt nor this spherical one, no moral consideration of politics (except for Tomasz Samolik and respective authors of the Jagiellonian Club). The leadership of the ruling camp, called the “right” to confuse Poles, besides played a fatal role.

This leadership carries in itself the memory of the founding thefts of the 3rd Republic of Poland, a large transfer of property and capital from the institution of the falling Polish People's Republic to the establishment of the emerging political capitalism of the 1990s. For this leadership, public-private transfer is not only not controversial. It is desirable if capital is put into the right hands. The fact that over 20 years of people entered the collective of citizens with the right to vote, who not only did not participate in the 1990s but besides do not remember them, remained in this leadership as though not noticed. There is inactive 1 who lives where he has got an apartment, not if he has creditworthiness.

So we're at a point where The "right" approach to public money proved not only not better than the rest, but in making the "hands" proved more catchy and little subtle. This fact needs to be acknowledged and learned.

The first conclusion I draw is that mocked the metaphor about pigs and trough was, unfortunately, fundamentally correct, and conservative-liberal skepticism towards the redistribution made by politicians is besides legitimate. I compose it as a nationalist and besides a stateist. due to the fact that the first task before statemen is not to embarrass your country, and citizens do not discourage it!

Over the years, I have read here various declarations of superiority from “stateists” over free conservatives, pro-market nationalists and cautious towards overgrown government traditionalists. We were expected to not realize the meaning of the swollen state...