- – It could be noted: it is good that this debate was conducted by Katarzyna Gójska and not by Michał Rachoń – says Dr. Krzysztof Grzegorzewski about the programme manager of tv Republika, who is privately married to Gójska. – possibly on tv the Republic realized that this debate had very advanced ratings and they were careful not to exposure themselves to Rachonia-style bias
- According to the mediologist, the biggest failure of Monday's debate is the competitive station supporting the right – i.e. in Poland24 Jack and Michał Karnowski. due to the fact that erstwhile organizing an event of specified a scope and with specified a scope of candidates, tv Republic decided to fight for priority, fought by both channels
- – He had to work with a speech therapist late – says an expert on Karol Nawrocki. – He advised him “man, if you talk quickly, you will begin to whisper so that people will not realize you.” And now Nawrocki speaks slowly, due to the fact that that is the only way he can talk alleged crevice voices, and only sometimes it “splits”
- More specified comments can be found on the Onetu homepage
A debate before the presidential election on Monday evening was organised by tv Republic. It was attended by candidates: Artur Bartoszewicz, Grzegorz Braun, Szymon Hołownia, Marek Jakubiak, Sławomir Mentzen, Karol Nawrocki, Krzysztof Stanowski, Joanna Senyszyn, Marek Woch and Adrian Zandberg.
The debater, Katarzyna Gójska, pointed out that tv invitations the Republic did not accept Rafał Trzaskowski and Magdalena Biejat. In addition, at the beginning of the programme, Braun pointed out the absence of Maciej Maciak (another from the candidates registered by the State Election Commission), throwing attention to the organizers: "something is not playing here". Temporary in the studio appeared Trzaskowski's cardboard image – brought by Jakubiak.
Medical: There are inactive no nonsubjective journalists, but...
“The Republic has managed well with the challenge of the debate,” says Dr. Krzysztof Grzegorzewski of the Department of Journalism and Social Communication of the University of Lodz. The medical expert is amazed because, he adds, "I remember what the same people did earlier on TVP and on Polish Radio and how public media corrupted".
– These are inactive no nonsubjective journalists, but it could be noted maliciously: it is good that this debate was conducted by Katarzyna Gójska and not Michał Rachoń – says Dr Grzegorzewski about the tv Republika's programme director, who is privately married to Gójska. According to the medical examiner, she was able to give the impression of disfavoring any of the candidates, and at the end of the cameras showed even that she was active in any pleasant interactions, including with Simon Holovnia or Joanna Senyszyn.
– possibly on tv the Republic realized that this debate had very advanced ratings and they were careful not to exposure themselves to bias in the Rachonia kind – the media expert guessed. But on the another hand, Dr. Grzegorzewski mentions examples of questions prepared by the organizers of the debate, which clearly favoured candidates from the right. "For example, whether Europe should become a super state. Or the introduction of the Euro, says the medical examiner.
According to Dr. Grzegorzewski, the biggest failure of Monday's debate is simply a competitive station, supporting the right – in Poland24 Jack and Michał Karnowski. Bo When organising specified an event with specified a scope of candidates, tv Republic decided to fight for priority, fought by both channels.
The Trzaskovsky Staff remembered "what the same people did to him during the 2020 campaign."
Did Rafał Trzaskowski do well not to accept tv Republic's invitation?
– It was the right decision and for respective reasons. It is better for him now, after a debate in Koński, whose expression was turned upside down just before it, to focus on the direct run – says Dr. Grzegorzewski.
The medical expert, although expecting that the coverage of TV's debate was greater than the average ratings of the station, has the belief that Trzaskowski in most viewers of this debate would not win support anyway. – And remember what the same people did to him during the 2020 campaign. This surely mattered for Trzaskovsky's staff erstwhile making decisions – says Dr. Grzegorzewski.
Mentzen with mantra, Nawrocks at the speech therapist
How does a mediologist measure the performance of another candidates on tv Republika?
– Sławomir Mentzen learned 1 mantra, “vote for me due to the fact that only I have a chance to win against Nawrock”, he was very pleased with himself, but most likely the look on his face erstwhile he saw that the station was doing the first interview after the debate with Nawrock – says Dr. Grzegorzewski. – The participation of Holowna is simply a consequence of the decision he made, leading to a "break-in" between Trzaskowski and Nawrocki in Koński. And now he must proceed to show this consequence.
The medical expert notes that Krzysztof Stanowski focused on attacking Holowna in the debate. “He is not neutral,” says Stanowski Dr. Grzegorzewski, noting that the creator of the “Zero Canal” frequently hits Trzaskowski. After Monday evening, the medical examiner is able to agree with the claims that Stanowski is an option of cryptopsis.
– Although at 1 point in the debate Stanowski "let go of the tone" and agreed to invitation the Holovnia to his channel and go with him to the game," adds the medical examiner.
Dr. Grzegorzewski praises another performance by Joanna Senyszyn.
– She is relaxed, she is simply a colorful figure, but “there will be no more bread.” On the another hand, it seems to me that in Koński Magdalena Biejat did rather well, due to the fact that on the left she did not have a competitor in the form of Adrian Zandberg: with his feud and control – Dr. Grzegorzewski estimates.
What about Charles Nawrock? The medical examiner pays attention to the way he speaks.
– erstwhile asked "how much is gender", he answered something like "there is simply a female gender, there is simply a male gender," He did not talk plural due to the fact that he feared that he would come out again “putio, putio”, although it could make a gag – notes the medical expert. “In addition, he had to work with a speech therapist recently, who advised him, “If you talk quickly, you’ll start whispering so much that people won’t realize you.” And now Nawrocki speaks slowly, due to the fact that that's the only way he can talk alleged crevice voices and only sometimes "extract": as in part of his message at the end of the debate.
