- The proceeding of Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik is another key component in the accounting of the regulation of Law and Justice. The problem is that the Pegasus committee depends on the goodwill of right-wing politicians or court decisions
- — During forced action, a possible complaint did not consequence in a halt. There's another mode of arrest. erstwhile we get a resolution that's beneficial to us, the witness will appeal, which will halt the race. If it's the another way around, we'll appeal. It will take months, explains the committee member
- The court rejected the motion to bring Ernest Bejda. The announcement entered an incorrect date — 13 January 2024, not 2025. He's another crucial witness who avoids testifying.
- — It all seems as though we have no cause, but we either agree to the regulation of law, or do national courts, explains our interviewer
- More crucial information can be found on the Onetu homepage
‘Fakap’ of the committee of inquiry
— This was a disgrace,” tells us anonymously a associate of the Pegasus investigation committee erstwhile we ask him about the decision of the territory Court in Warsaw, who rejected the application for punishment and forced the erstwhile CBA chief Ernest Bejda. “A simple mistake made us laughter again. It was a facap — adds another.
On Tuesday, Ernest Bejda reported on social media that the court had rejected the committee's request due to the fact that the call failed to enter the date of the hearing. alternatively of 13 January 2025, it was dated 13 January 2024. In addition, according to Bejda, the members of the committee of enquiry were deliberately not to add a defective letter.
As we hear, the call of the erstwhile CBA manager was written in early January this year. The individual liable for this took the format from December last year and simply forgot to change the date. And while, logically speaking, everyone knew erstwhile the proceeding was due, the court had to trust on the document. And that's how the committee died.
— We will appeal the court's decision and call him again to bring this procedure. This does not make Bejda not testify, but unfortunately the road to it will extend. This all seems as though we have no cause, but we either agree to the regulation of law or do national courts, explains our speaker.
There is besides a belief among the commentators that the members of the committee did not show up during the proceeding of erstwhile head of CBA Agnieszka Kwiatkowska-Gurdak, who repeatedly covered the rules on operating methods and techniques. Abstaining from replying was a service agent paid for losing her position.
Therefore, the committee is looking forward to a fresh opening: "We have reiterated the conclusions of evidence to the CBA in the area where Mrs Kwiatkowska-Gurdak refused to cooperate. It's about giving you concrete documents. I hope that cooperation will be better now.
Kamiński and Wąsik on target
While with Ernest Beją, who has no public office and no immunity, there should be no major problems, the committee of enquiry will surely gotta give a gimmick to interview current MEPs of PiS, Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik.
Mariusz Kamiński is simply a erstwhile head of the Ministry of abroad Affairs and peculiar Services coordinator from 2015 to 2023. In the past, he besides led the CBA. Maciej Wąsik, in turn, is simply a longtime associate of Mariusz Kamiński and his deputy, both at CBA and later at the Ministry of abroad Affairs.
Former heads of the Ministry of abroad Affairs were expected to attest on Tuesday, but on social media they reported they would not appear in the Sejm In front of the Pegasus committee.
"I refuse to attend the gathering of the alleged Pegasus Investigative Commission on 4 March 2025. The Constitutional Court ruling of 10 September 2024 makes it clear that this committee
In a akin entry, Mr Wąsik said: “I declare that I will not attend the call for today’s proceeding >commission>commission
Our interlocutors from the committee of enquiry declare that in the case of Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik they will “go the way of Ziobro”. This means that applications for punishment will be directed, and if it does not help, they will search forced or even detention. For these drastic steps, the European Parliament's approval to waive their immunity will be needed.
— If they don't remember, Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik will go where they belong, that is, to the detention. We will be ruthless,” says a politician from the ruling organization who sits on the Pegasus committee.
Judicial conflict of Ziobro
The interrogation of Kamiński and Wąsik is simply a very distant subject, as is the evidence of Zbigniew Ziobro. Only this week he went to the territory Court in Warsaw request for detention against erstwhile Minister of Justice to question him before the committee.
Politicians from the Coalition on October 15 spread their hands erstwhile we ask them about the slow pace of work. — Resisting all requests from the committee of enquiry for a court of law makes this work worse. But what choice do we have? We have no — we hear.
Vice-President of the Pegasus Committee of enquiry Tomasz Trela reported that Zbigniew Ziobra's interview was planned to be spread for 3 days. The proposal even includes circumstantial dates. “ We have the opinion of experts that Mr. Ziebra’s speech apparatus can function up to 2 hours a day due to his illness,” says Leftist politician.
However, they are already well aware that in all instance the substance can get stuck for up to 2 months. This means that the court decisions that are not favourable to the committee may be extended considerably. possibly 4 months, possibly six months, or a year. We're expected to keep the committee open for a year? It'll be like a legal clinic.
Another interviewer in the committee explains: “During forced action, a possible complaint did not stop. There's another mode of arrest. erstwhile we get a resolution that's beneficial to us, the witness will appeal, which will halt the race. If it's the another way around, we'll appeal. It'll take months.
