– I'm disappointed. veto of the president on the Emergency Act – said PSL MP Marek Sawicki in “Guest of Events”. He added that the translations of president Margaret Paprocka's chief Chancellery are "irrational". – In this bill no 1 violated the prerogatives of judges – he explained.
Sawicki stated that the designation of specified an crucial act as the election of the head of state had, according to the Act, decide 15 ultimate Court judges with the longest duration. "This bill did not address the question of the alleged neo-judges at all," he noted.
– Mrs. Paprocka forgets that the same ultimate Court in the 3 chambers ruled that The home of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs is not a court, that is how another European tribunals later ruled," said the PSL MP. "Therefore, the president should open his ears to what is going on outside and should sign this bill," he said.
VIDEO: Sawicki disappointed by Duda's decision. “He should open his ears”
Presidential election. Sawicki: There may be problems
Leading Bogdan Rymanowski asked what further scenarios were in connection with the upcoming presidential election. “There have already been respective elections in connection with specified a state,” said Sawicki. – But there may be problems erstwhile 1 organization says that the validity of the election was decided by non-judges, and the other, that the choice is not valid due to the fact that the trial was not in accordance with the constitution – he explained.
SEE: Emergency Act. The President's decision.
Mr PSL pointed out that if the voltage scale was not lowered, Maybe adequate for that.Like riots on the streets. – On Friday in the Sejm, Prime Minister Tusk made a very concluding performance. And then the debate ran out of that approach. As an experienced parliamentarian, I had to inform the PiS MPs, due to the fact that sometimes they acted like boys in short shorts," he said.
Emergency Act. Veto of president Andrzej Duda
President Andrzej Duda vetoed the alleged "accident law" – she passed Head of president Margaret Paprock's Chancellery. “There is no another way to measure this law than as an effort to indicate a different lineup to find the validity of the elections,” she stressed, explaining the decision to veto.
– It was hard to anticipate and the president in talks with Marshal Simon Holovnia He did not hide it so that specified a bill could find acceptance. The president decided to veto this bill in accordance with Article 122(5) of the Constitution, which is to mention it to a re-examination by the Sejm," declared Paprock.
SEE: Concerns about the validity of the election. Marek Sawicki proposed a fresh solution
As proposed by Parliament in February, the validity of the presidential election was to be decided by the 15th oldest seniority of ultimate Court judges, not the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, whose position is challenged by part of the political and judicial environment.
