After the NATO summit in Ankara (July 7, 2026), optimism arose in countries that form a common front against the erstwhile russian empire, present the Russian federation, which uses a policy almost identical to the erstwhile USSR, and besides with fierce tenacity tries to re-create the no longer existing borders of Stalin's fallen empire and its successors. president Donald Trump besides arrived at the conference in Turkey, although he had a individual disagreement with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, while Spanish Prime Minister Sanchez treats even worse and breaks ties with this country. However, this did not affect the full meeting, as plans for joint reinforcements against the aggressive Russian federation were set up and supported by Canada and the US. And so it was determined that the production of Patriot missiles, as well as ATACAMS and Stinger systems, as well as Abrams tanks, would begin. From Belgium to Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, Poland or Sweden, as well as Germany and France, the European continent is mobilising efforts to counter Russia's threats and is eager to devote 5% of its budgets to arms. president Trump seems satisfied, although he complained that NATO did not support his conflict with Iran, most likely forgetting that the Natish alliance has been defensive since its inception and that its goal is to halt Kremlin aggression. And I think that explains NATO's attitude towards the war on Iran. Trump's objections are so irrelevant, but 1 can wonder if the Russian “military operation” in Ukraine makes any sense? For 4 years now there has been a bloody conflict in which the victim is not only the Ukrainian people, but besides the Russian people. Massively, Russian attackers are besides killed, possibly even more losses are suffered as an attacker on the front, while Ukrainians are striking from hiding. And there's no sign of any change in these battles, due to the fact that as the president of Finland says, the Russians are already born with imperial DNA as if stamped by the government in the Kremlin, they must then die on the fronts of imperial wars!
But must the countries of Europe be condemned to the constant threat of post-bolshevik aggression? The Russians, on the another hand, for a meaningless blood donation forced in attempts to take out fresh territories, countries... Let us perceive to the cries of mothers who lost their sons, and frequently could not even bury them...
And if it does not substance to the Kremlin's rulers, due to the fact that they ignore the lives of their own citizens, let us perceive to another reasons, and can they be heard even in the voice of this year's Nobel laureate in physics, David Gross, who warns that humanity has small chance of surviving the next 50 years(!)...So in specified a perspective, do imperial wars (and all other) have any meaning??? I don't think, and I'm certain no sensible man would give orders to invade fresh territories or violate the sovereignty of smaller states only to revive the old, grim thought of an empire in the end of history, especially as humanity should prosecute universal brotherhood across the borders of the state piers and besides tiny republics!
Marek Baterovich
