Marcin Drewicz: inactive this mistake of the ANTY-MISSIONAL Part I: “SELF REFORMS” ON THE WEST OF THE “IRON CURTY”
The reception of the “reforms of the Second Vatican Council” was in the Universal Church on both sides of russian ‘iron curtain’ Different. Has anyone presented a monograph in Polish? Are we inactive only in the area of publicist occasional causes? Which, of course, does not mean that they would all be without cognitive value.
In relation to, among others, Poland, we are talking already in the context of the 1960s and later on about the "change of councils". Well, then there were no changes? Where were they? In the mentality of millions of Catholics in Poland. individual who was a kid at the time – we are inactive talking about the communist PRL of the time of the Council and later – from no of those people who were filled (then) at Sunday Masses of the Holy Churches had a chance to find out that here was just a "change".
He could not remember it himself, but at least on any occasion he could hear that "now the priest stands before and until late he was behind" and that "now he is speaking in Polish and until late in Latin; but the sermons were always in Polish". And that's it! Don't deny it! The kid could only motion with a motion – "If you say so, so it is." Since average Catholics, and younger ones, said this, and the old ones whose “counsel reform” had already met the end of their long and hard lives.
The revolution, the slaughter, the robbery and the destruction, the famine, the war, the unbelief, the occupation, the insurrection, the Stalinism and the subsequent commune—they were for those generations on our side of the "iron curtain" these determinants of the distress of life. “Thank God that in Poland Mass is celebrated as before (!!!). For in these another around KDLs the churches closed people in general.”
And besides, what happens in the temple, “it is not up to us, it is up to the priests, due to the fact that they are educated in this direction, they know it, not us.” But – what was most crucial on the east side of the “iron curtain” at the time – “this full godless commune is increasingly throwing itself into the fight against the Church; so priests must be supported”.
And so in Poland it was not widely perceived that these "coordinary changes" were not anticipated at all, in the 1980s and early 1990s. – in this era with a backpack on the back of "Pope", or triumphant millions of gatherings on the occasion of Pope John Paul II's pilgrimages to Homeland.
For, as far as it is known to the author of this – the first of this reflection, let us call it, fundamentally "trident", and in general cognition (!!!) about what actually happened on the Second Vatican Council and what has become more and more (!!!), throughout the universal Church, dates in Poland for the mid-1990s. It was only then that it was possible to hear, in any places, (some, but not many in the 1980s), and not from a priest (!!!) about who they were and what they deserved, or popes surviving and operating in the 19th and 20th centuries.
Since the mid-1990s, it's been... 30 years! 1 generation. And for so many years these priests and the environment are operating in Poland, celebrating the Roman Catholic Mass before the Second Vatican Council. Thus this break between this centuries-old mass and universal celebration of the Holy Mass, the alleged Tridentic, traditional, "in Latin", and the beginning of the reminder of it in the period already "postobor" in inactive (!!!) fewer places, measured in Poland about a 4th century, again: 1 generation – from the threshold of the 1970s to the mid-1990s.
In fact, much more than 1 generation, since present besides (2026) this inactive multimillion-dollar general of Poles "going to church on Sunday" do NOT know anything about the Trident Mass or about the fact that we have any discrimination in the church (and now besides teaching!) "postoborous" (recently besides called "modernist", which, however, present is besides widely extended) and "pre-laborate" (we apologize for utilizing this useful jargon-natification).
And especially about this PERMANENT EXTERNAL close is our statement.
Let us look at as much common as I reported on the subject of Holy Baptism. The case has been getting more serious lately, about quality and quantity. Here are the most average young Catholics, along with all the baptized families, grandmothers, aunts, and cousins, in full CONFIDENTY (!!!) bring their baby kid to the temple to be baptized by the priest. How will he baptize them? What's it to them? After all, “in Catholic”. You already know how to do that.
Because these baptisms present – but now I think they are truly “modern”, and God forbid! – they are late conducted during Sunday Mass, in the presence of all the faithful who arrived for Mass, everyone can watch and perceive to (microphone, sound system) how it happens. However, erstwhile we return home, we look at the “pre-objective” Mass or Prayer, where, among another things, the text of the Holy Baptism liturgy is written – note! I mean, different from the 1 just heard in the church.
Thus, we suspend this baptismal subject of our consideration by asking whether the present youngest generation of Poles and Catholics is so willingly baptized by today's clergy... in a crucial way (sic!). For something in this “new baptismal formula” is lacking. Isn't it? Shouldn't a future Pope have any highest-ranking ruling, like... at 1 time to complete all these now millions of Holy Baptisms given for any time, so to say... “quickly-uncarefully”?
That is at least our highest concern, this problem of recognition. due to the fact that since time is constantly flowing, we already have a “speed” of baptized young adults, including most likely young priests, monks and nuns. Everyone, or almost all of them, does not even realize that it was, at that place and at that time, made... "quickly-uncarefully."
An old Polish proverb says, “Where a man rushes, there the devil rejoices.” We will return to the issue of Baptism.
C.D.N.
We besides recommend: The Ukrainian female set her hair on fire
