Marcin Drewicz: IMPROVING FOR THE SACRATION OF matrimony DID THE LIST OF BISKUPS “About the Family” FROM LAST SUN 2025, Part Three.
Stand in the Truth! fact is the compatibility of thoughts (names) with a thing. Calling a thing by name – this is what has always been the task before all pastoralists headed by bishops. And only then will undertake the pastoral activities established by the Holy Church – in the face of carefully recognized and named reality. Atoli has been with us for a long time now, unfortunately, differently.
At the same time, it is in our opinion that "to 1 sack" are loaded by the authors and signatories of the Episcopal List at the same time by the various types of concubines and singles surviving "in various types of irregular situations" (1, what a cloudy and sad language, highly untheological!), for which there are no canonical obstacles to the Sacrament of Marriage.
They do not, however, do not, due to the fact that the benefit of the absence of obstacles they ignore (sic!) or even perceive (sic!); and with them those who, on the contrary, consciously desire the Sacrament of Marriage, but may never join it due to this canonical obstacle – since the sacramental spouse of the divorcee inactive lives.
The authors and signatories of the Episcopal Letter discussed here go very far in their own way, so to speak, language manipulations, saying that we will remember, "Every 1 of us as a disciple of Jesus (24) was redeemed at the price of His Blood." Who utilized this quote (and others about what next)? A simple exchange of the chronology of Salvation and what a large mistake! Is it just a private amateur theologian who must uncover that:
First, the Lord Jesus redeemed all men with his passion, and these are to each another fellows (if many of them do not know it yet). What is different, then, is learning the teaching of the Lord Jesus, and yet what is different is his taking in applicable and everyday life, and only then will he become his practicing disciple, in any time, in any country.
So these redeemed ones are not the same as the disciples—although the missionaries of all times (the actual ones of course) are working to make the message of Jesus scope all men. Those who know the teachings of the Lord Jesus, but ignore them and live not according to them, for they are not Jesus disciples. But... they can always start becoming them. That's the difference. “From errors and at the time of death you can be reproved,” says the Classic.
Besides, these 3 references to fragments from St. Peter, John, and Paul were chosen by the editor of the Episcopal Letter, in a way, inadequately. You can't do that! Thus, in these circumstantial cases, neither "students," nor "death," nor "resurrection," can be found by anyone after reaching for a home copy of the fresh Testament.
The Holy Texts are not to juggle them as they please. The editor of the Episcopal List, speaking the language of squad games, played the ball "for memory", on the rule of "hit-not-hit". You can't do that! After all, we are talking not about anything, but – on the contrary – about the Sacred Cases of the ultimate Weight.
There are inactive 4 another parts (I-III, V) "Pastrum of the Polish Episcopal Conference on the Holy household – 28 December 2025" and a short introduction to it – the whole, at least for our sensitivity and perceptiveness, maintained in the kind of this fresh language from Anglo-Saxon post-Protestant "romantic comedy" or from its close-up goat "in psychotherapist". In our amateur opinion, this is no longer the Holy Theology, but only any "good-looking" and "self-being" loose talk.
The Episcopal Letter repeats the phrase: “God dreams of a household that is home to love” (14), which is besides a subtitle for the full statement. So, God is “the dreamer”? I think this is simply a violation of the Second Commandment of God. But millions of Catholics in Poland had to hear this conviction respective times in thousands of churches during Sunday Mass on 28 December of the Year 2025.
The most in our opinion is simply a twisted, bold passage and the crucial silences of the Episcopal List. Do you encourage P.T. Readers to read and reflect on the full (available online)? To learn something “about matrimony and family” it is not. It is better to scope the encyclical of Pope Pius XI “Casti connubii” or another truly (!) Catholic texts (the word “real” was introduced by the authors themselves).
But whoever settles in a Catholic teaching on a given subject can read texts specified as the Episcopal Letter read on 28 December 2025 to admit the way Catholic teaching is distorted (sic!).
Let us hope that, as in the case of respective another "controversial" Episcopal Letters in the 21st century, all Catholics in Poland will let go and this 1 despite their ears, so without harming themselves. However, we compose all of this with large regret and expanding anxiety.
More and more often, this method is used: the editing of documents, including those "ecclesiastical" (councils to preserve or remove), as if neither the Ancient Magisterium of the Church, nor, in 1 way or another, the texts of culture inspired by it so far existed.
What precedes their authors is simply a white card. They were born “ yesterday”, little than a week ago, so they compose various quirks that come to their mind. In a period something else will come to mind, all the same thing, and then they will announce it in full and in front of – this attitude seems to be presented by the authors and signatories of this "Letter of the Polish Episcopal Conference for the Holy Family", read at the Holy Mass on 28 December 2025.
It's a substance of impoundingly patting on people's shoulders – just the same and telling everyone that... "it'll be fine, it's fine," and that's fundamentally the end. And this confidant manner of speech goes beyond... holiness. What's this for and what's it expected to do?
The authors of the letter seemingly did not scope to the encyclical ‘Casti connubii’ (about Christian marriage) Pope Pius XI, neither to Maria Rodziewiczów's books, nor to the fresh “No Dogma” by Henryk Sienkiewicz himself, nor to the “Dollka” of Prussia, nor to the book “Women-Revolution-Cashion” published in 2018 by Sławomir N. Gworzycki, nor to the book Bartosz Kopczyński's “The Revolution of Bacchanki” published in 2025 (and we have not yet read it), nor to the full multitude of another texts that supply informative and inspiring content.
Observations about the current Polish "family life" (councils not without reason) these authors and signatories of the "Pastual List" besides have seemingly flawed and already excavated, as a manifestation of the misuse of the naming of cases would seem to be, the simplest (which does not mean that all necessarily the most pleasant). And in fact, it is not for us any "shepherd letter" due to the fact that we, based on the adoption of the intertwined actual and false sentences, do not intend to "paste" our soul.
This letter is any kind of alleged "soul-past GMO"; not the first of its kind in fresh times, that we will mention for example the glories (sic!) from the last Sunday of 2013 about as much mysterious as the already silent "gender" (the mysterious "lgbt" in his place), or those from May 2019 concerning any "molesting" or something like that. Ah, that neo-pseudo-theology!
As in erstwhile akin cases, we hope – with regret and with concern – that the general public, like him, no longer remembers (sic!), as the priest from the pulpit (from pulpit) read on Sunday on 28 December 2025. He read due to the fact that his church authority ordered him to. That's it. In turn everyone, including those who are angry heard there, and then we encourage to read again this encyclical “Casti connubia” or fragments of “marriage and family” from 1 of the older ones, or “pre-sobor” Catechisms.
These texts, unlike in the godless PRL, are available present in respective book editions in Polish, and there is besides something on the Internet. Separate papers-discourses-guides about (real!) Catholic matrimony can besides be found today.
Since authors and signatories of the Episcopal Letter quoted above emphasize, despite everything, this "trueness", we are eagerly following them. This happened in the liturgical memory of the Niewiniątek Slaughter (28 December), although in the “Letter” of the Saints, the words were not mentioned. In spite of the subject substance of the "Letter", these fundamental concepts – neither "revelationship", nor "marriage", nor "family", nor "parenting" – are defined in it. Why?
possibly due to the fact that present there are many definitions in the media circulation, so the authors of the "Letter", which would by all means be compromising... hesitate over the choice. If this was indeed the case – what can we not know – then what is it, in truth, today, that the highest work of the Teachers' Office?
Finally, let everyone realize that present we have in “Catholic Poland” (in another countries similarly) a clear percent increase in the number of children and young people born and born outside of the sacramental, unbaptized, unreligious, depolonized, not having a model of marriage-family life from home, and frequently and a pattern of simple interpersonal references, now mixed (who allowed it?) with besides unincorporated children and refugees, godless, post-Soviet, post-Bander, post-Bander, post-bolshevik (nothing in nature does not perish) and another non-Catholic nations necessarily (!).
In general, in Poland children are being born less and little among the countries of Europe. These are besides the effects of this “progressive pastoral ministry”.
What will be next with Poland?
We besides recommend: Hundreds of immigrants got the PESEL number for bribes
