Marcin Bogdan: Thieves 2

But in addition to robbing the state as such, there is besides approval to bargain inside state structures, to bargain from citizens. The best example of this is the charges against Roman Gierty. However, the case of Polnordu and the charge of bringing out almost 90 million zlotys, although it was a serious criminal charge, did not provoke moral opposition in society. Although Polonord was a stock company listed on the stock exchange, the stock exchange is associated with capital investment, frequently by large players, by financial “reins”. In general, it's a different world, it doesn't concern us, it's not our money, it's not our problem.

A completely different sound is the case revealed by journalists of Virtual Poland. The Getin Bank case, which was massively granting franc loans. After the misleading borrowers began complaining to the bank in court, Roman Gierty concluded a curiosity cooperation agreement with Getin Bank. It is known that both parties to the trial have the right to an attorney, but the function of a lawyer is to effort to defend the client in order to get an acquittal. The Getin Bank agreement with Giertych's law firm, however, was so drawn up that Giertych received multi-million-dollar gratuities not for winning the case, but for dismissing the adverse judgement at the time, i.e. for delaying the case. The prosecutors of Getin Bank were joined by a driver and safety defender Giertych, known by the alias “Foka”, and began to fill the court with various formal applications, this without signature, and this without a corresponding court fee. It takes years, not months, but years, to play on time. And the passing of time without conclusive judgement brought further advanced bonuses to Roman Giertych. And so, over 8 million.

Only that the another side of the process was Frankish, average people, average “bread eaters”, who took credit in good religion to supply themselves and their families with their dream homes. The artificial hold of the case not only dismissed the possible of a favourable judgement for them, but enabled the main shareholder of the bank to transfer the assets. Now, even if the court yet sentences the case, the bank will be bankrupt and there will be no way to get the compensation due to customers. Very mean, very perfidious. Multi-million-dollar gratuities for a law firm built on hurting thousands of average people whose lives were ruined. erstwhile asked about the matter, Donald Tusk replied: “I am not engaged in the law practice of Mr. Roman Giertych, let him explain himself to his professional accomplishments or various circumstances. I'm not interested. I am curious in the behaviour of Mr Roman Giertych as an MP”.

Himalayas of hypocrisy and cynicism. It doesn't substance to Tusk that individual steals, rapes or murders. It is crucial that he raises his hand erstwhile voting. I wrote rapes. It's not an exaggeration. In fresh days, information has emerged about further cases of pedophilia among activists of the Civic Platform. Sentences have been filed. For Tusk, it doesn't substance what harm individual does in non-party activities, it's what they do for the party. But in order not to combine pedophile tendencies with the name Platform or Civic Coalition they were ordered to obey media that could no longer silence the full case to inform the public that convicted pedophiles were just activists of a large party. large Party, in short, DuPa. It's a good mention to the subject of the affair. In time, this word may become a fresh name for this group. I feel that for Donald Tusk the large Party, in short, the DuPa, which he is both a associate and a president of, is more crucial than Poland. I besides wonder where the pro-development plans and investments that were to be the driver of the Polish economy went. Does Tusk have them in D...?

Mr Bogdan

***