Marcin Bogdan: religion and Science

For people who effort to undermine religion through science, the Turinian Shroud has become a large challenge, more specifically the question of perpetuating the image of a man on the canvas of the shroud. Researchers who argue the discipline of religion realize that they must at all costs show that this image was created naturally, explained, that it can be scientifically explained how it happened. And it would be best if we could do a modern experiment, a technological experiment, of course, which would consequence in the creation of a akin image.

Let us briefly remind what these scientists are dealing with. In the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Turin is stored linen ceremony canvas called the Turin Shroud. The image of the man who died as a consequence of the crucifixion was recorded on this canvas. In the sanctuary in Manoppello is made of the fines of Chusta Weronika, on which the image of the face is established. The Oviedo Cathedral in Spain, on the another hand, features a linen scarf with visible blood stains. What's the connection between these 3 relics? In all 3 cases, the same blood kind was found. The strategy of blood stains on Oviedo's chest corresponds to the morning visible on the Kiss and the facial features on Manoppello's chest are consistent with the image from the Turin Shroud. Compliance concerns the proportion and asymmetry of the face, characteristic nose, hair arrangement and beard, but besides identical signs of trauma, namely swelling in the cheek area, traces of blood in the area of the nose and forehead, and characteristic wounds corresponding to the thorn crown.

But the real challenge for scientists is how to make and fix images on the Turin Kiss and the Manoppello Brush. The brush is made of fine linen, a uncommon fabric obtained from the secretion of sea clams. The German historian and writer Paul Badde in his fascinating book “Divine Face” tells about the production of bisor and attempts to fix images on specified fabric. In the case of the Turin Shroud, the simplest way to undermine the authenticity of the canvas was to find from which age it originated. A carbon dating method was used, but a example for investigation was taken from a fragment that was crafted after a fire in the 14th century. erstwhile this “scientific error” was discovered, investigation was renewed, which showed that the Turin Shroud actually dates back to 2000 years. However, the problem that was inactive insurmountable was the creation and preservation of the Turkish image on the Hull. The survey was so coupled with artificial intelligence, which made a breakthrough. For it has been shown that the fixed image does not fit the wrap around a full, three-dimensional body. For this it is perfectly liable for the deformations that arise erstwhile the fabric is stretched to a comparatively flat relief.

As a consequence of these studies, it was announced, which published various technological and pseudo-scientific journals that closer to unknown “The artist in the mediate Ages carved a shallow form of face and body, then pulled a linen sheet on it and Somehow, he pulled the painting.It’s okay. ” I have the advice for these scientists to do the following experiment. On a flat surface, the deceased should be placed, covered with canvas, erstwhile wrapping the body closely, and the another time laying loosely, as on a relief. And then somehow origin the dead to emergence again. If in both versions of the experimentation conducted, the canvas will reflect the image, compare which 1 is closer to the image on the Turin Kiss.

Well somehow Yeah.

Mary Magdalene, seeing the stone removed from the grave, alerted Simon Peter and the another disciple with the words: «The Lord was taken from the grave and we do not know where He was laid». [John 20, 3]. The apostles ran to the grave convinced that Jesus ’ body was taken by someone. «Then came Simon Peter, following him.He went inside the grave and saw the linen lying downand a scarf that was on his head, lying not together with canvas, but separately rolled in 1 place. Then the another disciple, who came first to the grave, besides entered into the interior. He saw and believed». [Jan 20, 6-8]. What did this disciple see that he believed in the Resurrection? Did he see something that scientists with the best technologies of the 21st century can't do?

Mr Bogdan

***