Marcin Bogdan: The European Union declares war on the United States

What happened on 28 February 2025 in the Oval Office cannot be understood without referring to 2 another dates, the key dates of planet politics of the 21st century. The first date was October 24, 2007 and Vladimir Putin's speech at the Munich safety Conference. It was then that Putin openly negated the political order formed after 1991. He denied the application of global law, denied the existence of democratic values, and the accession of fresh states to NATO and the rocket defence shield declared "threat to peaceIt’s okay. ” It was purely a war narrative.

Europe, the European Union, neither then nor later, has drawn any conclusions from this speech. At the time, the head of the German SPD commented on the speech: "I don't truly realize what Vladimir Putin was trying to say. ... I think it's just rhetoric from Vladimir Putin, I don't think there's anything more serious to it". Germany and the EU did not realize then, nor did they realize later, or did they not want to understand. They did not realize after Russia's invasion of Georgia in early August 2008, they did not realize after the assassination of the president of Poland and the full Polish delegation going to Katyń on 10 April 2010, did not realize after the annexation of Crimea in February 2014. The European Union did not full realize the threat to peace in Europe besides after Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

The European Union has built its identity and its "potence" in contrast to Christian values and Christian tradition, based on the sick ideology of green eco-gender disorder. The EU is an undemocratic, anti-democratic structure. It is ruled by Commissioners who are not elected but by appointment. They are appointed by the European Council, which includes the leaders of the associate States. The rule of unanimity is in practice replaced by the rule of qualified majority, where the number of votes of individual members depends on the size of the population of the country. This clearly rewards the most many countries.

What happened on 28 February 2025 in the White home cannot be understood without mention to the second key date, namely, until 14 February 2025, without mention to the speech of U.S. Vice president J.D. Vance at the next Munich safety Conference. J.D. Vance's speech was most likely the first so clear and comprehensive consequence to Putin's speech given in the same place 18 years earlier. Vance's words, unlike Putin's war rhetoric, referred to peace, to the possible conditions for restoring peace in Ukraine and maintaining peace throughout Europe. The vice president of the United States firmly stated that peace is only possible on the foundation, possibly not so much value as simply normal. He clearly stated that peace in relations with Russia cannot be achieved erstwhile the law itself is broken and the fundamental principles of democracy are violated. J.D. Vance recalled Romania from the name, in which the presidential election was cancelled, citing secret data from peculiar servants.

The European Union's consequence to this speech by J.D. Vance was the arrest of Calin Georgesc, candidate for president of Romania. The 1 who won in December 2024, annulled later, I circular the election with 22.94% support. The detention of Calin Georgesc for respective hours in custody had no mention to the current, interior Romanian policy. It was a signal to the US: you can criticize us for overturning the election, and we, if we want, can even arrest the lead candidate. Picanteria adds the fact that the president of Romania, who after the annulment of the election voluntarily extended his office was Klaus Werner Iohannis, a politician of German nationality, a longtime leader of the Democratic German Forum in Romania. Klaus Iohannis, of course, has good relations with the German Chancellor and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen. A unusual coincidence is that the fresh elections in Romania were scheduled for 4 May 2025, so that the second round, 18 May, would cover the first circular of elections in Poland. It will be easier to nullify elections in both countries erstwhile the sound of possible protests is dispersed. The planet will more easy accept lawlessness in Poland by storming lawlessness in Romania. Conspiracy theory? This is what European Commission Vice-President Henna Virkkunen announced that there will be a circular table on the presidential elections in Poland soon! This is more than an unauthorized abroad interference in the interior affairs of Poland.

Calin Georgescu's arrest was the preparation of the ground for Donald Trump's talks with Volodymyr Żelenski. European leaders have concluded that the ideology of green eco-gender disorder is more crucial to them than peace. They felt it was better to hazard war on Russia than to renounce a sick ideology. For them, for the European Union's 'elite', the war against Russia is little evil than the threat of returning normality to Europe. That is why European leaders have placed a ultimatum in Żelentek. Either the US or Europe. If he signs a deal with Trump, if the United States negotiates peace terms with Russia, Europe will be cut off from Ukraine. If Ukraine expects support from Europe, it must cut off from the US. Lulenski didn't fly to Washington to sign the contract. He flew to tell Trump that the United States is persona non grata in Europe.

A fewer days before Trump's gathering with Żelenski, there was a hysteria in Europe that the US wanted to take control of Ukrainian uncommon earth metallic resources, or alternatively the resources of alleged critical natural materials. The information that has accessed the media shows that the proposed agreement was a win-win agreement. Many people measure trade agreements in terms of sports, so individual wins individual else has to lose. It's frequently called a zero-sum game. individual gains at the expense of individual who loses and the balance sheet is zero. But in business it is possible to play a affirmative sum in which both sides win. Win-win agreements are contracts in which both (all) parties benefit. This was the nature of the founding agreement of the first oil mine on Polish lands. The parties to the agreement were the inventor of the oil lamp Ignacy Łukasiewicz, with investment funds Titus Trzeżeski and the owner of oil-based areas Karol Klobassa. As co-participants of this project, they all succeeded and gained large wealth. Each of them alone, based only on knowledge, or only on capital, or only on property, would accomplish nothing. The agreement between the U.S. and Ukraine, on the basis of public information, was intended to have this kind of wine-wine agreement and should not be criticised as specified a priori.

So it was not a unilateral agreement, and not its records were the reason for breaking up the talks. The actual reason for the break-up of the talks was the unilateral declaration of Cold War by Europe to the United States, was the effort to push the US out of Europe. Volodymyr Żelenski was not the subject of talks in the Oval Office, he was just an actor who played the function written to him by European leaders. A tragic role, unfortunately. Many people justice the course of this conversation from the position of the host and guest. From the position of the beautiful proverb “Guest in the House, God in the House.” But perceive carefully to this conversation. With his firm hands, the Slavic said: “From the beginning of the war, we were alone.It’s okay. ” This is simply a public provocation and insult to Americans (and besides to Poles). Just a day later, during talks with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the same Żelenski said with a smile, without any gesture: “I thank the British for their support from the beginning of the war”. Coincidence? alternatively a "speak" in the kind of Barbara Nowacka. Volodymyr Żelenski, during a conversation in the White House, clearly pursued short circuit, provoked. He told the Americans that they did not know what war was, and threatened to say that “They will feel the effects of war in the futureIt’s okay. ” This was said in the presence of Vice president Vance, who during Iraq wars served from 2003 to 2007 in United States Marine Corps. I do not compare and compare the war in Ukraine to the Iraq War, but Vance prides himself on putting his life at hazard for the United States, which he has repeatedly emphasized in his pre-election speeches. Didn't Lulenski and his advisors know that? Did they not know that individual like Vance, for the sake of negotiation, should be flattered, saying that he himself knows best how cruel war is? They knew perfectly well. They consciously said something completely different.

Already the next day after the talks broke, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni called for negotiations between Europe and the United States. Before 28 February, it seemed that negotiations between Ukraine and Russia were needed to reconstruct peace in Europe. After 28 February, it appeared that negotiations between the EU and the US were needed to warrant peace in Europe. Only that the leaders of the European Union are not curious in specified talks. They did not respond, they did not respond to the Italian Prime Minister's appeal at all. Giorgia Meloni was elected by Italy as Prime Minister of their country after she declared publicly: "I'm a woman. I'm a mother. I'm Italian.It’s okay. ” Her power, like Trump's, is based on normality. That is why Giorgia Meloni is ready to talk to the US, she is not afraid of these talks, more, she understands perfectly that peace in Europe depends on these talks. But do another European leaders realize that? The next day, after Zielenski's broken talks with Trump, Norwegian company Haltbakk Bunkers refused to supply fuelfor the American Army, including US submarines entering Norwegian ports. More, the Norwegian company has called on European companies to sabotage American troops stationed in Europe in a akin way. This is more than the cold-war beating of politicians, it's the public making Europe's conflict with the US.

European leaders would alternatively put their countries at war with Russia than renounce the sick ideology of green eco-gender disorder. This suicide game is played by the coalition on 13 December. Donald Tusk Bunchusically stated that 500 million Europeans would defend themselves against 140 million Russians without the aid of 300 million Americans. What defensive actions did the Polish government and the Polish authorities take? The ultimate Court was considering the simplification of the sex change procedure as a substance of urgency. In doing so, he made a remarkable discovery stating that “Gender revision is akin to the procedure for correcting a civilian position act". In the face of the threat of Russia's attack on Europe, in the face of the threat of planet War III, the Polish authorities are considering whether parents of the petent, or only his possible children, or possibly both, should be a organization to proceedings for sex change. And whether a possible spouse should be a organization to the proceedings. And whether he, according to the constitutional evidence that matrimony is simply a relation between a female and a man, should not, for symmetry, besides change his sex to the opposite. It's crucial due to the fact that no substance who the man was born, no substance who he dies. And war at the borders.

Is war inevitable? is simply a Europe possessed by the madness of green eco-gender disorder through to destruction? Europe, rejecting cooperation with the US, pushing the United States out of Europe, is taking a immense risk. But European leaders, in case of a Russian attack, have an ace up their sleeve. This ace is simply a peace plan that Europe will propose to Russia. The core of this peace plan will be the limit of influence, the demarcation limit set on the Vistula. The territories to the east of Vistula will be dedicated to Russia, and Polish lands to the west of Vistula will be part of a united Europe under German leadership. This plan has been prepared for a long time and it is most likely already on the table. This is why the erstwhile PO-PSL government liquidated more than 600 military units in east Poland so that no 1 could think of breaking the conditions of this peace and resisting the entering Red Army troops. This is why the strategical assumptions of this peace in the form of the “defensive” doctrine on the Vistula River were developed in 2011. This is why Bogdan Klich, who approved this doctrine, was appointed by Tusk as head of the Polish embassy in the USA. The manager, due to the fact that president Andrzej Duda did not agree to mine with the ambassador of the man who signed the partition paper of Poland. This is why, right now, after the Ukrainian-American talks were broken, the immunity of Mariusz Błaszczak was taken distant so that he could be charged and arrested for declassified and disclosing the price to be paid by Poland for signing the peace between the German European Union and Russia. It will be easier for Tusk to say that they have so determined the ruling Europe that it is little evil that he knew nothing. It's easier than admitting that you were active in these vile plans.

On February 28, 2025, he was to go to past as a trailer for peace in Ukraine. However, everything indicates that this day will be recorded on the darkest pages of modern history. With the first part of my comment on the ostentatious distance between Europe and the United States ruled by Donald Trump and Republicans, most readers will most likely agree. The second part, concerning the conditions of peace which Europe can agree to, can be taken by any people as discipline fiction, as a crazy scenario. I shall ask: if peace talks between Europe and Russia take place without the participation of the United States and specified a peace plan with the demarcation line on the Vistula will be proposed, who will argue it? Friedrich Merz? Emmanuel Macron? Keir Starmer? Pedro Sanchez? Ursula von der Leyen?

Who? delight name 1 last name.

Mr Bogdan

****