Marcin Bogdan: Artificial intelligence or a sly beast?

Many people who are consumed by Christmas, who spend time in the family, distant from politics, most likely do not know that the court has been adjourned. Those who have heard of this may not know the reason for the postponement. The Court of First Instance justified the postponement of the sitting by stating that ‘did not get all the materials from investigators”. The court did not receive all the materials, but as the prosecutor Piotr Wozniak argued, in his opinion the materials not made available to the court by the prosecution “were not applicable to the result of the case’. Prosecutor Wozniak's judgments, not judgments, after all, Wozniak is simply a prosecutor and not a judge, should be taken seriously. After all, D.A. Wozniak gave religion to a witness who recognized the murderer in the chimney after “A deadly lookIt’s okay. ” Can these eyes lie? I don't think so, which is why D.A. Wozniak accused an innocent man who spent respective years in prison as a consequence of this prosecution.

Now the mark of Prosecutor Wozniak is Zbigniew Ziobro. More specifically, the mark is to arrest Zbigniew Ziobry. So why bother the court with materials that were “not applicable to the result of the case”? The problem is that the defence found that these materials, classified before the court by Prosecutor Wozniak, attest to the innocence of Zbigniew Ziobra. As a result, the defence announced that the request for the exclusion of Prosecutor Wozniak from the case was made, due to the fact that according to her there are "reasonable doubts" about his impartiality. The case turned out so hard that Wozniak himself yet admitted that “It was a mistake.” on his part due to the fact that “The court should have an insight into everythingIt’s okay. ” This information was even provided by TVN24, and could so be considered, regardless of whether it was an mistake of the prosecutor or a deliberate action to harm the accused, that the case was clarified and the reason for the postponement of the court’s detention proceeding for Zbigniew Ziobra known to the public.

Then why am I writing about it? due to the fact that more and more people are looking for information and answers to the various questions they ask, they mention to “knowledge” and “opinion” of artificial intelligence. So I looked into what he knew about the case and how artificial intelligence explained it:

‘The court adjourned its sitting on the application of provisional detention to Zbigniew Ziobry until mid-January 2026, as the defence was to present additional, valid documents, which was an crucial reason for postponement, in accordance with the rules on judicial proceedings.

• Reason for postponement: The defence needed time to deliver crucial documents, which prevented the sitting from continuing at the first date."

What is intelligence? The definition of intelligence is "ability to perceive, analyse and adapt to changes in the environmentIt’s okay. ” So, did artificial intelligence adapt to changes in the environment that resulted from Tusk’s government? Is it artificial intelligence or a sly beast? Fear of fear. It is not known whether prosecutors specified as Piotr Wozniak or more of a planet shaped by specified artificial intelligence.

Mr Bogdan