Marcin Bogdan: Exit or escape ?

How harmful and morally damaging this judgement of the European Court of Justice has been and has been written many times. I'm not going to repeat myself or quote these alarming comments here. Comments that clearly show that the European Union does not have the right to interfere with associate States' government in this regard. Matters relating to marriage, household and civilian rights in these areas fall within the exclusive competence of the associate States. Article 9 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights states that "The right to marry and the right to start a household are guaranteed in accordance with national law governing the exercise of those rightsIt’s okay. ” Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights makes it clear that "Men and women they are entitled to marry and start a household in accordance with national laws governing the exercise of that rightIt’s okay. ” It can so be said colloquially that this is not how we agreed to sign the Treaty of Accession and accession to the EU.

And that's what's most scary about it. The EU roller implements a post-Soviet evaluator. Urawnilovka is “primitively understood, frequently unjustified, equal treatment of all people or institutions within a peculiar groupIt’s okay. ” Yet all country, all nation has its tradition, its conditions, its regulations and its own legislation. In this context, let us look at the limits of acceptable blood alcohol erstwhile driving in different EU countries. If individual thought that, in specified a way it would seem fundamental to road safety, these limits are equal, they will be shocked. In Poland, the limit is 0.2 promila (promil is simply a gram of alcohol per litre of blood), as in Sweden or Estonia. In the Czech Republic, Hungary or Romania, this is an absolute 0 promili. But in countries specified as Germany, France, Austria, Spain and Italy, this limit is 0.5! Will the Court of Justice of the European Union decide that Poland is obliged to respect drunk drivers from France, Germany and Spain, within the meaning of Polish law, on our roads?for the implementation of rights of free movement”? Ridiculous? But it truly is the same mechanics for exercising rights from 1 associate State to another. The same mechanics as for a ruling on the request to recognise same-sex marriages.

Where is the limit of absurdity that will halt EU officials from interfering illegally with the interior affairs of individual associate States, including Poland? We can say that we are inactive fortunate that Britain has made a brexit and left the EU. In the United Kingdom, England, Wales and Northern Ireland, as in Malta and Liechtenstein, the blood alcohol limit for driving is 0.8 ÷! It is not hard to imagine that a mindless EU authoritative could order compliance on Polish roads with drunks, I stress, in the sense of the laws in force in Poland, British drivers. Or possibly even a politically correct authoritative would have had the thought that British drivers on the roads of another associate States, including Poland, could decision on the left? individual has late said that, if the European Union imposes left-hand traffic on Polish roads, it will surely do so gradually, with a transitional period. For the first year left-hand traffic will only be mandatory for trucks.

What a fewer years ago we could consider an unreal, impossible, a joke, now becomes a reality, a real threat. Britain made a brexit a fewer years ago. Is this the way it creates sound legislation? This is simply a separate subject, but no 1 in Britain imposes outside regulations overriding national law. Should Poland so make a polexit? During the “Forum Direction Polska” held late in Łomianki close Warsaw, well-known publicist Rafał Ziemkiewicz said that it is besides late for Poland to leave the European Union. Now, in the face of the madness that consumes the Union, polescape, or escape, is necessary. alternatively of working together in the common market, which was at the heart of the European Union, we have forced sick ideologies and pathological solutions. There is simply a rape against the sovereignty and self-determination of associate States, including Poland.

Did Poles scope the polexit? Do they feel the request for a Polescape? Not yet, I guess. If not, then it is essential to save Poland by opposing the European Union. The Polish government must powerfully reject specified case-law and regulations as the work to recognise same-sex marriages concluded in another EU countries. If the Union punishes us for this by refusing to pay the funds due to us, then the Polish government should deduct these amounts from contributions paid to the EU budget. Then we will not only have the Union's problem with what to do in specified a situation. It's possible. But there's 1 condition. This must be done by the Polish government. If individual did not realize what I mean, I will compose more clearly so that we must have the Polish government.

So possibly we can get our neighbors, our friends, our alliance, our compromise over divisions. It will stay Poland in the European Union in exchange for the establishment of a Polish government which will reconstruct the European Union to the right track in defence of Polish interests, defending the interests of the associate States.

You mean a fair offer?

Mr Bogdan