Marcin Bogdan: wellness education - last bell

The question of what is truly to be this subject has already been thoroughly examined and discussed by experts and experts. Each parent had time and moral work to read these opinions. I, in summary, will mention any of the main arguments presented by parents who, however, decided to send their children to wellness education classes. There is simply a group of parents who see the advantages contained in the title of the subject, in the promotion of widely understood health, but they do not see the issue of sexualization, and this in the destructive sex approach recorded in the programming basis of the object. There is simply a group of parents who believe that in the school where their children go, wellness education classes will be taught by a well-known and “trusted” teacher who will choose only acceptable issues from the curriculum and those controversial, specified as the concept of cultural sex, will reject or ignore. Sobriety occurs erstwhile parents learn, as late in 1 of the advanced schools in Warsaw, that the school wants to employment sexual deviants. But there is besides a group of people who want to send their children to classes in wellness education with full awareness. As 1 woman argued, she wants individual in primary school to teach her granddaughter what "bad touch" is. Unfortunately, she does not realize what she is condemning her granddaughter to, after all, in order to realize what "bad touch" is, 1 must know what "good touch" is. After all, evil is recognized only as the other of good. Distinguishing, recognizing evil cannot take place in a vacuum, must be a mention point.

To all those who share any of the arguments cited above and have not decided to discharge children from the subject of wellness education, I propose to read any quotes from the interview published on Onet. Interview conducted by Newsweek with, as stated, sex addict and sex educator. Interestingly, even liberal and politically correct text editors emphasize the word educator in red, as an error. But that didn't bother Newsweek to call the subject a wellness education specialist. At the very beginning, the “educator” stated that due to the basis of the programme subject, wellness education “Marriage ceases to be the only background to talk about sexuality”. As she explains to young children what sex is, the “educator” replied: “I'm saying it's close to 2 people erstwhile people get closer physically. Most frequently it looks like a penis in the erection state slides into a woman's vagina.” The question of how children receive specified explanations is answered by the ‘educator’: ‘Of course there's laughter in sex education. Especially in junior simple school. Fifth, sixth class — then they begin to respond more wisely, and seventh, and eighth — they begin to respond rather seriously. That penis isn't that comic anymore. They ask: What does it mean to have oral sex? More often: What does it mean to give individual a blow job?’

Yes, the second or 3rd grade of primary school is just laughter, but the older classes are rather serious, as shown by the dialog with children quoted by the "educator": "How, ma'am, is that orgasm going on with you? Then I appeal to the contract I was talking about at the beginning — that I am not talking about my individual experiences in class. We can talk about orgasm, but not about my personal.” Yes, it's very pedagogical, the "educator" tells children what and how, but does not talk about her individual experiences. Children in school are not told, but Newsweek’s readers can tell what the next quote says: “We talked erstwhile about changes in the body and the fact that at any point hair grows. A teenager approaches the board and says, "Mrs. Olu, due to the fact that I've grown this 1 hair on my chest and I don't know if it's normal, can I show you?" And he starts taking his shirt off. I said right away, don't take that shirt off. But I was laughing so hard, I couldn't get back on the subject.It’s okay. ” But in spite of these experiences, the “educator” of the woman Ola seems to have returned to the subject due to the fact that she continues: “I bring condoms to class, take out watch, sometimes blow”.

Your educator explains how crucial this subject is to wellness education. Regrettably, the erstwhile school “too much focus on the brain and skips the body." From an interview published by Onet, you can see that after the introduction of the subject of wellness education, the school will start to focus clearly on the body and the brain will alternatively skip. However, your educator deplores that parents compose out wellness education to their children in the class and put the thesis on why this happens: “And if they are harmed by a parent or guardian, will he deliberately block their participation in voluntary activities?".

This is the last bell to discharge a kid from the subject of wellness education. It's the last bell to prevent a situation where seeing your child, seeing your kid take off your shirt or shirt, any woman educator or your educator will find it hard to get back to the subject. But then it'll be hard for you to get a kid out of this class. No, it won't be hard, it'll be impossible. Now it's the last bell.

Mr Bogdan

***