Marcin Bogdan: April 10 - 15 years after

Faith, as defined in Wikipedia, is “giving a advanced probability of the veracity of the claim under conditions of deficiency of adequate knowledgeIt’s okay. ” But religion cannot be irrational, can not contradict facts, even as these facts are not adequate proof. religion cannot reject logic or “principles of correct reasoningIt’s okay. ” religion must be logical. Thus, it can be believed that the poisonous liquid in the glass is simply a healthy energy drink. But it is impossible to believe that a field stone on the most beautiful 1 is simply a nutritious bread.

Over the last 15 years, 2 narratives, a disaster communicative and an assassination communicative dominated media space. The origin of the disaster can be human errors, the origin of the assassination is conscious of the actions of the perpetrators. Both of these issues go beyond method considerations and fall within the remit of the prosecution and the court. investigation and method considerations are the domain of experts and scientists operating in peculiar committees and investigation groups. Therefore, this kind of investigation and analysis focuses on direct, method causes of plane crash. In the event of a crash, we are talking about a plane collision with an obstacle, in this case with birch and then with the ground. In the case of an assassination, we're talking about external interference, in this case, an explosion, an explosion. Independent commissions and investigation groups looking for sources and causes of the detonation besides analyzed whether the crash of the aircraft, the scale of its defragmentation, and the injuries of the victims could have been due to the plane's collision with the birch and then to the ground. Unfortunately, a government committee, focusing on aspects of the plane's collision with birch, did not mention in any substantive way to indications of an explosion, calling only the sect of those who pointed to the detonation as the origin of the plane's crash and the death of passengers.

As a consequence of the vast amount of work, specialized investigation and analysis of many prominent, including abroad experts and experts, and as a consequence of the negligence and nonchalance of the members of the government committee, today, after 15 years of tragedy, the question whether you believe that this was an assassination was replaced by the question of whether you believe it was a simple disaster. You have the right to believe, but your religion must face mostly known and available facts. If you believe it was just a disaster, you request to answer any fundamental questions:

• How could many large and dense parts of the aircraft have fallen to the ground even before the expected collision with the birch and subsequent collision with the ground? How did they fly backwards in the other direction? Did it happen to you, for erstwhile in your life, that during the braking of a tram or bus, there was a force that pushed you towards the rear of the vehicle, other its direction of motion?
• How is it that the bodies of the victims were completely stripped of clothing? The plane just before landing, just before it hits the ground, has a velocity of about 200, a maximum of 200 1000 kilometres per hour. In the road accident in which the erstwhile president of the Margaret Gersdorf ultimate Court participated, the rider was driving, as determined by the experts, at a velocity of 191 to 215 km/h. Did you hear the air rush rip him off his suit and clothing? Have you always heard of the bodies of the victims of an airplane crashing while landing on the ground being stripped of their clothing?
• How is it possible that the fuselage of the plane after an alleged impact on the ground was torn along the axis alternatively than burst transversely? These are the basic laws of physics. Head of discipline in Gazeta Wyborcza (yes in GW!) physicist Dr. Piotr Cieśliński wrote in an article from June 30, 2015: "Boiled sausages always break along, not across. due to the fact that they are shaped like a roller, and the tension in the wall along the axis of the cylinder is twice as tiny as the January to circuit. And so did the boilers of the first fewer particles on the Mississippi.It’s okay. ” Did you happen to hit an obstacle with an object shaped like a waltz, a tube, a stick, a sausage, so that the object would crack along the axis alternatively than across? Did you hear a roller-shaped object torn apart by advanced interior force burst across and not along the axis?
• How is it possible that the doors that were torn from the hull entered the ground to a depth of more than 1 metre erstwhile they broke off from the plane hitting the ground at about 200 km/h? Have you always seen parts of a racing car or a racing car that falls into an accident at a velocity of more than 200 km/h penetrate deep into the ground or an obstacle?

akin questions can be asked tens or even hundreds. I'm not bringing them here. The answer to any of them may require deeper method cognition and knowing of the laws of mechanics. But the 4 questions put above are elementary, at the level of cognition derived from primary or secondary school. You don't request doctorates, habilitations, even completed studies to answer that. Unfortunately, self-thinking is not trendy these days. Especially now, in an age of artificial intelligence, which can be asked anything to rapidly get a reliable and credible answer. If so, since it is 2025, 15 years after, let's ask artificial intelligence:

Question: Is it possible to detach the wings of the plane Tupolev TU-154 at a distance of 4.5 m from the wing tip due to an impact of the wing into a birch with a diameter of 30 cm?

Answer AI: Theoretically: If the birch hit a peculiarly weak point in the wing (e.g. the place of connection of the hull to the girder), it could origin local damage. However, the complete detachment of the wing's parts, especially at a distance of 4.5 m from the end, would require a force much greater than that which the birch could make on impact. Practically: In the scenario, the actual tearing of the full wing by birch with a diameter of 30 cm is extremely unlikely. Deformation, hull harm or another insignificant failures could occur, but breaking and tearing the wings at this distance would be almost impossible without additional factors specified as weakened structure or earlier damage.

Question: Is it possible that concurrent, in a chaotic way, a 30 cm diameter birch broke off and the wing of the plane ripped off at a distance of 4.5 m from its end?

Answer AI: The script, in which both the 30 cm diameter birch is broken in a chaotic way, and the wing of the aircraft is completely 4.5 m from its end, is improbable for respective reasons related to the physics of impact and the structure of the aircraft.

Modern artificial intelligence not only answers the questions asked, but besides can analyse pictures. So let's ask artificial intelligence to analyse Donald Tusk's celebrated photograph of Vladimir Putin. Photographs taken on April 10th in the evening, in the wreckage, right next to the place where the Body of the president of Poland was lying in the mud and massacred Bodies of another victims:

Answer AI:

Left figure (with profile, tilted)

• Gest: A clenched fist, directed towards another person, can propose a friendly or symbolic motion (e.g. congratulations, witty rivalry)
  • Facial expression: A somewhat tilted head and a gentle grin can show affirmative emotions, specified as satisfaction, sympathy or kindness.

Right figure (front)

• Facial expression: Neutral or somewhat thoughtful, with a subtle smile. It may propose restraint, interest or judgment.
  • Attitude: Straightened figure and calm expression indicate control and control.

Generally, it can be assumed that the scene depicts a loose, non-compulsive conversation with a affirmative attitude or witty motion exchange.

Are you fascinated by artificial intelligence? You ask her things? Is he helping you? And you inactive believe it was just a disaster? If so, usage your intelligence and answer 1 more question. If this was just a disaster, why would an hr of plane crash be rigged? Why was the time of the disaster delayed by 16 minutes, stating that it happened at 8:56 Polish time? Why would Donald Tusk say that anyone who challenges this hr is spreading conspiracy theories? After 3 weeks, day by day, without any explanation, why did it start to say that the crash happened at 8:41 p.m.? Why did an investigator from the government committee say that the given 8:56 was "more symbolic than authentic”?

You inactive believe it was just a disaster? Is your religion authentic or more symbolic?

Mr Bogdan