
Such an overarching thought tends to guide the right-wing governments, little frequently left-wing and more liberal. In Poland, it was adequate that the Government of the United Right ended VAT carousels and the slogan "The money is gone and there will be no” became obsolete, at least until the left-wing liberals regained power. In the United States, the Republican, and thus the right-wing president, Donald Trump, immediately after taking office, established the Department of State Efficiency (DOGE). It was headed by businessman Elon Musk. As early as the first weeks, Musk discovered that large amounts of money were extorted from the social benefit strategy (American equivalent of ZUS). The benefits were paid to persons over 150 years old, up to 200 years old, and the oldest individual to whom benefits were paid was 361 years old. Left-wing media immediately raised the rhetes that Musk did not give the numbers or exact amounts. To prove that this information was solely a political attack by Republicans on God's spirit of guilty Democrats, left-wing media published data from an audit conducted in 2024 in the Social safety Administration. On the basis of these figures, it was declared triumphantly that the US benefit strategy was tight, as between 2015 and 2022, out of the overall benefit scale of $8.6 trillion, only 0.84% of payments were undue, defrauded. Only that these only 0.84% benefits are a large amount of $72 billion. That's what's been defrauded. What was the mechanics of these extortions? Each American citizen has a Social safety Number (SNN). This data is collected in the Numident database. Turns out there's a deficiency of death data in this database. The welfare strategy recognises that if there is no death certificate, then man is alive. And since he's alive, he's entitled to a benefit. Even if he turned 361.
Does that remind you of anything? The identical mechanics was utilized in extorting Warsaw's tenement houses for the presidency of Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz. In the absence of a death certificate, the owner of a tenement or real property was admitted, just like in the United States, that if there is no death certificate, that means that a man is alive, no substance how old he must be. On the basis of this presumption, a curator was established who could manage the property. specified a curator, representing a fewer 100 and 10 years old, frequently obtained from Warsaw City Hall the return of a tenement home or game as part of the alleged reprivatization. Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz signed without embarrassment the acts of returning the tenements to curators representing persons 110, 115 or 120 years old. According to the origin data available on the Internet, the oldest individual to regain a tenement in Warsaw was 128 years old. Only 128 years old. In this context, the words of the song by Jan Kaczmark and Marcin Wolski come to mind:
There was a hut, glass in the hut
♪ And the paws were all going ♪
What yours was, almost mine
And abruptly he whispers, "No, I'm scared."
No death certificate to prove the individual is alive. Even if she was 500. How simple, how insolent and effective. And here in Poland, and overseas, on another continent. It would seem that they are 2 different worlds but the same method. To apply it, just combine left-wing sensitivity with liberal democracy. But you gotta admit the Americans were braver. The payment of social benefits to a individual aged 361 is impressive. I can hear the chorus of Jan Kaczmark and Marcin Wolski's song in my ears, which is most likely the chorus of colleagues from PO sang Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz in the halls of Warsaw City Hall:
What are you afraid of, stupid?
Why don't you want to go all the way?
Sometimes it's worth a good fall
That was so close.
What are you afraid of, stupid?
It's so human.
That shame so abruptly escape
Don't be specified a fool!
She lacked courage, Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz in her rivalry with Joe Biden suffered a terrible defeat. 128 : 361 is an age gap. It's a knockout. Why didn't she want to go all the way? It was so close and everything would have gone away. There's nothing left. And Tusk wouldn't gotta introduce a fighting democracy now. There'd be nothing left to fight for. Oh, yeah, they're the ones who don't have adequate and we hope so.
Mr Bogdan
If you are curious in having a book, delight make a voluntary payment to the statutory objectives of the Solidarni2010 Association and send information to the address == sync, corrected by elderman ==
Here's the account number:
67 2490 0005 0000 4520 4582 2486
The book was published by the efforts and means of members of the 2010 Solidarity Association as part of statutory activities.