That was a long time ago. So long ago, I can't even remember precisely erstwhile – surely I was a very young man – but I remember well how I felt erstwhile I first listened to the communicative of a converted villain with understanding: that this is most likely the most crucial communicative I've heard in my life, due to the fact that it shows that there is no sin that – if I regret sincerely – could not be redeemed. And there's no fall that can't be made. I realized that if even the villain who regretted his misdeeds only moments before he died – but God, who knows the heart of all man, knew that he had done it sincerely – then what chance do we all have, who inactive have the gift of time – any more, others less, but still. In another words, I realized that even if life to date is not a reason for pride, but alternatively a band of mistakes, we always have a chance to find good and meaningful in it – as long as we live.
This long introduction I wrote to explain that I have no right to take distant any chance of conversion (for who of us is without sin? – surely not me!), and yet despite everything I wrote above I have this conviction, there are people from whom I would never buy a car. Like Sylvester Latkowski. I will skip the full gangster communicative of the unfortunate – there was no story, not just any gangster! – which has late outraged so much the alleged "right-wing media" that even the cover was devoted to it (quote: "the erstwhile gangster is present the editor-in-chief of the influential weekly). This was until it turned out that Latkowski had changed sides again: (for the first PiS he supported the PiS, during the regulation of the PO assured that the PiS persecuted him and adored Komorowski to support the Second PiS again) and could be useful. I will not compose about my individual relation with a man about the rattlesnake's mentality, to whom he asked before walking to the prosecutor's office (previously in the editorial board of Life), as he assured me of "the confession of life", and I, of naivety, believed) and during it I helped out of my heart as much as I could, for which he “thanked” (as the rattlesnake just did) – not about me. The thing is, erstwhile I watched Latkowski's fresh films again, I realized that there are people whose passing time does not change, and the methods of action change as much as physical abuse over people differs from destroying their camera's eye, or if manipulating 1 naive writer differs from manipulating the public. In another words, tools and scope can change, but the nerve and cynicism stay unchanged. The movie about Amber Gold, in which Sylwester Latkowski utilized a diagram from our book "Discourse" showing the frequency of contacts between people from the "Gdańsk System", but utilized in specified a cynical way to "eliminate" from this puzzle – created in the interior safety Agency in 2017, and thus during the word of the Law and Justice, not the PO! “Jack Kurski was just another confirmation of a sad record: that for smart guys who usage media and specified as Latkowski we are manipulating the goal justifies the means and only matters what is applicable – and not only about Amber Gold.
But that's a communicative for another story...
Wojciech Sumliński
ABW MATERIALS PUBLISHED IN THE BOOK OF THE ‘COMPANY’:
