‘Macrons’ case contra Owens” is not only an unprecedented trial and a fully-ready thought for a genre movie Political fiction. This, according to Xavier Poussard, is the author of the planet bestseller "Becoming Brigitte, a "king hole" leading – according to the Owens series of claims – to the very "nuclear of darkness".
‘Complaint’, Case No. N25C-07-194 CL
With respect to the content of the French presidential couple's suit against Candace Owens, an American conservative activist and web author of podcasts, as a comment comes the title of Lewis Carroll's fresh "Alice in Wonderland": "My God, how unusual everything is today. And yesterday, life was completely normal.” In a fresh submission to the ultimate Court of Delaware (USA), we read that the suspect stated publically in March 2024, placing the full professional reputation at stake, that the First woman of France was actually a man.
"Since then, as the suit says, Owens has utilized this false message to advance her independent platform, gain publicity and gain money." The female was besides to ignore any credible evidence disproving her claims, disseminating the thesis of “known conspiracy theorists and slanderers who were proven to be lying.” "Instead of taking action by the president and Mrs. Macron to explain the substance – we read further – Owens ridiculed them and utilized them as an additional feed for her crowd of crazy fans".
In addition, according to the letter of the document, the suspect not only did not respond to the presidential claim made by the couple to correct these claims, but in retaliation for the "suddenness" of Macron's demands she led an eight-part podcast entitled "Becoming Brigitte", while publishing posts on the "X" platform. The thesis contained in the “Series” reproduced – according to the letter – verified lies about the Macrons. "These improbable, slanderous and far-fetched fictions included, among another things, claims that Mrs. Macron was born as a man, stole the identity of another individual and changed gender, becoming Brigitte; Mrs. Macron and president Macron are relatives of incest; president Macron was elected president of France as part of the CIA's MKultra program or akin head control program; and that Ms. Macron and president Macron commit fraud, fraud and abuse of power to conceal these secrets."
In consequence to the Macron claim for libel, Owens publically refused to retreat her claims, calling the actions of the French presidential couple a strategy public relations. At the start of a YouTube live commentary, Owens recalled a video from the movie “Gladiator”, in which a character played by Russell Crowe shouts, “Are you not having fun?” "That's why you're here," said the podcaster to her audience. “This is how I feel now. present I receive my documents.”
To an uninformed receiver, this dispute seems as ridiculous as it is ridiculous. It's like more of a network thing. fake news Or crazy conspiracy theories. It is hard to realize why the head of the European atomic power should be afraid with the unfounded accusations of the American influencer, whose professional authority was challenged by a squad of lawyers representing Macron, writing in a suit that she "built a brand on provocation, not on truth." More in-depth wonders how the French side will prove in court that the American female acted with the intention of damaging the image of the presidential couple, knowingly and intentionally spreading false information. In addition, they will gotta show that Owens was profiting from this, acting with full awareness of their harm.
Anyone who knows a small bit about the laws of American law on defamation will start by asking why the most crucial residents of the Elysée Palace decided to mention the case to a abroad court, since Owens' claims are “apparently false”, as the procedural paper informs us. uncertainty in this respect increases the hard legal request for the complainants to prove that Owens deliberately spread lies.
It may be helpful to re-examine the content of the suit. The characteristic feature of this paper is alternatively customized content. The French side devotes quite a few area in it to discuss things that are irrelevant from the point of view of the applicants. A standard letter shall usually state the name of the persons, the place of residence and a brief description of their relation with the case. The Macron complaint, on the another hand, states a alternatively detailed mention to the individual life and professional career of French marriage. For example, we learn that from early years, Emmanuel Macron “showed his intellectual curiosity and emotional sensitivity, mostly nurtured by a close relation with his mother’s grandma Manette, a teacher who introduced him to literature and progressive political ideals." In another place, we read that "President Macron came to power in France, embodying the modern, dynamic image of a leader who finds a reflection among many citizens."
These phrases are simply an example of the opinions contained in the letter. We will find more akin “flavours” by following a 219-page document. Interestingly, they seem to be the key to knowing the intentions of the plaintiffs. The written communicative has a clear political context. It is hard not to see the French side trying to force the content into the media. This is spoken by a more structured love communicative of French matrimony for the greater public than by a lawsuit. The way the suspect was presented will besides be crucial in this context. From a note on Owens' past activity, the image of a mistaken person, spreading the most bizarre “conspiracy theories”, “taking inspiration from making scandalous statements, presenting a shock and an increase in the number of people observing the fact or liable discourses”.
The seriousness of the American undercaster further discredits the claims in the letter that she knew that the statements she distributed were false. In the light of the information presented in the application, the French organization confronted a female with factual evidence contained in the alleged December Withdrawal Request, in order to refute her colporteured thesis. The point is that Owens questioned their evidentiary value, claiming that the First woman of France was not presented in actual material Brigitte, and the Elysée Palace did not want to dispel her doubts and refused an interview before the American female published the "Seria".
Brigitte Macrone contra Natachy Rey and Delphine Jégouse
It's hard to realize clue cases without a fewer names. Simplifyingly, 2 French women “written” the introduction to this curiosity story. When, in December 2021, calling herself a “independent self-government journalist”, Natach Rey gave an interview featuring Delphine Jégousse as “the fairy/medium” alias Amanda Roy, no 1 expected the main thesis presented in it to be considered seriously in court outside the Atlantic. During a four-hour conversation, Rey argued that Brigitte Macron (née Trogneux)'s wife was born a boy named Jean Michel, who was later scheduled to undergo a sex shift surgery and take Brigitte's name. Rey further claimed that Brigitte's household photographs never existed, and papers confirming her existence could have been fabricated. The interviewer called the full thing a "state lie" and the President-in-Office a "marion".
The consequence of the network users did not take long. Both the conversation on the YouTube channel Amanda Roy and the hashtag #JeanMichelTrogneux on the then Twitter began to conquer the Internet. The first citizen of the French Republic took the level in the case, declaring that specified information is the worst form of false news. Brigitte Macron's reaction to the media turmoil was to file a suit for defamation against authors circulating on the viral web of reports. In September 2024, the Paris Criminal Court found Natasha Rey and Amanda Roy guilty of defamation of the First Lady. Women were fined and compensation was imposed: EUR 8,000 for Brigitte and EUR 5,000 for her brother, Jean Michel Trogneux, who, like her sister, did not appear in the courtroom. The breakthrough in the legal conflict occurred on 10 July 2025 erstwhile the second instance court acquitted both ladies and overturned convictions. The Paris Court of Appeal ruled that most of the comments contained in the YouTube material were not defamatory due to the fact that they were either besides vague or did not violate the applicant's good name or due to the fact that the defendants acted in good faith, which is subject to the protection of freedom of speech. What is worth noting, the court has never made a clear message on the veracity of the charges.
A dispute over freedom of speech or a dispute over truth?
After the July judgement of the Paris court, which, as noted, did not settle the substance as to the substance, although it had legal means to explain Natachy Rey's hypothesis, the public discourse lit up questions about the scope and limits of the protection of individuals' individual property and constitutional limits of freedom of expression. A dispute of value, emphasizing – and rightly so – the dramatic consequences for people of spreading unverified information about them, has over time evolved into a political conflict, in which the request to increase the control of the network's transmission was pushed. Meanwhile, a deeper thought on the themes of this communicative leads us to another question. Although freedom of speech is positive, it is not a origin of reason that would justify its rightfulness. It is right due to the fact that it leads to affirmative values. And 1 of the chief affirmative values is truth. It is hard to ask the fact and search it without freedom of speech. Why is it so crucial in this context?
To answer that question, let's go back to March 2024. It was then on the pages of the Algerian news channel that the text entitled "Marokian Machzen recruits Jacques Sapira for a crusade against Algeria". His author, Mohsen Abdelmoumen, expresses his disapproval of Sapira's actions, a French economist who spoke critically about Algeria in the Moroccan government journal. In 1 of the paragraphs of Abdelmoumen, he wrote: “Instead of introducing himself as Kremlin spokesperson and criticizing Algeria, it would be better for you to be curious in the delusions of his operetta president, who considers himself Louis XIV erstwhile he accepts Vladimir Putin in Versailles, or Napoleon Bonaparte erstwhile he declares war on the Russian president himself 7 years later. You'd better worry about your cocaine addict and your psychopathic president, who's under the influence of your own. wives Jean-Michel Trogneux, who governs France without being elected.”
The comments of the Algerian publicist should be looked at as regards the change of direction of the French policy on the territorial dispute over Western Sahara between Morocco and Algeria, which advocated the independency of the region. France's designation of Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara was, as the Algerian MFA put it, "a step which no another French government had previously taken". Macron's decision worsened relations with Algeria, a historically close partner of France. There was a question about the reason why the head of the French state submitted to the force of Morocco. any have seen this change in the context described by “Le Monde” reports that 1 of Macro's calls was included in the list of numbers chosen by Moroccan intelligence services for possible cyber espionage. It was about utilizing Israeli spyware Pegasus. It is so not only for the French that it is crucial to unravel the revelations made by Candace Owens because, if they are true, they exposure the leader of the European power to the danger of blackmailing abroad intelligence. But can the fact be established about specified an improbable matter?
"Becoming Brigitte"
One more name should be invoked in search of answers to this question. It can be said that the main perpetrator of the transatlantic legal conflict "Macrons contra Owens” is Xavier Poussard, author of the best-selling book "Becoming Brigitte". It was on the basis of the book by the French writer that the "Series" of the American undercast was created. In a February 2025 interview on the Owens channel, Poussard told of the scenes of a respective years of investigation, the function of Natchy Rey in identifying the alleged actual identity of the First Lady, as well as the difficulties faced by all who dealt with the subject.
To prove that the problem in determining certain facts in Brigitte's life was not only the researchers outside the media mainstream, the author of the popular book recalled the statements of Virginie Linhart and Sylvie Bommel, French journalists who, like him, “twisted the wall.” Linhart, discussing the author's movie "Un Roman français" on his wife's presidential life, said: "The people interviewed, but for her erstwhile students, had approval from the Elysée Palace and were very cautious in what they said. There's a very thick wall of silence here. The level of control and verification is simply astonishing. (...) (Film) is simply a very individual 90-minute portrait. To movie it, I needed photos of young Brigitte Macron, her childhood... showing the journey, not those approved by the Bestimage agency. Everything about her past is left out of silence. This is simply a complete blackout." Bommel, on the another hand, expressed her difficulty in uncovering material traces of André Louis Auzière, Brigitte’s ex-husband, saying: “It’s like being in 1 of the episodes Black Mirror, in which the president's offices found a way to penetrate the brains of his old friends to erase everything." Following Poussard's further discussion with Owens, we learn that the explanation of this mystery involved... entering the "king hole".
In the light of the book "Becoming Briggite", which was inactive updated hypotheses, born in April 1953, the real Brigitte Trogneux is simply a figure shown in authoritative photographs before 1986, it is in a 1954 household photo, a 1963 municipal photo, and a 1974 wedding photo, published in 2019 by the magazine "Le Point". However, the female portrayed in the photographs, according to Poussard's theory, is not a character declaring to be the First woman of France. The actual Brigitte died in the 1980s. Her brother, Jean Michel, was then to accept the identity of the deceased sister. Brigitte Macron is not a mother, but an aunt, alternatively an uncle, Sebastian, Laurence, and Tiphaine. So we have 2 Brigitte: the real 1 from the home of Trogneux and the false one, claiming to be Emmnuel Macron's wife. How is that possible?
Poussard's guess fills a gap in his reconstructed mysterious household history. It is simply a hypothesis that can explain the way Jean Michel became Brigitte, who “knowing that she is sentenced to severe illness, would entrust custody of the children and her identity to that brother with whom she was very close and who always felt like a woman.” No 1 would seriously consider Poussard's reports, and his "hero" would be the first to sue him for defamation, which he had never done if he had not examined existing photographs utilizing Chinese Face++ facial designation software, or "Face Plus". A crucial part of the book deals with comparisons between the children's portraits of Jean Michel and Brigitte Trogneux to the present Brigitte Macrone, which, according to analyses of "artificial intelligence", in the explanation of the journalist, are an argument in favour of the truthfulness of the findings of his investigation that the First woman of France is not who she claims to be.
Journalist speculation leads us indirectly to another, astonishing hypothesis. Born in 1982, Jean Jacques Trogneux, boy of Jean Michel, or supposedly present Brigitte, is strikingly akin to Emmanuel Macron. This almost duplicate feature was besides seen by participants of a street probe, available in YouTube material entitled "BRIGITTE ou JEAN MICHEL ? #STVALENTIN". As there are any gaps and inconsistencies in the French president's biography, as the author of the best-selling book “Becoming...” pointed out, 1 can presume – in view of all the claims contained in the book – that Macron and Jean Jacques Trogneux are related. Either as half brothers or as siblings. But that would mean Emmanuel Macron married... his father.
“On the another side of the mirror and what did Candace Owens find?”
At this point, the investigation of Poussard leading us indirectly to conclusions contrary to common sense should be rejected. On the another hand, the seriousness of Candace Owens’ approach to them is hard to understand. Of course, it can be as “Kot” said from Lewis Caroll's fresh mentioned at the beginning that: “they’re both mad” (both are crazy). It might as well be so, paraphrasing the words “Queen of Kier” from Caroll’s another work, “On the another side of the mirror and what Alice found,” that, by following the “Seria” Owens, “we can believe six impossible things before breakfast.”
Surely it will not be easy for us to escape the recurring motive of pedophile scandals with an incestuous background. From the carpet designer decorating the level of the office at the Elysée Palace – Claud Lévęque, through the book André Gide, shown on the presidential portrait, to 1 of Macron's top supporters on the French political scene – Olivier Duhamel. They all share the same sexual preference for children. According to Owens, pedophile at the beginning, Macron and his wife's relation is simply part of a wider strategy of deception involving a network of elite perverts. besides under the microscope was the President-in-Office, and especially his fast political promotion, which, according to American claims, was artificially created by powerful elites, including the Rothschild banker family, despite the deficiency of references.
We besides learn from the podcast that in the corridors of the Elysée Palace, people could be seen in France as “types from a dark star”, specified as Alexandre Benalla or “Mimi” Marchand. The latter, by the way, referred to over the Seine as "the celebrity paper", has for years created and closely supervised the media image of the presidential couple. erstwhile her corrupt swindle came to light, the door to the Paris mansion closed from the inside. In retaliation for the disloyalty of the Macrons, “Mimi” was indirectly to uncover that Brigitte had undergone surgery in 2019 with a doctor known for feminizing facial surgery in transgenders.
The "King hole," as Xavier Poussard utilized to say, falls abruptly down, leading anyone who dares to enter it, to the "nuclear of darkness." This would kind of explain Marcon's admiration for the blasphemous beginning Ceremony of the 2024 Olympics, after which Paris required not only acts of expiation but besides exorcism. Nor can we overlook the impression that the French President's decision to enter the right to abortion in the Constitution was an act inspired by the spirit of darkness, directed at the Giver of Life himself.
It's interesting that so far the French First woman has not submitted to a test to find the sex chromosome system. Their consequence could put an end to all the speculations already in existence. However, there are besides many question marks for this evidence to convince everyone. Trying to solve this mystery remains to follow the destiny of the case before the American court, following the fact wherever it leads. Many points to the constant request to face the temptation that 1 of the protagonists of the legendary work of the Brothers, and now the Sisters, Wachowskie, said: “I would like to wake up and forget all about the Matrix. I want to return to the illusion due to the fact that the fact is besides painful.”
Anna Nowogrodzka-Patryarcha
