The title is simply a small provocative, considering that the current Polish state exists and is doing well (whatever it means). Offices work, police and courts also, education is limping but someway functioning, and public investment is progressing. In authoritative media we hear about good macroeconomic results, about growth, about the large economical possible of Poland, about the designation we enjoy in the world. Everything seems to be fine with the present Magdalenk-circular Poland, but looking at the quite, "hot" shuffle on the global stage, which is simply a symptom of many wars and in Europe and beyond, the economical slowdowns caused by these wars, I think that... III of Poland in the current state will not survive. To prove this, I will only give 2 serious arguments, which describe the weakness of the socio-political strategy in which we live, the weakness which is the consequence of a structure called the 3rd Republic. Thus, the Polish State in the current configuration is simply a product for which the warrant has already expired. Further usage is not recommended – as the subtitles sometimes say on any products.
One of the reasons for the current crisis is the fact that the 3rd Republic of Poland was created as a plan of abroad services (west, globalists, etc.). It is simply a state which was organized on the basis of the "soggy" PRL, i.e. the earlier russian Union project. The "real socialism" task actually came to an end in the early 1980s, erstwhile the end of the Yalta order was decided after the martial law. specified an authoritative expression of the changes was the announcement of a pierestroika in the russian Union and Gorbachev's gathering with Reagan (Geneva, Reykjavik, Washington), and General W. Jaruzelski at a gathering with D. Rockefeller learned about Poland's upcoming fate, which was the aftermath of what was planned in the globalistic and financial circles of the world.
Poland was not a coincidence after ’89, it did not appear from anything, it did not regain its independency either peacefully or as a consequence of an armed effort but changed its protector. (I believe that the Polish People's Republic was a Polish country. We just didn't have another state). Of course, Polish society must have received any ,,optimistic’ signals, how pleasantly suited to our mentality, the kind of underground structure of Solidarity (Underground State?), conversations between Wałęsa and PRL officials, ,, circular table”, elections ,,June’, access to the media. Actually, it's a breath of freedom that's already covered the seeds of another enslavement due to the fact that it was controlled from the outside. It was the beginning of this task called the 3rd Republic, in which I survived my full adult life and, I hope, I will live to see its end. Everything suggests that I have a good chance of that happening. I draw my optimism from the fact that those who took over Poland in the 1980s and carefully planned it (no, it was not sloppy, a series of mistakes or the inability to act), are themselves in a immense crisis. Apparently, globalisation has already entered a phase that is already followed by only the closure of the system, which turns into chaotic abandonment of its assets. There was a crisis of 2008, a erstwhile pandemic, there is simply a war in Ukraine, a war with Iran, alleged green order, omnipresent censorship. As a result, the full global plan begins to spread simply, and with it the task of III of Poland loses its protector.
And the second argument behind the fall of the 3rd Polish Republic is fundamentally its rotten state structures, it's a immense corruption, immense debt, bureaucracy that surpasses importantly the times before ’89. Finally, it is chaos in the judiciary, which results in the deficiency of religion of Poles in the legal system, the failing wellness care, education, which results in «debilization” (a word popularized by Mr B. Kopczyński) of children and young people. A skilled eye of the observer-amator but political ,,professional” notes that the III of Poland is not suitable for any repair. any people have the illusion that there is simply a anticipation of gradual change by parliamentary means: to change the law so that, 1 by one, all area of our country is streamlined and acts in the service of citizens. That's what the Confederate Mentzen and Bosak think. In my opinion, this is impossible due to the fact that the III of the Republic of Poland is simply a immense structure, composed of many (too many) elements which are coherent, folded in years into 1 structure (PRL plus III of the Republic of Poland) but in full origin very bad operation of the full system. all removal of even 1 component (amendment of the law) requires changes in a number of others. An example is the territorial division of the country. We presently have a three-stage territorial breakdown structure. There are municipalities, powiats, voivodships. We complain about central bureaucracy, but what happens in local administration is simply a kind of powerful parasite feeding on the body of provincial Poland. Will any insignificant changes improve the situation?
The III of Poland is not, of course, defenceless. It has respective million beneficiaries who find themselves in specified a rotten and poorly organized system. There are besides another countries that are curious in specified weak Poland. However, before our eyes we see further weakening of the protectors of the present Poland, and in addition the socio-economic situation will proceed to deteriorate and Poles will yet announcement that the responsibility is not numerous, errors and distortions" of the strategy but the badly planned construction of this round-the-clock state.
Jarosław Luma
