Some time ago, I pointed out that in politics we are besides attached to names. People, as we know, are competitive, especially in politics and should be treated as temporary actors of the political scene, or – referring to the automotive manufacture – as spare parts that can be successfully replaced with others.
I will decision to the Atlantic for a minute to give readers a clearer message on what I mean in this article. A good example is the final triumph in the United States presidential election Donald Trump. On this occasion a fresh word appeared: Trumpism. Trumpism is simply a group of views on the economy, politics, society, the state that, yes, Trump himself initiated, created a framework that was then filled by his colleagues, including J. D. Vance. 1 can even say that Trumpism is more crucial than Trump himself, and that the political camp around the president is uniform, determined, unchangeable and ideological adequate to be able to put forward another candidate for effective state management. How is 1 of the political commentators (which one???) said: opponents can kill Trump but it will not do them any good, due to the fact that the "turbo" Trumpist or D. J. Vance will come to power. And what's more, he's going to prosecute the same political line as the current president, only... more zealous. Well, possibly little media.
Trump without a solid political background means little, as his erstwhile word showed. Trump present can be calm due to the fact that Trumpism can be implemented and without it.
Can there be braunism without Braun? Maybe, a small by analogy. And why would specified thoughts come to head in the alleged MPs? From social media, from which 1 can learn what proverbial bear a favour any commentaries do to Mr. Braun. Dr Stanisław Krajski pointed out this issue in his recording, "Are Braun allowed to be criticized?". Indeed, any entries were, mildly writing, peculiar. I wondered if it was an issue of net trolls but as I look at the parties to the political conflict in Poland, I find that there are truly specified troubled people. It is very dangerous for the candidate himself, due to the fact that he ridicules him and does not make an atmosphere for constructive criticism, by which the candidate can sometimes "repair" and get off the incorrect political path. There is another issue that Dr. Krajski raised. Well, Poles lock themselves in hateful camps. No 1 can convince anyone anymore due to the fact that everyone knows everything and has the worst opinion of their opponents. So far, this state of affairs has been characterised only by political camps PIS and PO. They did so on purpose, thus closing the political scene for another 3rd and 4th political movements. It's a political strategy.
What should I do? Supporters of Mr Braun should work to build a larger camp with a immense political and business background, to clarify the political agenda (which they already have) and to call it braunism. The warrant for the implementation of this programme is undoubtedly Mr Braun himself, but, as I have already mentioned, Mr Braun is only human. Can't you imagine anyone else in his place? That's very bad. any Polish J. D. Vance would be useful.
It's over. all sensible Pole, guided by national interest, should appoint himself any kind of gradation of candidates in the upcoming presidential election. If I support Mr Braun, who will possibly be my second choice. most likely Mr Mentzen, which for any people is simply a shock, due to the fact that how can you... For starters, however, these 2 candidates should refrain from throwing mud at each another in order not to provoke their supporters. Elections will give any information about the strength and political importance of each candidate. I don't like the thought that if 1 of the candidates gets a mediocre score, then he should quit politics. Do we truly have an excess of political leaders?
After the election, somewhere during the holiday, you'll gotta sit down and communicate. Of course, for the sake of braunism and mentalism. Let us remember that candidates are interchangeable, and the national interest is inactive in the same place.
Jarosław Luma
