Diplomacy
I am very pleased that Mr. Thomas Rose will be the US Ambassador to Poland, as good as he is to almost 90 ambassadors from another countries, with the exception of those whose bosses are dictators, autocrats and tyrants. It is besides good to note His opinion on the presidential elections in Poland that "...the future of Polish-American relations remains in the hands of Poles and Polish government". However, he wonders the reasoning in the message preceding the above sentence, that "...the time is coming for the decision before the presidential election, whether Poland wants to get closer to the centre of the authorities in the European Union, which may in turn have negative implications for the main forces in the EU – Germany and France, or whether Poland wants to stay a proud, sovereign country that fulfils its alliance commitments".
How the neon turned on my proverb that your grace rides on a horse. I ask you, what can stand in the way of the alternative? The right-wing president, who can torpedo the activity of Poland in the Weimar Triangle, among others, by undermining her aspirations to join the main forces of the EU. Who wants to see Poland in the EU weak, in the function of Cinderella, as 1 of many sly links? He who sees the weak or does not want to see it at all. We stay arrogant not only of our dream membership of the EU, but besides of our slave membership of the Council of common economical Assistance (until 1991) under the auspices of the USSR.
Bearing in head the deficiency of sovereignty in the sphere of influence of the USSR, thanks to "the Franklin Delano Roosevelt arrangement (US President) with Stalin, who, according to Dr. Ewa Cytowska-Siegrist, had already donated to him in 1943 our east lands for his promise that the russian Union would join the future UN and start a war with Japan". We besides stay arrogant of fulfilling our allied obligations in NATO, remembering the irretrievable “expulsion” in 1993 from the Polish USSR troops, but besides the awareness of the historical neighbourhood with hell, which in the conquest of the lands of east Poland absorbed in Siberia (at the beginning of planet War II) from 320 1000 to 1.5 million people. The messengers were initiated in the late 16th century in relation to the prisoners of war of Stefan Bator with Moscow.
For 2 years (1939 – 1941 – called the first russian occupation) respective more Poles were sent to Siberia than in about 200 earlier years. This crime continued after January 1944, during the alleged second russian occupation. We have a work to take care of the future of Poland (also at election urns), and to join strong alliances, both military and political and economic, is simply a kind of Polish Declaration of Independence. Concerns about Poland's sovereignty have been dispelled, I hope, by the Constitutional Court of Poland in its November 2010 judgment, stating that: "... the co-shaping of decisions taken in the EU (in the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council of the EU, the European Commission) is compensating for any kind of limitation of the sovereignty of a state that is not irreversible, (...) states hold sovereignty due to the fact that their constitutions, which are expressions of state sovereignty, hold their meaning and affirm the primacy of the Nations to constitute their own destiny."
Will Mr Thomas Rose add a fewer words to a fewer sentences about post-election Poland about the behaviour of a associate of the fresh Washington administration of Mr Elon Musk? I am curious to receive his expected Roman salute and fuel the Germans to dissuade German work for war crimes and against humanity. erstwhile German alternate Co-Chairman Alexander Gauland said in 2018: "Germany can and should be arrogant of its soldiers fighting in both planet wars". Today, Mr. Elon Musk, blowing on the same trumpet, says that "Germany focuses besides much on past wines". Or what, or in the name of what, did the Poles and Israel deserve in the image of Nuremberg in specified a crooked mirror? Politics or rudeness? JANUSH G.
Scary comparisons, but...
Dear editor, dear Readers, are you not being imposed on a amazing likeness of situation, actions and characters? Who remembers what happened in European and global politics in 1933 and the announcements of the leader of a large European country about surviving space, about the final solution, about a thousand-year-old country...? However, almost everyone remembers what the Second planet War was, who caused it, how it justified the request to wrest the planet – due to the fact that that is what all reliable textbook of past on the basic level speaks about. Isn't president Trump's proposal or threat to Canada a repeat of Austria's Anszlus? Isn't president Trump's offer or threat to Denmark a repeat of the Anszlus of Czechoslovakia? Does the intention of taking over, reflecting, regaining the Panama Canal remind Poles of the effort to connect large Germany to east Prussia on the extraterritorial highway?
Let us besides mention that the 2 leaders I compare have been democratically elected, won a majority of the parliamentary-government, gained genuine support from their society for their intentions and actions. They both made plans, dreams and delusions. No 1 dared to argue it. They were likewise unanimously applauded during their public appearances. Like Hitler, after gaining power, Trump collectively pardoned his supporters having legal problems. akin rhetoric (The full planet against us!), the same demagoguery (American Gulf, Grossdeutschland), likewise pointed enemies (Mexicans, refugees, Jews), likewise unrealistic intentions and fantastic goals (Wunderwaffe – conquering Mars...). I'm a powerless old man. I'm powerless against what's happening around me.
Although it is apparent that all vote counts in the election, my only vote in the election will drown in a sea of propaganda and populism. I even have a fear among my friends to uncover what I think about national or European policy so as not to exposure myself to "patriotic" agitation and an effort to "conversion". I, the powerless old man, have not yet completely abandoned hope as a spark of religion in the triumph of good, reason, reason, so I am passing my remarks on to the editorial board of ANGORA, which I have been reading for many years. Greetings. WACŁAW GRZELAK, retired
They don't know where to look.
Without being a supporter of any party, I read attentively, watch on tv and watch presidential candidates in our upcoming May elections. Most of them have either not read the constitution, or have mediocre advisors, as this clearly states what the president can do if he wishes to abide by it. Only one, R. Trzaskowski, at rallies and electoral meetings sometimes says: If the government is assertive, I will make a legislative initiative myself.
Candidates sometimes besides talk – but only erstwhile asked – about the support polls concerning them and competitors. Journalists in tv studios ask sociologists, political scientists and organization representatives who present their candidates, for example: What are you going to do to get Mrs. Biejat to improve her ratings? I will not quote the answer, due to the fact that it is not worth it, the banner, but I will give a hint to the Left where she should look for her constituents for the future.
Interestingly, the PO candidate helped this organization by announcing that: The right to supply household 800+ is limited only to those Ukrainian refugees who work and pay taxes in Poland. The net immediately became crowded and crowded with entries about Ukrainians on our pot, with their authors forgetting that their spending is in the order of PLN 3.5 billion, while the lowest estimates say 15 billion taxation revenues and contributions to NFZ and ZUS only from them. Today, 292,000 of the about 400 1000 eligible Ukrainian children attending school receive benefits. What about $110,000? I don't know.
The fact that the anti-immigrant attack on Ukrainians has been going on for respective years is not a secret. Ukrainians here, so far, have small influence on our public affairs, due to the fact that fewer have Polish citizenship. For 12 years, our citizenship was given to up to 2,000 Ukrainians per year, and they were holders of the Polish Charter. Only after the outbreak of the war with Russia did this figure increase to 5,000 people per year. And this means that in a fewer years' time, there may already be tens of thousands of Ukrainian immigrants in Poland and they may be a crucial electorate. It will be the largest group of foreigners entitled to vote. Why am I writing about this? Not due to the fact that Grandma was Ukrainian and Grandpa was Polish, but due to the fact that observing our policy, I announcement that the Left was the only organization that did not take part in the anti-immigrant run of fresh years. He has a chance to think well about erstwhile voting in the Sejm and legislature over their laws, Ukrainians, straight or indirectly concerning.
Until recently, Ukrainians were cheering for Trzaskowski. Now they're looking at Biejat or they're not going to vote. Although there may be fewer of them yet, but in presidential elections that do not require any conversions, all vote matters. And if Mrs. Biejat thanks them for the votes, it's her decision, even if she loses. WNUK veneer from behind Bug
Cat has 7 lives
...and the driver of 7 driving bans! As you can see, our (non)state has taken seriously for those who are banned from driving. There will be a change, and now it will be impossible to drive a vehicle with a periodic ban due to the fact that it will be issued for life. So, as you should understand, drivers will just drive with multiple life bans. And what does that change? There's not a word about what's going to happen erstwhile you catch a driver with a life ban. In average countries, specified a individual goes consecutive out of his way to prison, it's simple. But not a word about it with us, for who will emergence against specified a many electorate as notorious drunkards? Of course, it would be better for you if specified persons were given a word of imprisonment at home or in an open prison, due to the fact that where would respective tens of thousands of people be accommodated? And so many would be very fast.
And 1 more thing. After a pursuit involving respective police cars and respective officers, and even harm to police vehicles, the caught delegate receives, for example, a mandate of 500 PLN and any ban on driving for respective months. What about the cost of the chase? Who's paying for this? We, of course, we! It's time to halt leniency. And finally. If individual truly wants to end telephone calls while driving and, of course, another violations of the rules, the rule must be mandatory that the individual breaking the road rules receives a driving ban calculated in proportion to the number of punishment points received. For nothing works like specified a ban. Especially for mothers who gotta make a telephone call in the morning to see if the kid is in the locker area without Google’s help. Greetings. Tomash
Borders of Poland
We know that the borders of Poland are: Baltic, Tatras, Bug and Odra with Nysa. As Nysa is, not all Pole can say. any have even heard that Prussia was divided by Stalin into the northern part, which the Russians took as a war spoil, and the confederate part, awarded to Poland. This boundary was set precisely as Comrade Stalin pointed out on the map. In the area of Brzeźnica he made a tiny breakdown to keep the full town on the Russian side. The English, as early as 1919, invented that the east border of Poland was Curzon's line, based on Bug. This was due to the fact that the Poles were the cultural majority west of Bug. erstwhile it came to signing the established border, the Polish side was represented by Prime Minister Osóbka-Morawski.
The papers were prepared by the English at Churchill's individual command. There was an exchange of papers for the 1 that Stalin signed. People-Morawski was prepared a map, on which all towns west of Bug, namely Lviv, Mościska and Jagielloński, were within the borders of Poland. The Russians were prepared with another map. In the second version, the border north of Lviv turned west, leaving Lviv and another cities on the Russian side. Seeing what Stalin signed, the Polish Prime Minister spewed that this was a mistake. "You be Osibka" (a Russian error) replied Stalin, making fun of the name of the Polish Prime Minister. Thus the English stole Poland's Lviv and the surrounding area. The confederate border is Bieszczady, Tatras and Sudeta. Initially, the brave Czechs entered the Kłodzka Basin with tanks. On Stalin's orders, they retreated. There's the Western border, the 1 with the Germans. Again, our “friends from England” have decided abroad on Oder and Nysa... Kłodzka. Stalin summoned Generals I and II of the Polish Army and asked them what they thought.
One courageous general replied: “Salin’s companion, Germany, will sooner or later fight the Slavs again. The border on Oder and Nysa Kłodzka would be 798 kilometres. If the border were on Oder and Nysa Lusatia, it would have only 529 kilometres and would have been easier to defend.” This argument spoke to Stalin and to the gathering with Churchill and Truman, for no reason, demanded a border proposed by Poles. Green Mountain, Żagań, Legnica, Wałbrzych and many another cities were awarded to Poland. Truman did not want to be worse and (remembering the pending elections) did not want the rivers to divide Szczecin as the cities of Zgorzelec and Gorlitz or Frankfurt and Słubice. He approached the map and from the village of Gartz waved a line north to the Baltic, leaving ALL Szczecin, Police, Nowe Warpno and Świnoujście on the Polish side of the border. The full island of Wolin and part of the island of Uznam were awarded to Poland, which was not liked by the Prime Minister of large Britain, who did not want to have a strong Poland, due to the fact that this, traditionally, was pro-French, although it was not always good for Napoleon.
Few people know that Cromwell gave the Swedes the money to attack Poland, which ended in the Swedish flood, and more modern English prevented the signing of the unification treaty of Czechoslovakia and Poland in 1926, paying Joseph Piłsudski 2 million 600 1000 to prevent it. The train with the Czechoslovak delegation was not allowed in Poland. After the May bombing, many experienced commanders were dismissed, replacing them with those whose only advantage was that they were in the Legions. For Witos and another “incorrigibles”, a camp was established in Bereza Kartuska. There was even a leader of Silesian insurgents – (...). Piłsudski, before leaving the villa in Magdeburg prison, gave an officer's word of honor that he would not want to recover a square mile from the erstwhile Prussian occupation.
The Germans and the future self-appointed marshal agreed that Klaipeda should be a Polish port on the Baltic Sea, in exchange for approval to scope Odessa on the Black Sea. The treaty was guarded by the “Red Count” Kessler. Initially as an intermediary between the government in Berlin and a prisoner in Magdeburg, later as a German proxy in Warsaw. Germans dropped Lenin, Poles – Piłsudski. Of course, what I wrote will not be taught in schools. surely not during the ministry of education by Mrs Nowacka, who spoke on the air about the construction of concentration camps by Polish Nazis. Mr. Donald Tusk went to aid her, saying he would not have any consequences, due to the fact that it was just a slip of the tongue. If it were up to me, I wouldn't even hire her at school to be a cleaning lady. Ba! I'd ban her from going close schools within 100 meters.
And by the way, this full modern science, it's a common rapping, sitting on the net for hours, not reading newspapers and books, leading to "one out of ten" shows winning people in their 50s, and students and various types of "menageries" fall out first. I admire Mr Tadeusz Sznuk for his reactions to stupid answers. Here's an example. Question: "What was the name of the matrimony from Night and Days?" Answer: “Jan and Bogumil”! Mr Tadeusz's comment: "And that would be a very modern marriage"! We've come to live in a time where kids brag about their graduation, although they haven't read any reading due to the fact that they're adequate to survey online. My colleague wanted to give me Sienkiewicz's “Trilogia”, but he could not find it. It turned out that his son-in-law burned books in the central heating oven, due to the fact that “it is all online!”. The father-in-law did not kill him, but reminded him that the specialists in the burning of books were Gestapo and Red Army. I, on the another hand, don't know anyone who read “Crossers” online. MARIAN PEKA, Austria
