Letters to the editorial board of Angola (22.03.2026)

“Ave Cesar, ave Trump”

The show must go on!

I never liked America for almost everything – for the massacre of Indians, for slavery, for the savagery of explorers, for the savagery of the West, for the universal access to weapons from which children shoot at children – and yet America was always the object of sighing, especially erstwhile we were patting poverty. Like Grandma Helenka in my letter “Ave Cesar, ave Trump” (ANGORA No. 7) I never shared this charm and sheepish momentum. Years have passed, a lot has changed, but inactive our main concern was our parties, our elections, our pits and our woes.

Today we are worried about Europe and even the full world. Trump's second word fell into a media trance and in the light of the cameras reveals what utilized to be a secret of the cabinets, and only then it was made public. He made it out of his presidency. reality show, Because he likes it the most, but showing people's hunting, killing them in broad daylight, and arresting them with the previously unknown premeditation and brutality has made America's spell go down yet like a bubble of soap.

While maintaining all the proportions and geopolitical conditions, what is the difference between Trump's autocracy and Ayatollah's theocracy? In fact, only by scale and by methods, due to the fact that goals are similar, and the purpose, as we know, justifies means. In both cases, it is about dominance, the government of souls and not recognizing another reasons beyond their own. The pretext to attack can be everything and nothing, and the fact is so hidden that it is hard to have an nonsubjective assessment, although the pronunciation of facts seems obvious. We see all this present in the mediate East, but it has nothing to do with what is happening in the US.

Trump wants not so much to make America large again, due to the fact that its size and meaning no 1 reasonable questions, but again the white invaders have dreamed of since they set ft there. possibly they could have done it if they hadn't invented slavery and forced blacks to work hard on cotton plantations for a bowl of beans in the sun of the American South. They were beaten, humiliated and killed for money. Unaware of their fate, emigrants from all corners of the world, all races and colors of skin, all religions, churches and religions, besides decided to effort this honey and arrived there, which in turn made America never was and will not be white. No Trump and no MEGA can undo the ellipse of history.

Professor Kolodko in the same issue of ANGORA in an interview entitled "Run Forward Before Trump 2.0" advises you to wait out this hard time, but does not hide that the consequences will be severe and perennial. Trump's impeachment doesn't believe, so it all indicates that Epstein's friend will proceed to do his occupation due to the fact that show must go on. So far everything's going on far distant from us, but he's not sleeping due to the fact that we have another war close and we gotta worry about each other. Perspectives are poor, due to the fact that more than 60 percent. The Russians inactive support their showman Putin, and Poland places its enemies in the top five. The planet became a hostage to 2 unpredictable presidents with an atomic suitcase. Fortunately, prof. Kolodko believes that the 3rd planet war will not be – and he better be right... L.C.

SAFE for idiots?

It never occurred to me that I would comment on something as idiotic as “Polish SAFE 0 percent”. On the another hand, I besides know that any of those to which this political play is directed will not read or accept any rational arguments. But someway you gotta get it out of your system. possibly it will be easier to feel a work towards the community – burdened to the limits of resilience.

The proposal of “Polish SAFE 0 percent” is an example of political illusion sold as feeling liable for security. It sounds catchy, but it is in fact an effort to circumvent the foundations of the constitutional order of public finances. It is adequate to look into the Constitution of the Republic of Poland to remember that the financing of the deficit by the central bank is explicitly prohibited in Poland. This is the fuse that protects the state from the temptation of politicians to print banknotes to solve problems. Many countries face the deficit problem, but fewer – outside the US, whose dollar is inactive the world's reserve currency No. 1 – scope for this way of tying the end to ends, that is, large spending and little revenue.

The National Bank of Poland is not and cannot become a origin of financing of current government spending. Its primary task is to guarantee the stableness of money. If we start treating him like an ATM to implement ambitious weapons plans, the consequence is obvious: inflationary pressure. And inflation is simply a taxation imposed quietly, but most annoying to average citizens and businesses. Does anyone truly think you can pump billions into the strategy without raising prices? The economical past is full of examples, which ends with "creative" financing of public spending. We gotta arm ourselves. This is not disputed present by anyone another than the “Russian onus”, but there are some. But a serious state finances safety in a unchangeable and transparent way: from the budget, from marketplace debt, from real income.

If something is specified a superb solution, a product of Glapinski and Nawrocki genius, why not become a standard in another countries? Why do states with developed economies and strong armies not fund arms straight through central banks? The answer is simple: they know that this is simply a shortcut to destabilizing currency and losing credibility. Moreover, all financial structures are by definition subject to legal and treaty restrictions. Military purchases are subject to global agreements, alliance obligations, tendering procedures.

This isn't a want concert. As a result, it is easy to imagine a situation where central bank money would drive imports alternatively than home production. So we would have inflation in the country and profit abroad. large business – only not for Poland. The worst part is that national safety is trying to play like a marketing slogan. "zero percent" sounds good in the slogan, but does not be in the economy. Each state expenditure has a cost – either in taxes, either in debt or in inflation. Pretending to be able to conjure up measures without consequences is an insult to simple logic and to citizens who have the right to a fair debate.

Constitutional fuses are not to be celebrated erstwhile they are uncomfortable. Playing with the stableness of money under the slogan "security" is shortsightedness, which can cost us dearly – and sooner than many enthusiasts of this concept seem. Unless it's Nobel in Economics for Nawrock. This would indeed be an enviable sight if the winners of the Nobel Prize stood in 1 row Trump for peace and Nawrock for economics. I'm sorry, I know it's impossible, and no 1 can fall for it due to the fact that these 2 awards are not presented in the same place. A.Z. from the territory of the United States

And after the games...

In the eyes of the Minister of Sport, 4 medals for Poland in Milan and Cortina were a large success. A skeptical reporter reminded us that Australia overtook us, and that's where they have the winter in July. The minister promised to build a sledge track in Karpacz, where to this day the ruined track, which acted as “communies”. In these games, by any miracle, the Polish won sixth place, driving on nine-year-old sleds! present (February 25) I saw our talented youth practicing on TV... riding on the level of a gym or on asphalt bike paths. This makeshift sled track will be built next year.

Let me remind you: Germany out of their 26 medals until nineteen won in the ice gutter (bobs, sleds, skeleton). Is it worth having 1 track in the twentieth economy of the world? Worth it! Although not all gold shines well. Laura Nolte, the winner of the gold medal in the 2 bobsled and silver in the one, received 30 1000 euros for her gold medal, but for her mechanics, transport from competitions to competitions, paying for hotels, buying fresh beds, etc., must spend about 50 1000 euros annually – for 4 years, until the next games. Bobsled sports is neglected by tv and the ministry of sport. Only thanks to individual sponsors is it possible to cultivate it by lovers of this athletics idealists.

The contestant has announced her cry for aid for this sport, which has always brought the most medals to Germany at the games, but those practicing this athletics are not sufficiently assisted by state institutions. It's beautiful crazy among the Norwegians. They won 41 medals, including 18 gold, but no athlete will get a cent prize for the won medal. In return, they don't gotta worry about any financial matters during sports... There is 1 more aspect of sports. Consider, for example, 2 neighbouring states: Holland and Belgium. Both countries are almost the same size. Both have over 11 million citizens. In the medal classification the Dutch took 3rd place, winning 20 medals, including 10 zlotys. Belgium scored 1 (one) brown... It's a good subject for a PhD in sports psychology. After the construction of respective ski jumpers in Poland, we saw the successors of Wojciech Fortuna: Małysz, Stoch, Kubacki, Żyły and now Tomasiak with Nąski... After the ice track was built, we had the successors of Mrs Ryś-Ferenc, winning medals at the European Championships, to which the Dutch did not arrive – preparing the top form for the Olympic Games.

We built 2,600 Orlics, but in football in predictable time, Poles will not win the planet championship. Even if there were 26,000 of these unused Eagles. Medal-efficient disciplines are not only bobsled, but besides swimming. By building more pools we won't catch up with the Australians, but the Hungarians are already within our reach. If you do not stand for the 20th economy of the planet (for Gierka we were reportedly in the top ten), then let us buy out an inactive hotel in Vill (then specified a territory of Innsbruck) and replace it with a Polish sports station for bobsleigh trainers, sledgesticks and skeleton. The Igls Ice Track is simply a mile away. In return, let us make available to the Austrians any of our Cetniewa or hotel in the seaside Jastrzeże Góra (this is no lobbying, this is an thought that I make available for free!). In the future, let's halt limiting which of our mountaineers, apart from Martyna Goose-Daniel, can go to the Olympics! They didn't train 4 years to find out a fewer days before the competition they wouldn't go. Did the old slogan “Balcerowicz must go!” should be replaced present with “Pisiewicz must go!”? MARIAN PEKA

position of the nearest individual

Once again, the discussion about the position of the nearest individual has spread. As I hear the opinions of any people (the PiS members lead in this), quoting the classic, “the knife opens itself in my pocket.” Personally, I'm against legalizing gay marriage. I associate matrimony – and I say that the vast majority of Poles – with the relation between a female and a man. That is our constitution and our tradition. However, I am in favour of legally sanctioning partnerships. According to statistics, more and more young Poles and Poles stay in informal relationships – I am talking about relationships between women and men. Each of us in our immediate surroundings (family, friends, coworkers) knows many specified couples. They live together, they live together, they run common households, they manage the home budget together. And it's good as long as it's good, but erstwhile tragedy happens (financial difficulties, property matters, illness or death), they collide with cruel reality. Unfortunately, in the face of the law, they are strangers to each other.

This legal position besides applies to homosexual couples. I am against adopting children by specified couples, but I am besides in favour of legally sanctioning their relationships. Turning to the discussion of the draft Act on the position of the closest person, I watched politicians from the right side of the political scene say in respective tv stations, and I thought it was a pity that I did not participate in them. due to the fact that in consequence to their arguments, I would say: “What would you say, you idiot, if a loved 1 (your beloved son, daughter, grandson, granddaughter) came to you and said that she is happy in her life, that she wants to live with individual she loves very much, that she wants to go through life for good and bad? If she told you that she didn't want to have a formal matrimony or that she was chosen by the same sex? What would you say to her, you idiot? He threw it out of the house, threw it out of his heart, erased it from his memory? Would you tell her she's not human to you anymore, she's an ideology? Or would you talk, hug, want her well, and enjoy her happiness? How would you react? Would love for this individual prevail, or would your party's ideology and fear of how her leader will justice you? The choice is yours.”

Incidentally, many staunch opponents of this bill are after divorces, any after Catholic annulments of marriage. They erstwhile swore something to someone. Many live or live in informal relationships. Many of these considerations do not concern me due to the fact that (at least formally) they have no children, no grandchildren. But each of us has the most loved, the dearest. Unless I'm incorrect and they're not. PIOTR

I don't feel weird.

I have 1 problem with the LGBT community. They usage the word “queer” which in English means “wrong”. It's like people who usage that phrase are just saying that they are "strange" and they don't want to be perceived as such? I wanted to leave it to all LGBT activists to ponder that speaking about oneself virtually as “strange” is simply a sign of self-stigmatisation. I myself am a LGBT individual and I do not like the phrase “queer”. I'm just curious, why in the LGBT environment, for which I personally do not identify myself for many reasons – specified a love for this word, which necessarily puts them in a negative light? TOMASHUA

Ring free...

I've never liked a violent athletics like boxing and its derivatives, which, in their particulars, drop attempted murder, like kick boxing. The desire to bring the enemy's consciousness to the brink of losing it, in my opinion, shows a deficiency of humanity, and surely a deficiency of part of human behavior. In the context of boxing, the discipline associated with Mr Karol Nawrocki (PKN), I would like to present, seen from my perspective, his function as president of the country. Contracted on 6 August 2025 for 12 rounds, the fight against Coalition on 15 October began with a classical "face-off", that is, a look into the eyes of the opponent before the audience and the media (after weighing). In boxing, it is an chance to show your emotions, provoke with gestures, names, frequently with hands. In the real world, the day before the message, PKN called Mr Donald Tusk (PDT) the worst Polish Prime Minister after 1989. During the message, the recently elected president entered government shoes, dreaming of the underdeveloped dreams of changing the political strategy in Poland to the presidential one.

Back to the fight. In the corner of the PKN ring, I see a landing of politicians and supporters of the Law and Justice, whose speech of the body shows that they caught God by the legs. In their DNA, the organization implanted the gene of defeating the Civic Coalition (KO) before the time – by KO – knockout (KnockOut) – vetoing vital laws, overthrowing the government and thus bringing about earlier elections. The seconds in the ringing corner of PKN no 1 prevails, trusting in their coaching preparation at the group in Nowogrodzka. During the “fight” circular of “The Cabinet Council” we saw PKN bring consecutive punches in the form of government instructions. These blows met with the repost of Mr. Donald Tusk, who had his defender veiled with words: "...The council is not a substitute for government or parliament, and it is surely not a debate club."

On the another hand, in the circular of the “National safety Council”, Mr. Karol Nawrocki, with the tirade of the monologue, struck unclean blows at the PDT, standing with unprepared to defend with his hands, not giving him a voice in the open part of the meeting. In this round, PKN committed a second foul – by hitting below the belt (the subject of the pre-school rank), grilling the talker of the Sejm with social and business contacts, thereby trying to rip respective bricks from the wall of the government coalition. Already at the beginning of this round, he presented himself with a certificate reducing the boxer's class, with an abruptly disqualifying kick saying that he did not enjoy sitting at the table with his guest, Marshal Włodzimierz Czarzasty. I will sign the circular with a quote from associate Ryszard Terlecki from another “fight”: “stupidness”. In the Polish political boxing there are no interruptions on the board with the number of the next round, it is an uninterrupted string of fighting against the government in the circular entitled "vetting the bill". To the bare eye, 1 can see, that this is the consequence, among others, of the failure by PDT of the PKN whim, i.e. not sending to the palace a herrold with authoritative information about draft laws to agree.

Does taking many blows to the head in training and competitions, or possibly even a collision with a blunt object on a forest stand, stay unaffected by the fighter's state of mind? I don't think so. Listening to the justification of the PKN to the vetoed Act on the National Judicial Council, I was certain that it was a comment on a akin Law of the Law of the Law of 20 December 2017 with a laity about: "...action incompatible with the constitutional model of the KRS, which is intended to guarantee a balance between authorities; about the casting of the body of people associated with 1 organization to a political/judicial dispute". And this was only a strengthening of the earlier words of Mr.Andrew Duda (PAD-a), or "souls from the depth of a clay pitcher." And he went on to fight the PKN again, strengthening the boxing fist with a fresh weapon – his counter-proposation of the Law on Judiciary and waving the punishments of long-term imprisonment for questioning neo structures in the judiciary, stood in a series of authoritarian "wary people" with the manager of the sowchoz – Alexander Lukashenko at the head (...). JOHN