Let us celebrate in February
The old adage says, "It's coming in February. I know at least 2 interpretations of that phrase. any say these shoes are to be sewn up on the slides that are waiting for frost. Others say that shoes are to be handcuffed to dance due to the fact that February is the period of carnival.
February as a month, not only that short, it besides has no state holidays (it was clearly besides cold to host uprisings), so no occasion for a long weekend. That doesn't mean you can't celebrate different holidays this month. And there's a choice. The beginning of the period could be champagne. And this virtually – 6 February is the global Barman Day. Like many well-connected holidays, it besides has a saint patron, Saint Amanda, who is the guardian of winemakers, brewers, innkeepers, bartenders and grape and wine producers.
I don't think there's a profession (except possibly the oldest one) that has so many stories about another people's lives heard. During their stay in the bar – combined with tasting – customers are prepared to be more open than in the confessional. possibly due to the fact that the narrator's not moving out of time. I like 1 thing most about the jokes: The bartender asks a sad client who has already made a fewer glasses without reasoning about what he's enjoying. The 1 with the hold admits that the reason is the mother-in-law. The bartender, trying to comfort a man, says that she's not the first 1 the client had a broken voice to, after drinking another glass, she says that she was pregnant with him. The bartender had nothing more to do in this situation than drink with a client. In order to hear specified or akin stories, it is worth visiting a bar and celebrating.
Immediately after Valentine's Day, which is February 15, any – mostly by necessity – can celebrate Singla Day. As a substance of fact, this vacation is reportedly the most celebrated in bars. However, I do not urge – even singles – staying close the bar from 6 February until 15. There are inactive a fewer days to celebrate in February. The first proposal, namely the Day without a bribe, can be understood in 2 ways. For those who don't give bribes, it's truly a holiday, due to the fact that they'll save a fewer bucks. Worse with those who take. It'll be a traumatic experience for them. 1 should want for the occasion of that day that the substance should be resolved in specified a way. But everyone can have real fun at the end of the month. This is February 24, and it will be Monday this year, the Day of the Unexpected Kiss. It's kind of like these bribes: you don't know – to kiss yourself or wait for someone's initiative? But let us remember – if we truly want to celebrate – this is expected to be an unexpected kiss.
Not like a husband says good-bye to his wife, going to work, or as friends greet after a fewer hours of invisibility. It's expected to be a surprise kiss. We gotta take our chances. After all, what's incorrect with us? erstwhile upon a time, 1 of my colleagues – as I think all married man truly knows about male-dames relations I draw from the stories of my colleagues – expressed the rule that kissing a girl unexpectedly, you can get in the face, but sometimes you can get something much more from her, and for this “more” it is worth risking. So let's take our chances, ladies and gentlemen. due to the fact that when, if not on the day of this wonderful holiday. This chance may not happen soon. possibly it's never gonna happen. ANDRZEJ WELCOME
Reflections by a feminist
The inspiration for writing this letter was the message by Mr.K. Gruszewski in his letter entitled “Abortion” (ANGORA nr 49). Problem as old as the world, but the thing is, for 2,000 years, it's inactive unsolved. Why is that? due to the fact that it happened that it was men with physical force who forced women to submit and stick to it, announcing various theories about inferiority of the sex, which finds no substantive justification. It's just my ego... As a rule, they have mastered all the key positions and they besides decide for women as if they were incapacitated. investigation by genetic scientists (America) has shown that women have the stronger genetic material, 2 chromosomes XX, XY men – this is mainly about gender-decision. Which does not translate into reality, for it is men who blame a female if they do not give birth to a male offspring as they wish.
Not knowing, but just being false and hypocritical. The same applies to abortion rights. According to parliamentarians, it is as if women themselves have done to themselves these unwanted and deformed fetuses, so they charge them with sole guilt and propose to put them in prison for the removal of the fetus. 1 would think that abortion surgery is like cosmetic for a woman, not physical and intellectual suffering. Where are these men? – Danuta Rinn sang. At home they grow fond of caring mothers, and at the age of maturity they act against women. These women are frequently their wives, their fiancées, their sisters, their friends. Here's the question: where are these men fighting in the name of an uninitiated life, and erstwhile specified a fetus is born, they usually vanish in a blue female because... they can't. But a female has to rise specified a disabled kid 24 hours a day alone! Why don't these parliamentarians at least bring about effective recovery of legal alimony? There's a field to show! The problem of abortion, unfortunately, always returns as a substitute theme, in order to distract the public from another problems. I besides have this question:
And what about killing young people, women, children – in connection with wars that, unfortunately, origin men? Here too, women bear the consequences. Is this killing allowed? Believers comment on abortion that it is simply a sin. And killing people is glory? So, killing the life of the uninitiated is simply a sin, and already conceived is not? I think more people have specified dilemmas. Thousands of people are murdered all day in the name of religion and God. Is abortion a counterweight for killing? Thank you to Mr K. Gruszewski, the Man, that although he was 1 in his letter to ANGORY, he stood on the right side of the barricade, that is, in the defence of women.
I congratulate him on his nonsubjective judgement of the current problem. Men with snacks talk about women fighting: feminists – and this name in Latin means female and there is no confusion about her. I wrote those bitter words of fact in defence of young women, and that doesn't apply to me anymore. But I see the importance of the problem, which is constantly being pushed aside despite pre-election promises. Members of Parliament! You were elected to represent the will of the voters (woman too), not to obscure your conscience. If this conscience is so hard on you, I propose you change your profession to 1 where there will be no specified dilemmas. CRISTINAL ALICIA RESIAK
Sovereign
Quite often, politicians, journalists, and even those writing to the weekly magazine, speaking and writing about the electorate of PiS supporters, usage the word "syneren". Especially before and after the election. And since we have any choices and the longest time between them is 2 – 2.5 years, then the concept, the name "syderene" has been as if everyday. Is that right? hard to say. The Polish language dictionary reads: "Suveren (fr. souverain, supreme) – in the mediate Ages: an independent ruler without any authority: sometimes present besides about an independent ruler, e.g. king and household in England". And now a horse with a row to answer the question.
Who, erstwhile and why first utilized that word in public debate? I, a humble reader of the weekly magazine with the remainder of grey hair on my head, bet on Jarosław Kaczyński. And not due to his intellectual insight into the reading of social sentiments, but the thoughts of creating a separate group of people, easy controlled by him, according to his and only his will, utilizing the cooperative structures of the state created by the Law and Justice. And that in the mediate Ages apart from kings ‘rulers without any authority’ were bishops (not always priests), with their head pope at the Vatican, it was present that the editor in Toruń joined with his sheep of various ages and genders to a nearly 10 million sovereigns. In a situation unenviable are those (including me in the countryside) who want, or at least try, to scope these people just to make any contact in verbal discussion on arguments. In the country, it is simply a ‘brez half a liter does not take up’.
This is seen almost all day on TV, radio on the net erstwhile an invited author or Confederate presents his views. Although he ‘presents’ is simply a mild euphemism, as he mostly yells and insults the inexcusable invectors of another adversaries. I would divide this community, called sovereign, into 3 groups, from their names from the press and the net. The first is “aparatists”. For me, it's unattainable, and even if it was, after talking to Błaszczak, my head would hurt, I would have had any brain fog, and without a two-week treatment with any detox, I wouldn't have survived. The second is ‘educated chames’, besides unattainable. And again, if she was, I would have a problem with who to choose to discuss. Whether prof. “wilders know it” Czarnek, or “these plecki” Terletski, or simply Dominika Tarczyński. And the third, most numerous, to me already available, is simply a alleged dark people. And among them, those who walk and neglect the election.
True, in utmost cases it may end in spitting or chasing forks from the yard, but it is worth trying. 2 in my village managed to convince me not to vote for (names will not be given) due to the fact that – and here give its activity in sessions of village councils, communes or territory in NAS matters, not what the tv Republic says. The heat poured on Jurk Owsiak for many years has late brought the other effect to the intended one. As shortly as the old man was captured (as he himself said) by tv Republika, threatening to kill Oatsiak, I found this entry online: "For the 33rd WOŚP final, I was expected to put 33 PLN in a can. Now k...and I will transfer PLN 3333".
We have quite a few time. It is worth trying to convince even 1 (one) not to cast the vote as the candidate president of all presidents. And yet – so that there is no uncertainty – I am not a sovereign. MICHAEL:
He studied, but he didn't study.
The title statement, which is simply a travesty of Bill Clinton, who "burned grass but did not enlist," and who someway had so small commitment to have sex with an assistant, can be referred to many prominent Collegium Humanum students. Now these diplomas, unique for any time, the universities verify the CBA, employers employing its graduates, decision makers in matters of supervisory boards. And that's what's desirable. However, I am referring to a peculiar student who not only does not admit to his diploma, but even studies. The narration of this student looks something like this: Here 1 day his closest associate passed by the Collegium Humanum building, decided to enter there to study to survey himself and his principal. Everything is completely unknowing.
Without consulting the chief, he chose this college just due to the fact that he was passing by. I know that I utilized the subject here from "Misia", but I did it consciously due to the fact that the translation is more or little curious in this way. Why did you choose this college? It's simple: due to the fact that that's where 1 of them went. It has happened to you before that you have passed past the University of Warsaw, the School of Social Psychology, the Warsaw University of Technology and another universities, but it has dawned on him that you can both catch up on your deficiency of education, just as you decision around Collegium Humanum. But erstwhile their unpleasant odor spread around the school, they decided to pretend that nothing happened, that it was completely accidental, you could say under the influence of a temporary stimulus, choosing the university.
They may believe it themselves, but nobody seems to accept specified a communicative but the faithful praetorians of their party. There was news that there was a university where you can postgraduate in different directions, and the diploma of this school is highly valued in the decision-making circles of the erstwhile power. If these failed students immediately at the beginning erstwhile the doubts arose, explained the substance clearly and transparently, there would have been no full confusion, although no 1 would have believed that they chose the school due to its high-level placement in the planet ranking of universities. In 1 of the newspapers, I came across a text in which 1 considers – with a question mark – whether Szymon Hołownia had taken up his studies. Specialists speak, including the “professor” with the function of the Rector of 1 of Warsaw's private universities.
It would not be amazing if it were not for the fact that this expert has been tried for respective years in criminal proceedings for crimes committed to the detriment of individuals: academic teachers, companies and institutions. The university he previously directed did not pay teachers' salaries, did not pay social safety contributions, did not regulate rents, and did another scams to conceal the assets and not be able to enforce the university's liabilities. This individual has been avoiding justice for years, so, as in our custom, he drags an extraordinary trial, most likely so that everything ends with a statute of limitations. And this is expected to be an expert who has the right to talk about trials taking place in higher education? possibly he besides finished Collegium Humanum, though nothing, especially decency, learned. WASZKIWICZ NARCIZ
Political rodeo
Until recently, I could not imagine that the president of the country, in which the world's first free constitution was adopted, would join Russia's world-shaking dictator. 4 years ago, erstwhile Joe Biden began his presidency in the United States, I associated with the launch of the flagship of American democracy. Today, the ship wrapped up in port, and the sails make corsarian and pirate ships.
Political unrest is expanding from the unexpected. It seems to me an adequate association with the chaotic West, but it was already at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries erstwhile the American administration faced difficulties in bringing the regulation of law to the west of the continent due to the fact that it was wild. Wildness is beginning to glare from the continent present too, but the American “presence of the regulation of law” seems to be becoming a democratic world.
The rush to implement the extremist ideas of the U.S. president from the time of the first presidency caused their eruption even before swearing in on 20 January this year to the 47th U.S. President. The calibre of president Elect's wishes, future demands and even threats to countries and territories, gives emergence to a sense of taste, surprise and horror. After all, the principles of global law, recognised as mandatory standards even for those countries that have not given their consent, are an component of any abroad policy.
Are those Donald Trump's excesses to be taken seriously by the citizens affected? What about the safety of countries for which circumstantial territorial claims are made? Should the Canadian authorities prepare to execute state duties as part of the US? Is it a dilemma to laughter or cry to president D. Trump to change U.S. position to the state of Canada? The planet is not a supermarket, you can not take Greenland to your basket, pay (under threat of military use) and enjoy fresh ice all year round. Just as president D. Trump may request Panama to hand over the canal, breaking the treaty signed by president Jimmy Carter, so it seems that Native American people can negate the Indian Removal Act and request that the lands that are inactive ruled by Wakan Tank, Tirawa and the large Manitu be surrendered.
International law should be respected by all president regardless of dreams of the power or military strength of his country. president D. Trump's environment buffonade festival, smitten by the imagination of power coming before their boss takes office, embarrasses the heads of state and embarrasses the addressees of the unsavory attractions, offensive nicknames and attempts to influence government change or elections in the European country. Over-standard wealth does not authorize this kind of behavior, but it can be seen that it excludes cognition of savoir-vivre principles. Complementing this cognition is like solving an equation with 1 unknown X (formerly Twitter). There is besides a phrase in English utilized in the absence of human comfort and bad manners: “Behave as small as you can, but behave.” Poland besides had its jest – Stańczyk, but ours was nicely dressed and at least known for its courageous political jokes, but for its – principles (kings) and their surroundings. JOHN
A Real Man Without cognition
President Kaczyński, indated by the "Hitler media", who thinks that MP Mezza's immunity was lifted (the 1 from prying bullshit to terminally sick patients), stated, as usual in specified a case, that there is no cognition of this issue. The same was actual for questions about visa scandal, Pegasus or Richard C. President, just, there's no knowledge. It's kind of shocking, considering he was in charge. de facto Poland for 8 years without any cognition of matters that are now coming to light. On the another hand, without holding any state posts (except for a short period of time as Deputy Prime Minister for Security), he may sleep peacefully that he will not be caught by the “tucks”.
With no cognition of the functioning of the state that he created, he cannot be punished. How can you punish individual who has no knowledge? president Kaczyński resembles a bit of a mad scientist Frankenstein who created a monster, having no full cognition of who he truly brought to life. However, there is simply a certain thing about which our hero has full knowledge. This is simply a imagination of a country that will make erstwhile it returns to power. He wrote this clearly in an interview given to his favourite Karnowski brothers in their “Networks”.
The Constitution will should be changed and respond to the burning needs of the Law and Justice Party. If there is no majority to change it, then it will. adoption of temporary acts which will form the basis for democratic and non-subsidiary power. In another words, You will request to make a strategy that will not be so easy to challenge. I believe that in this substance president Kaczyński will have the easy task, due to the fact that specified systems, even impossible to challenge, have created statesmen specified as Putin, Lukashenko, Kim Ir Sen and Ayatollah in Iran. I, on the another hand, have received from a man without any cognition of the full cognition of the PiS state after winning the election, so I already know how to vote in 3 years. So that those ominous plans of that small man from hell can never be realized. Jacek M.
